Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of water process engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107236
Chiara Sarti , Ayisha Affo Souleymane , Gabriela Dotro , Alessandra Cincinelli , Tao Lyu
{"title":"Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment","authors":"Chiara Sarti ,&nbsp;Ayisha Affo Souleymane ,&nbsp;Gabriela Dotro ,&nbsp;Alessandra Cincinelli ,&nbsp;Tao Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The performance of treatment wetlands (TWs), as a nature-based solution, in mitigating persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their interactions with existing treatment flowsheets remain unclear. This study investigated PFAS removal in two full-scale surface flow TWs treating secondary effluent from different domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The systems demonstrated their capacities to safeguard natural water bodies by achieving discharge levels of the legacy PFOS (4–4.6 ng L<sup>−1</sup>) and PFOA (1.79–3.27 ng L<sup>−1</sup>) with removal efficiencies of 29%–38% and 15%–34%, respectively. Further upstream and downstream water quality monitoring in receiving waters is required to accurately evaluate PFAS contributions from WWTP effluents. Partitioning behaviour analysis revealed that sediment adsorption was the dominant removal pathway, achieving removal rates 16–61 times higher than plant uptake for PFOS and 1.8–6 times higher for PFOA. Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density were positively correlated with PFAS sequestration, highlighting their importance in controlling PFAS mobility. PFOS accumulation in the sediment was greater in the TW for the WWTP dosing with ferric sulphate than the WWTP without chemical dosing (2.80 mg m<sup>−2</sup> y<sup>−1</sup> vs. 1.34 mg m<sup>−2</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). Notably, a conventional mass balance analysis was challenged by the transformation of PFAS precursors into terminal compounds, including PFOS and PFOA, potentially inflating input concentrations and contributing to mass imbalance during treatment. Further research is necessary to address these complexities, but the findings are encouraging for the use of TWs as scalable, eco-friendly solutions for mitigating PFAS pollution and are instructive for optimising wetland design and operation to safeguard aquatic ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 107236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425003083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of treatment wetlands (TWs), as a nature-based solution, in mitigating persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their interactions with existing treatment flowsheets remain unclear. This study investigated PFAS removal in two full-scale surface flow TWs treating secondary effluent from different domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The systems demonstrated their capacities to safeguard natural water bodies by achieving discharge levels of the legacy PFOS (4–4.6 ng L−1) and PFOA (1.79–3.27 ng L−1) with removal efficiencies of 29%–38% and 15%–34%, respectively. Further upstream and downstream water quality monitoring in receiving waters is required to accurately evaluate PFAS contributions from WWTP effluents. Partitioning behaviour analysis revealed that sediment adsorption was the dominant removal pathway, achieving removal rates 16–61 times higher than plant uptake for PFOS and 1.8–6 times higher for PFOA. Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density were positively correlated with PFAS sequestration, highlighting their importance in controlling PFAS mobility. PFOS accumulation in the sediment was greater in the TW for the WWTP dosing with ferric sulphate than the WWTP without chemical dosing (2.80 mg m−2 y−1 vs. 1.34 mg m−2 y−1). Notably, a conventional mass balance analysis was challenged by the transformation of PFAS precursors into terminal compounds, including PFOS and PFOA, potentially inflating input concentrations and contributing to mass imbalance during treatment. Further research is necessary to address these complexities, but the findings are encouraging for the use of TWs as scalable, eco-friendly solutions for mitigating PFAS pollution and are instructive for optimising wetland design and operation to safeguard aquatic ecosystems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同上游废水处理方式的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在全尺寸地表流处理湿地中的分配和去除
作为一种基于自然的解决方案,处理湿地(TWs)在减轻持久性全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)及其与现有处理流程的相互作用方面的性能尚不清楚。本研究考察了两个全尺寸表面流TWs处理不同生活污水处理厂(WWTPs)二级出水的PFAS去除情况。这些系统对自然水体的保护能力得到了验证,其对PFOS (4-4.6 ng L−1)和PFOA (1.79-3.27 ng L−1)的去除率分别为29%-38%和15%-34%。为了准确评估污水处理厂污水对PFAS的贡献,需要对接收水域进行进一步的上下游水质监测。分配行为分析表明,沉积物吸附是主要的去除途径,对PFOS的去除率比植物吸收高16-61倍,对PFOA的去除率高1.8-6倍。沉积物铁含量、深度和容重与PFAS固存呈正相关,表明它们对控制PFAS迁移具有重要意义。在TW中,添加硫酸铁的污水处理厂沉积物中全氟辛烷磺酸的积累量大于未添加化学物质的污水处理厂(2.80 mg m−2 y−1 vs. 1.34 mg m−2 y−1)。值得注意的是,传统的质量平衡分析受到了PFAS前体转化为末端化合物(包括PFOS和PFOA)的挑战,这可能会增加输入浓度并导致处理过程中的质量不平衡。为了解决这些复杂性,需要进一步的研究,但这些发现对于使用TWs作为可扩展的、生态友好的解决方案来减轻PFAS污染是令人鼓舞的,并且对于优化湿地设计和运营以保护水生生态系统具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
期刊最新文献
Green photocatalytic degradation of methylene green dye using oxalic acid and its metal complexes: Mechanistic and predictive insights from ANN, RSM, and DFT studies Granular stability mechanism and microbial shifts of the anammox process operated at 15 °C Turbulent characteristics around sediment reduction facilities imitating dragonfly wings in sewer systems Role of heterogeneity of counter-diffusional biofilm on microaeration-assisted for nitrophenol degradation: Metabolic pathways and microbial mechanisms Carbon-source bio-enhanced activated carbon (CBEAC) for efficient ammonia nitrogen removal in water treatment: Performance improvement and microbial mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1