Tall Tales or Success Stories? A Scrutiny of the Business Incubation Policy and Landscape in India

IF 1.8 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Public Affairs Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/pa.70014
Sonali Gupta, D. L. Sunder
{"title":"Tall Tales or Success Stories? A Scrutiny of the Business Incubation Policy and Landscape in India","authors":"Sonali Gupta,&nbsp;D. L. Sunder","doi":"10.1002/pa.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Business incubators (BIs) have been in existence since the 1950s, and they claim to assist early-stage entrepreneurs to convert ideas into sustainable enterprises by providing resources like space, mentoring, business services, networks, and capital. Governments across the world promote BI as a policy tool, but a deep dive into the literature shows limited empirical evidence about their effectiveness. With increasing investment of public funds into incubators, it is necessary to assess their performance and success in meeting the objective of enabling new ventures. Informational roadblocks in understanding the state of business incubation can lead to convenient assumptions that all is well with the policy and practice of business incubation. This article reviews the evolution of policy, practice, and literature on Business Incubation in India and finds a vacuum with respect to systematic studies and understanding of business incubation as a process. The paper concludes by advocating for an evidence-based approach to policy formulation and emphasizes the need for rigorous evaluation and research to ascertain the true impact of BIs on India's entrepreneurial ecosystem.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business incubators (BIs) have been in existence since the 1950s, and they claim to assist early-stage entrepreneurs to convert ideas into sustainable enterprises by providing resources like space, mentoring, business services, networks, and capital. Governments across the world promote BI as a policy tool, but a deep dive into the literature shows limited empirical evidence about their effectiveness. With increasing investment of public funds into incubators, it is necessary to assess their performance and success in meeting the objective of enabling new ventures. Informational roadblocks in understanding the state of business incubation can lead to convenient assumptions that all is well with the policy and practice of business incubation. This article reviews the evolution of policy, practice, and literature on Business Incubation in India and finds a vacuum with respect to systematic studies and understanding of business incubation as a process. The paper concludes by advocating for an evidence-based approach to policy formulation and emphasizes the need for rigorous evaluation and research to ascertain the true impact of BIs on India's entrepreneurial ecosystem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荒诞故事还是成功故事?对印度企业孵化政策和前景的审视
自20世纪50年代以来,企业孵化器(BIs)就已经存在,它们声称通过提供空间、指导、商业服务、网络和资本等资源,帮助早期创业者将想法转化为可持续发展的企业。世界各国政府都将商业智能作为一种政策工具来推广,但深入研究文献表明,关于其有效性的经验证据有限。随着公共资金对孵化器的投资不断增加,有必要评估它们的业绩和是否成功地实现了促进新企业的目标。在了解企业孵化状态时遇到的信息障碍可能导致人们想当然地认为,企业孵化的政策和实践一切正常。本文回顾了印度企业孵化的政策、实践和文献的演变,并发现在系统研究和理解企业孵化作为一个过程方面存在真空。最后,本文倡导以证据为基础的政策制定方法,并强调需要进行严格的评估和研究,以确定商业投资对印度创业生态系统的真正影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
期刊最新文献
Investment in Human Capital and Subjective Well-Being in African Economies: Effect and Transmission Channels Institutional Quality and the Prioritization of Sustainable Development: Perspectives From World Economies Analysing Public Food Procurement Effectiveness in India and Implications for Food Security Local Institutions and Forest Conservation Outcomes in the Indian State of Odisha: A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Joint Forest Management and Community Forest Management The Economics of Crime and Its Implementation in Ecuador Using External Instrumental Variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1