Selective increases in taste sensitivity to glucose as a function of hunger status

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107901
Laura E. Martin , Juyun Lim
{"title":"Selective increases in taste sensitivity to glucose as a function of hunger status","authors":"Laura E. Martin ,&nbsp;Juyun Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glucose is critical for normal metabolic function in humans. Accordingly, the ability to sense glucose and glucose-containing saccharides is crucial for maintenance of energy homeostasis. Here, we report the evidence that glucose is perceived relatively stronger compared to fructose or sucralose when subjects are hungry. In the initial experiment, we measured the relative sensitivities between glucose and fructose when subjects were fasted vs. fed. Overnight fasted subjects (n = 22) completed a series of 3-AFC tests comparing one target (glucose from a range of concentrations) and two constants (200 mM fructose) before and after consuming mild-tasting breakfast sandwiches until satiated (738 ± 60 kcal). We found that the relative sensitivity to glucose as compared to fructose was significantly higher when individuals were hungry vs. satiated (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). We replicated this finding by comparing the same range of glucose concentrations to a constant sucralose concentration (0.04 mM) (N = 19, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Importantly, when we compared a fixed concentration of sucralose (0.4 mM) to a range of fructose concentrations, we saw no difference in iso-intense concentration before and after eating (N = 19, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that hunger selectively increases taste sensitivity of glucose compared to other sweeteners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325000534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucose is critical for normal metabolic function in humans. Accordingly, the ability to sense glucose and glucose-containing saccharides is crucial for maintenance of energy homeostasis. Here, we report the evidence that glucose is perceived relatively stronger compared to fructose or sucralose when subjects are hungry. In the initial experiment, we measured the relative sensitivities between glucose and fructose when subjects were fasted vs. fed. Overnight fasted subjects (n = 22) completed a series of 3-AFC tests comparing one target (glucose from a range of concentrations) and two constants (200 mM fructose) before and after consuming mild-tasting breakfast sandwiches until satiated (738 ± 60 kcal). We found that the relative sensitivity to glucose as compared to fructose was significantly higher when individuals were hungry vs. satiated (p < 0.001). We replicated this finding by comparing the same range of glucose concentrations to a constant sucralose concentration (0.04 mM) (N = 19, p < 0.001). Importantly, when we compared a fixed concentration of sucralose (0.4 mM) to a range of fructose concentrations, we saw no difference in iso-intense concentration before and after eating (N = 19, p > 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that hunger selectively increases taste sensitivity of glucose compared to other sweeteners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性地增加对葡萄糖的味觉敏感性作为饥饿状态的功能
葡萄糖对人体正常的代谢功能至关重要。因此,感知葡萄糖和含葡萄糖糖的能力对于维持能量稳态至关重要。在这里,我们报告的证据表明,当受试者饥饿时,葡萄糖被认为比果糖或三氯蔗糖相对更强。在最初的实验中,我们测量了受试者在禁食和进食时葡萄糖和果糖之间的相对敏感性。过夜禁食的受试者(n = 22)完成了一系列3-AFC测试,比较了一个目标(不同浓度的葡萄糖)和两个常量(200毫米果糖)在食用清淡的早餐三明治之前和之后,直到饱腹(738±60千卡)。我们发现,与果糖相比,个体在饥饿和饱腹状态下对葡萄糖的相对敏感性明显更高(p <;0.001)。我们通过比较相同范围的葡萄糖浓度与恒定的三氯蔗糖浓度(0.04 mM)来重复这一发现(N = 19, p <;0.001)。重要的是,当我们将固定浓度的三氯蔗糖(0.4 mM)与一系列果糖浓度进行比较时,我们发现进食前后的等浓度浓度没有差异(N = 19, p >;0.05)。这些发现支持了一种假设,即与其他甜味剂相比,饥饿会选择性地增加葡萄糖的味觉敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Aversion to Cultured Foods Reflects the Perceived Risk of Replicating Nature. Adolescents' Food Choice Patterns at School: A data driven approach. Halal and Healthy: A Qualitative Study of British Muslim Perspectives on Meat Consumption and Plant-based Diets. Changing portion size labels of main courses to encourage selection of smaller portions when dining out: A randomized controlled field experiment. Guiding Generation Z to Healthier Beverages: Exploratory Comparative RCT Findings on Four front-of-package Labels in a Policy-Gap Context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1