Comparing the impact of foot and hand reflexology on anxiety and physiological indices in colonoscopy candidates: A randomized clinical trial

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101449
Mohamad Golitaleb , Ali Safdari , Fatemeh Rafiei , Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh , Najmeh Mohamadi , Razieh Mokhtari
{"title":"Comparing the impact of foot and hand reflexology on anxiety and physiological indices in colonoscopy candidates: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Mohamad Golitaleb ,&nbsp;Ali Safdari ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Rafiei ,&nbsp;Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh ,&nbsp;Najmeh Mohamadi ,&nbsp;Razieh Mokhtari","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>Colonoscopy is a standard diagnostic procedure, yet pre-procedural anxiety remains a prevalent concern. While pharmacological interventions are available, non-pharmacological approaches such as reflexology offer a promising alternative. Despite its therapeutic potential, comparative evidence on foot and hand reflexology in this setting is limited. This study aimed to evaluate their effects on pre-colonoscopy anxiety and physiological parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized clinical study was conducted from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Amir al-Momenin Educational and Therapeutic Center in Arak, Iran. A total of 105 patients were randomly assigned to three equal-sized groups (n = 35) using block randomization: foot reflexology, hand reflexology, and a control group. Patients in the intervention groups received a 30-min reflexology session. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1), a validated tool for measuring situational anxiety. Physiological indices, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), were measured immediately before and after the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among the groups at baseline (p &gt; 0.05). However, following the intervention, the mean anxiety scores in both reflexology groups (foot reflexology: 44.39 ± 5.21; hand reflexology: 45.6 ± 4.49) were significantly lower than that of the control group (48.05 ± 4.81) (p = 0.008), as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The anxiety reduction was more pronounced in the foot reflexology group than the hand reflexology group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p &gt; 0.05). Additionally, post-intervention assessments revealed significant differences in systolic blood pressure (foot reflexology: 123.48 ± 16.40 mmHg; hand reflexology: 122.65 ± 14.97 mmHg; control group: 132.14 ± 18.48 mmHg) and heart rate (foot reflexology: 78.60 ± 9.54 bpm; hand reflexology: 78.25 ± 11.41 bpm; control group: 85.05 ± 10.82 bpm) across the groups (p &lt; 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed for diastolic blood pressure or arterial oxygen saturation (SPO2) between groups (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study indicate that reflexology, particularly foot reflexology, can significantly reduce anxiety and lead to improvements in physiological parameters, such as systolic blood pressure and heart rate, in patients undergoing colonoscopy. These results highlight the potential of reflexology as an effective complementary method for managing anxiety and enhancing patient comfort during medical procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective

Colonoscopy is a standard diagnostic procedure, yet pre-procedural anxiety remains a prevalent concern. While pharmacological interventions are available, non-pharmacological approaches such as reflexology offer a promising alternative. Despite its therapeutic potential, comparative evidence on foot and hand reflexology in this setting is limited. This study aimed to evaluate their effects on pre-colonoscopy anxiety and physiological parameters.

Methods

This randomized clinical study was conducted from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Amir al-Momenin Educational and Therapeutic Center in Arak, Iran. A total of 105 patients were randomly assigned to three equal-sized groups (n = 35) using block randomization: foot reflexology, hand reflexology, and a control group. Patients in the intervention groups received a 30-min reflexology session. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1), a validated tool for measuring situational anxiety. Physiological indices, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), were measured immediately before and after the intervention.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among the groups at baseline (p > 0.05). However, following the intervention, the mean anxiety scores in both reflexology groups (foot reflexology: 44.39 ± 5.21; hand reflexology: 45.6 ± 4.49) were significantly lower than that of the control group (48.05 ± 4.81) (p = 0.008), as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The anxiety reduction was more pronounced in the foot reflexology group than the hand reflexology group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Additionally, post-intervention assessments revealed significant differences in systolic blood pressure (foot reflexology: 123.48 ± 16.40 mmHg; hand reflexology: 122.65 ± 14.97 mmHg; control group: 132.14 ± 18.48 mmHg) and heart rate (foot reflexology: 78.60 ± 9.54 bpm; hand reflexology: 78.25 ± 11.41 bpm; control group: 85.05 ± 10.82 bpm) across the groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed for diastolic blood pressure or arterial oxygen saturation (SPO2) between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that reflexology, particularly foot reflexology, can significantly reduce anxiety and lead to improvements in physiological parameters, such as systolic blood pressure and heart rate, in patients undergoing colonoscopy. These results highlight the potential of reflexology as an effective complementary method for managing anxiety and enhancing patient comfort during medical procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
Participant recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials of melanoma surveillance: A scoping review Effects and safety of acupuncture versus non-penetrating sham acupuncture for senile pruritus: Rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial Kaat koort: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a multifactorial, multidisciplinary Aboriginal Health Practitioner-led Aboriginal dementia prevention intervention Efficacy of a parent-based treatment for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Protocol of a multiple baseline, single-case experimental design study Comparing the impact of foot and hand reflexology on anxiety and physiological indices in colonoscopy candidates: A randomized clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1