Process mining for agile software process assessment and improvement

IF 4.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107680
Katiane Oliveira Alpes da Silva , Ricardo Massa Ferreira Lima , Vanderson Botelho da Silva
{"title":"Process mining for agile software process assessment and improvement","authors":"Katiane Oliveira Alpes da Silva ,&nbsp;Ricardo Massa Ferreira Lima ,&nbsp;Vanderson Botelho da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Agile software processes, designed for flexibility and continuous improvement, pose challenges in extracting actionable insights from event logs due to their inherent unstructured nature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The study evaluates whether existing process mining techniques can effectively uncover reliable and insightful information on software development processes adopting agile methodologies.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>The work uses various algorithms to analyze procedural flows and business rules within an event log containing data from 3,418 agile software development projects at a company with over 1,500 employees. By categorizing processes according to project size, our analysis aimed to determine the kind of insights these algorithms could reveal. We specifically focused on algorithms that produced high-quality insights for a deeper examination of aspects like effort rate, frequency of activities, and relationships between activities. Subsequently, technical and managerial staff reviewed the results to assess the quality and relevance of the insights generated. Validation involved a semi-structured interview with managers and technicians to ensure the relevance and applicability of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The analysis demonstrates the efficacy of declarative business process techniques in extracting actionable insights from agile development teams’ data. Such techniques accurately capture the daily routines and documented processes of the teams. High-performing teams typically followed fewer rules, had less job rotation, involved fewer individuals, and engaged in a more limited range of activities. Domain experts and team managers found these insights to be coherent and potentially valuable for enhancing the performance of software development processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Declarative modeling is particularly adept at revealing the patterns of flexible software development workflows, presenting initial support for teams, managers, and decision-makers through both descriptive and prescriptive analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107680"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

Agile software processes, designed for flexibility and continuous improvement, pose challenges in extracting actionable insights from event logs due to their inherent unstructured nature.

Objective:

The study evaluates whether existing process mining techniques can effectively uncover reliable and insightful information on software development processes adopting agile methodologies.

Method:

The work uses various algorithms to analyze procedural flows and business rules within an event log containing data from 3,418 agile software development projects at a company with over 1,500 employees. By categorizing processes according to project size, our analysis aimed to determine the kind of insights these algorithms could reveal. We specifically focused on algorithms that produced high-quality insights for a deeper examination of aspects like effort rate, frequency of activities, and relationships between activities. Subsequently, technical and managerial staff reviewed the results to assess the quality and relevance of the insights generated. Validation involved a semi-structured interview with managers and technicians to ensure the relevance and applicability of the findings.

Results:

The analysis demonstrates the efficacy of declarative business process techniques in extracting actionable insights from agile development teams’ data. Such techniques accurately capture the daily routines and documented processes of the teams. High-performing teams typically followed fewer rules, had less job rotation, involved fewer individuals, and engaged in a more limited range of activities. Domain experts and team managers found these insights to be coherent and potentially valuable for enhancing the performance of software development processes.

Conclusions:

Declarative modeling is particularly adept at revealing the patterns of flexible software development workflows, presenting initial support for teams, managers, and decision-makers through both descriptive and prescriptive analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于敏捷软件过程评估和改进的过程挖掘
上下文:为灵活性和持续改进而设计的敏捷软件过程,由于其固有的非结构化性质,在从事件日志中提取可操作的见解方面提出了挑战。目的:该研究评估了现有的过程挖掘技术是否能够有效地揭示采用敏捷方法的软件开发过程的可靠和有见地的信息。方法:该工作使用各种算法来分析事件日志中的过程流和业务规则,该日志包含来自一家拥有超过1,500名员工的公司的3,418个敏捷软件开发项目的数据。通过根据项目规模对过程进行分类,我们的分析旨在确定这些算法可以揭示的见解类型。我们特别关注那些产生高质量见解的算法,以便更深入地检查诸如努力率、活动频率和活动之间的关系等方面。随后,技术和管理人员审查了结果,以评估所产生的见解的质量和相关性。验证包括与管理人员和技术人员进行半结构化访谈,以确保调查结果的相关性和适用性。结果:分析证明了声明式业务流程技术在从敏捷开发团队的数据中提取可操作见解方面的有效性。这些技术准确地捕获了团队的日常工作和文档化的过程。高绩效的团队通常遵循较少的规则,较少的工作轮换,较少的个人参与,并且参与的活动范围更有限。领域专家和团队经理发现这些见解是一致的,并且对于增强软件开发过程的性能具有潜在的价值。结论:声明性建模特别擅长揭示灵活的软件开发工作流的模式,通过描述性和规定性分析为团队、管理人员和决策者提供初始支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
Designing with Dev-X: A systematic mapping of Developer Experience interventions and their business impact Domain-aware graph neural networks for source code vulnerability detection A hybrid XGBoost and SHAP framework for prioritization and interaction analysis of factors driving metaverse adoption in an engineering context Robust and efficient log anomaly detection: A hybrid ID-semantic approach for evolving systems Mutation testing based on non-cooperative Stackelberg game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1