Municipal landfill site selection using TOPSIS methodology: A case study for Polatlı, Ankara, Türkiye

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s10064-025-04146-w
Gökalp Öner, Haluk Akgün, Mustafa Kerem Koçkar, Arzu Arslan Kelam
{"title":"Municipal landfill site selection using TOPSIS methodology: A case study for Polatlı, Ankara, Türkiye","authors":"Gökalp Öner,&nbsp;Haluk Akgün,&nbsp;Mustafa Kerem Koçkar,&nbsp;Arzu Arslan Kelam","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04146-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polatlı, which is the largest and tenth out of twenty fifth most populated county of Ankara is well known for being one of the most productive agricultural districts in Türkiye in terms of its barley and wheat production. However, despite that Polatlı has a relatively dense and rapidly growing population, and bears environmental problems, it does not possess a proper municipal solid waste landfill. Since the county currently lacks a proper landfill, the municipal waste is deposited in an improper open dump site that is located to the south of the county. Concerns have been raised due to fire incidents reported and due to scattering of the waste material throughout the neighborhood of the open dump site and to the other parts of the city due to the lack of fencing at the open dump site. Another environmental problem is caused by biogas energy producing companies in the district that dump their processed animal wastes in the farm fields which endangers public health. In addition, extensive illegal waste dumping in the neighborhood of the open dump site exists. The objective of this study is to select the best alternative municipal landfill site location for the Polatlı County, Ankara. To fullfil the disposal needs of the county, landfill site selection has been performed in this study by considering criteria including, air traffic safety, geology, land use, distance to settlement, distance to roads, drainage, slope, erosion, distance to fault and distance to earthquake epicenters. These criteria have been ranked and evaluated in a GIS environment prior to selecting the best alternative landfill site through “The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)” method of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The results of the landfill site selection methodology indicated that amongst the three alternative landfill sites, the best locations to construct a landfill were chosen to be those two alternative sites that were situated north northeast (NNE) and north northwest (NNW) of Polatlı, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10064-025-04146-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04146-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polatlı, which is the largest and tenth out of twenty fifth most populated county of Ankara is well known for being one of the most productive agricultural districts in Türkiye in terms of its barley and wheat production. However, despite that Polatlı has a relatively dense and rapidly growing population, and bears environmental problems, it does not possess a proper municipal solid waste landfill. Since the county currently lacks a proper landfill, the municipal waste is deposited in an improper open dump site that is located to the south of the county. Concerns have been raised due to fire incidents reported and due to scattering of the waste material throughout the neighborhood of the open dump site and to the other parts of the city due to the lack of fencing at the open dump site. Another environmental problem is caused by biogas energy producing companies in the district that dump their processed animal wastes in the farm fields which endangers public health. In addition, extensive illegal waste dumping in the neighborhood of the open dump site exists. The objective of this study is to select the best alternative municipal landfill site location for the Polatlı County, Ankara. To fullfil the disposal needs of the county, landfill site selection has been performed in this study by considering criteria including, air traffic safety, geology, land use, distance to settlement, distance to roads, drainage, slope, erosion, distance to fault and distance to earthquake epicenters. These criteria have been ranked and evaluated in a GIS environment prior to selecting the best alternative landfill site through “The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)” method of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The results of the landfill site selection methodology indicated that amongst the three alternative landfill sites, the best locations to construct a landfill were chosen to be those two alternative sites that were situated north northeast (NNE) and north northwest (NNW) of Polatlı, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用TOPSIS方法选择城市垃圾填埋场:以土耳其安卡拉的polatlati为例
polatlyi是安卡拉人口最多的25个县中最大的第10个县,以其大麦和小麦生产而闻名于 rkiye最具生产力的农业区之一。然而,尽管波拉特利亚人口相对密集,增长迅速,并承担环境问题,但它没有一个适当的城市固体废物填埋场。由于该县目前缺乏适当的垃圾填埋场,城市垃圾被存放在位于该县南部的一个不合适的露天垃圾场。由于所报告的火灾事件,以及由于露天倾倒场缺乏围栏,废料散落在整个露天倾倒场附近,并散落到城市的其他地方,引起了人们的关注。另一个环境问题是该地区的沼气能源生产公司将其处理过的动物粪便倾倒在农场,危害公众健康。此外,露天排土场附近存在大量非法倾倒废物。本研究的目的是为安卡拉的polatlati县选择最佳的市政垃圾填埋场位置。为了满足该县的处置需求,本研究考虑了以下标准:空中交通安全、地质、土地利用、到定居点的距离、到道路的距离、排水、坡度、侵蚀、到断层的距离和到地震震中的距离。在通过多标准决策分析(MCDA)的“理想解决方案相似性排序偏好技术”(TOPSIS)方法选择最佳替代填埋场之前,在GIS环境中对这些标准进行了排名和评估。填埋场选址方法结果表明,在3个备选填埋场中,最佳选址分别为位于polatlati东北偏北(NNE)和西北偏北(NNW)的两个备选填埋场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
期刊最新文献
Study on uniaxial compression characteristics and constitutive model of carbonaceous mudstone soil-rock mixture with rock block proportion and dry-wet cycle Monitoring and characteristics of formation and failure of a recurrent landslide dam: A case study of the Danan River landslide dam in Taitung, Taiwan Petrographic, physical and mechanical properties of serpentinite varieties from Ljeskovac locality, Croatia Effect of over-consolidation on damage softening behavior of expansive soil: an experimental and modeling study Estimation of soil suction from field measured water content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1