The impact of long-acting Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy outcomes of hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer in recurrent implantation failure patients with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective clinical study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07264-1
Chenyang Huang, Yuan Yan, Jie Mei, Yue Jiang, Haixiang Sun, Jun Xing
{"title":"The impact of long-acting Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy outcomes of hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer in recurrent implantation failure patients with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective clinical study.","authors":"Chenyang Huang, Yuan Yan, Jie Mei, Yue Jiang, Haixiang Sun, Jun Xing","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07264-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have demonstrated that pre-treatment with long-acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonists (GnRHa) can significantly enhance the clinical pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients. Investigations have also suggested that GnRHa pre-treatment could ameliorate the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. But there is a dearth of research on whether long-acting GnRHa pre-treatment yields superior clinical outcomes for RIF patients with PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study enrolled 1602 patients under the age of 40 meeting the criteria for RIF at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between January 2017 and December 2021. All cycles were categorized into hormone replacement therapy (HRT) Group (n = 1283) and GnRHa-HRT Group (n = 319), contingent on the usage of long-acting GnRHa pretreatment. Primary outcomes investigated in this study was clinical pregnancy rate, while live birth rate and early miscarriage rate were deemed as secondary outcomes. Univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model were employed to assess the impact of GnRHa pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy rate in RIF patients. The influence of long-acting GnRHa pretreatment on clinical pregnancy outcomes was re-examined in PCOS and non-PCOS subgroups. Additionally, an interaction analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of PCOS on the relationship between long-acting GnRHa pretreatment and the clinical pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression analysis showed that long-acting GnRHa pretreatment had a positive impact on the clinical pregnancy rate (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.15-1.99, P = 0.003). We divided the RIF population into two subgroups, for PCOS patients, although the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in women who received GnRHa pretreatment compared to those who did not, it was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 0.81-2.82, P = 0.195). Interaction analysis suggested that for PCOS patients, there was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate between women who received GnRHa pretreatment and those who did not (P interaction = 0.818), indicating that the effect of GnRHa pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy rate was not influenced by PCOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that long-acting GnRHa pretreatment can enhance clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF. Among RIF patients without PCOS, the clinical pregnancy rate exhibited a significant increase following GnRHa pretreatment compared to the control group. However, in RIF patients with concurrent PCOS, there was no significant elevation in the clinical pregnancy rate post-GnRHa pretreatment. Therefore, GnRHa pretreatment is effective in improving pregnancy outcomes for RIF patients. However, whether GnRHa pretreatment is suitable for RIF patients with PCOS requires more cautious clinical discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07264-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that pre-treatment with long-acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonists (GnRHa) can significantly enhance the clinical pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients. Investigations have also suggested that GnRHa pre-treatment could ameliorate the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. But there is a dearth of research on whether long-acting GnRHa pre-treatment yields superior clinical outcomes for RIF patients with PCOS.

Methods: The retrospective study enrolled 1602 patients under the age of 40 meeting the criteria for RIF at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between January 2017 and December 2021. All cycles were categorized into hormone replacement therapy (HRT) Group (n = 1283) and GnRHa-HRT Group (n = 319), contingent on the usage of long-acting GnRHa pretreatment. Primary outcomes investigated in this study was clinical pregnancy rate, while live birth rate and early miscarriage rate were deemed as secondary outcomes. Univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model were employed to assess the impact of GnRHa pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy rate in RIF patients. The influence of long-acting GnRHa pretreatment on clinical pregnancy outcomes was re-examined in PCOS and non-PCOS subgroups. Additionally, an interaction analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of PCOS on the relationship between long-acting GnRHa pretreatment and the clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: Multiple regression analysis showed that long-acting GnRHa pretreatment had a positive impact on the clinical pregnancy rate (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.15-1.99, P = 0.003). We divided the RIF population into two subgroups, for PCOS patients, although the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in women who received GnRHa pretreatment compared to those who did not, it was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 0.81-2.82, P = 0.195). Interaction analysis suggested that for PCOS patients, there was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate between women who received GnRHa pretreatment and those who did not (P interaction = 0.818), indicating that the effect of GnRHa pretreatment on the clinical pregnancy rate was not influenced by PCOS.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that long-acting GnRHa pretreatment can enhance clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF. Among RIF patients without PCOS, the clinical pregnancy rate exhibited a significant increase following GnRHa pretreatment compared to the control group. However, in RIF patients with concurrent PCOS, there was no significant elevation in the clinical pregnancy rate post-GnRHa pretreatment. Therefore, GnRHa pretreatment is effective in improving pregnancy outcomes for RIF patients. However, whether GnRHa pretreatment is suitable for RIF patients with PCOS requires more cautious clinical discussion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂预处理对多囊卵巢综合征和非多囊卵巢综合征反复植入失败患者激素替代疗法-冷冻胚胎移植临床妊娠结局的影响:一项回顾性临床研究。
背景:多项研究表明,长期使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)可显著提高复发性着床失败(RIF)患者的临床妊娠率。研究还表明,GnRHa预处理可改善多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的临床妊娠率和活产率。但是,对于长期GnRHa预处理是否能为RIF合并PCOS患者带来更好的临床结果,缺乏研究。方法:回顾性研究纳入南京鼓楼医院生殖医学中心2017年1月至2021年12月期间接受冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)治疗的1602例40岁以下符合RIF标准的患者。根据使用长效GnRHa预处理,将所有周期分为激素替代治疗(HRT)组(n = 1283)和GnRHa-HRT组(n = 319)。本研究调查的主要结局是临床妊娠率,而活产率和早期流产率被视为次要结局。采用单因素分析和多因素logistic回归模型评估GnRHa预处理对RIF患者临床妊娠率的影响。在PCOS和非PCOS亚组中重新检查长效GnRHa预处理对临床妊娠结局的影响。并进行交互作用分析,评价PCOS对长效GnRHa预处理与临床妊娠率的影响。结果:多元回归分析显示,长效GnRHa预处理对临床妊娠率有正向影响(aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.15 ~ 1.99, P = 0.003)。我们将RIF人群分为两个亚组,对于PCOS患者,虽然接受GnRHa预处理的女性临床妊娠率高于未接受GnRHa预处理的女性,但差异无统计学意义(aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 0.81-2.82, P = 0.195)。交互作用分析显示,对于PCOS患者,接受GnRHa预处理与未接受GnRHa预处理的临床妊娠率差异无统计学意义(P交互作用= 0.818),说明GnRHa预处理对临床妊娠率的影响不受PCOS的影响。结论:我们的研究表明,长效GnRHa预处理可以改善RIF患者的临床妊娠结局。在没有PCOS的RIF患者中,GnRHa预处理后的临床妊娠率较对照组显著增加。然而,在合并PCOS的RIF患者中,gnrha预处理后的临床妊娠率没有显著升高。因此,GnRHa预处理对改善RIF患者妊娠结局是有效的。然而,GnRHa预处理是否适用于RIF合并PCOS的患者,需要更加谨慎的临床讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Development of the cyberchondria severity scale in pregnancy (CSS-P). ABOVE: cerclage after caesarean: protocol for a randomised controlled trial to assess the optimal preventative management for preterm birth secondary to caesarean section damage. Elective induction versus expectant management for suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Measuring emotion dysregulation in pregnancy using smartphone activity: a prospective research study in the United States. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nurses and midwives on maternity triage in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study in two urban hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1