The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of premenstrual dysphoric disorder questionnaire for DSM-5

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.01.021
Shanyi Huang , Qiao Zhang , Leire Aperribai , Itziar Alonso-Arbiol , Nekane Balluerka , Ying Chen , Yuecheng Wang , Yuqun Zhang
{"title":"The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of premenstrual dysphoric disorder questionnaire for DSM-5","authors":"Shanyi Huang ,&nbsp;Qiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Leire Aperribai ,&nbsp;Itziar Alonso-Arbiol ,&nbsp;Nekane Balluerka ,&nbsp;Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Yuecheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yuqun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) seriously affects women's work and life, and early screening and diagnosis of PMDD can improve the quality of life of potential PMDD patients. The Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Questionnaire for DSM-5 (CTDP-DSM-5) is a validated screening tool for PMDD based on the DSM-5. This study intends to conduct reliability testing and validity evaluation of the scale after translation and revision in Chinese women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>669 Chinese female college students were evaluated by a set of questionnaires including the Chinese version of CTDP-DSM-5 (CTDP-C), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CTDP-C is a bi-dimensional screening instrument with 25 items. The factor structure of the CTDP-C fits well to the factor model of the original Spanish version (CFI = 0.957; TLI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.036; <em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 5983.585, <em>df</em> = 300, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The McDonald's omega reliability index obtained in this study was good (0.8) for both dimensions. In terms of convergent validity, the CTDP-C is significantly positively correlated with PSST (<em>r</em> = 0.533, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, the instrument correlates positively with depression and anxiety. Finally, the CTDP-C scores can sensitively differentiate depressed from non-depressed patients (<em>Cohen's d</em> = 0.72). Similarly, sensitively differentiated anxious from non-anxious patients (<em>Cohen's d</em> = 0.80).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CTDP-C has good validity and reliability and it is an effective screening tool to identify Chinese patients with PMDD among college students, providing a basis for early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment of PMDD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 122-126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) seriously affects women's work and life, and early screening and diagnosis of PMDD can improve the quality of life of potential PMDD patients. The Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Questionnaire for DSM-5 (CTDP-DSM-5) is a validated screening tool for PMDD based on the DSM-5. This study intends to conduct reliability testing and validity evaluation of the scale after translation and revision in Chinese women.

Methods

669 Chinese female college students were evaluated by a set of questionnaires including the Chinese version of CTDP-DSM-5 (CTDP-C), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST).

Results

CTDP-C is a bi-dimensional screening instrument with 25 items. The factor structure of the CTDP-C fits well to the factor model of the original Spanish version (CFI = 0.957; TLI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.036; χ2 = 5983.585, df = 300, p < 0.0001). The McDonald's omega reliability index obtained in this study was good (0.8) for both dimensions. In terms of convergent validity, the CTDP-C is significantly positively correlated with PSST (r = 0.533, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the instrument correlates positively with depression and anxiety. Finally, the CTDP-C scores can sensitively differentiate depressed from non-depressed patients (Cohen's d = 0.72). Similarly, sensitively differentiated anxious from non-anxious patients (Cohen's d = 0.80).

Conclusions

CTDP-C has good validity and reliability and it is an effective screening tool to identify Chinese patients with PMDD among college students, providing a basis for early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment of PMDD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DSM-5经前烦躁不安中文版问卷的信度和效度
目的经前烦躁不安症(PMDD)严重影响女性的工作和生活,早期筛查和诊断PMDD可提高潜在PMDD患者的生活质量。经前焦虑症问卷(CTDP-DSM-5)是基于DSM-5的经前焦虑症筛查工具。本研究拟对翻译修订后的量表在中国女性中进行信度检验和效度评价。方法采用中文版CTDP-DSM-5 (CTDP-C)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、一般性焦虑障碍问卷-7 (GAD-7)和经前症状筛查工具(PSST)对669名中国女大学生进行心理健康评估。结果sctdp - c是一种包含25个项目的双向筛选仪器。CTDP-C的因子结构与西班牙语原版因子模型拟合较好(CFI = 0.957;tli = 0.953;rmsea = 0.036;χ2 = 5983.585, df = 300, p <;0.0001)。本研究获得的麦当劳ω可靠性指数在两个维度上都很好(0.8)。在收敛效度方面,CTDP-C与PSST呈显著正相关(r = 0.533, p <;0.01)。此外,该工具与抑郁和焦虑呈正相关。最后,CTDP-C评分可以敏感地区分抑郁症和非抑郁症患者(Cohen’s d = 0.72)。同样,敏感地区分焦虑和非焦虑患者(Cohen’s d = 0.80)。结论sctdp - c具有良好的效度和信度,是鉴别中国大学生PMDD患者的有效筛查工具,为早期发现、早期诊断和早期治疗PMDD提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Commentary on Schettino et al.: Distinguishing psychological support from psychotherapy in psychedelic medicine - Integrating intent and behavioral frameworks. Corrigendum to "Demoralization in clinical settings: A scoping review of measurement tools and psychometric properties" [General Hospital Psychiatry 99 (2026) 159-170]. A letter to the editor critiquing the article "Psychometric validation of the German version of the somatic symptom disorder - B criteria scale (SSD-12) in a primary care population with depression and anxiety: A COSMIN-guided analysis". Letter to Editor: Suicide attempts and mood disorders following acute myocardial infarction. Re: Higher risk for elevated PTSD symptoms in patients with stroke mimics versus confirmed stroke or TIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1