Barriers and facilitators for mHealth utilization in pregnancy care: a qualitative analysis of pregnant women and stakeholder's perspectives.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07244-5
Fateme Asadollahi, Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami, Saeid Eslami, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for mHealth utilization in pregnancy care: a qualitative analysis of pregnant women and stakeholder's perspectives.","authors":"Fateme Asadollahi, Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami, Saeid Eslami, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07244-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) technologies offer potential benefits for enhancing pregnancy care through timely information and personalized support. Yet, various barriers limit their adoption among pregnant women. This study explored the perspectives of Iranian pregnant women and healthcare stakeholders on the barriers and facilitators influencing mHealth utilization in pregnancy care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative content analysis was conducted involving 21 participants including 14 pregnant women and seven healthcare stakeholders (including two obstetricians, two midwives, two medical informatics specialists, and one sociologist), who recruited via purposive sampling from hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and private clinics in Northeast Iran from May to December 2023. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Hsieh and Shannon's (2005) conventional content analysis approach. Trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, researcher's prolonged engagement, peer debriefing, member check, and audit trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main theme, \"Barriers and facilitators for mhealth utilization in pregnancy care,\" encompassed four key categories including (1) Digital ecosystem challenges highlighting structural issues like inadequate infrastructure, economic constraints, cultural adaptation gaps, interface complexity, and data security concerns, (2) Healthcare system implementation barriers including integration issues, low digital literacy, and a lack of continuity with traditional healthcare practices, (3) User empowerment and engagement revealing that mHealth can enhance access to information, promote autonomy, and provide personalized support, and (4) Integration of mHealth in the Healthcare system demonstrating the transformative potential of mHealth for improving maternal health monitoring, communication, and evidence-based care strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing digital, financial, and cultural barriers while enhancing usability and user autonomy could significantly improve healthcare access and equity for pregnant women in Iran. Policymakers should prioritize scalable and culturally sensitive mHealth interventions to maximize these benefits across diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07244-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies offer potential benefits for enhancing pregnancy care through timely information and personalized support. Yet, various barriers limit their adoption among pregnant women. This study explored the perspectives of Iranian pregnant women and healthcare stakeholders on the barriers and facilitators influencing mHealth utilization in pregnancy care.

Methods: A qualitative content analysis was conducted involving 21 participants including 14 pregnant women and seven healthcare stakeholders (including two obstetricians, two midwives, two medical informatics specialists, and one sociologist), who recruited via purposive sampling from hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and private clinics in Northeast Iran from May to December 2023. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Hsieh and Shannon's (2005) conventional content analysis approach. Trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, researcher's prolonged engagement, peer debriefing, member check, and audit trial.

Results: The main theme, "Barriers and facilitators for mhealth utilization in pregnancy care," encompassed four key categories including (1) Digital ecosystem challenges highlighting structural issues like inadequate infrastructure, economic constraints, cultural adaptation gaps, interface complexity, and data security concerns, (2) Healthcare system implementation barriers including integration issues, low digital literacy, and a lack of continuity with traditional healthcare practices, (3) User empowerment and engagement revealing that mHealth can enhance access to information, promote autonomy, and provide personalized support, and (4) Integration of mHealth in the Healthcare system demonstrating the transformative potential of mHealth for improving maternal health monitoring, communication, and evidence-based care strategies.

Conclusion: Addressing digital, financial, and cultural barriers while enhancing usability and user autonomy could significantly improve healthcare access and equity for pregnant women in Iran. Policymakers should prioritize scalable and culturally sensitive mHealth interventions to maximize these benefits across diverse communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠护理中使用移动医疗的障碍和促进因素:对孕妇和利益相关者观点的定性分析。
背景:移动医疗(mHealth)技术通过及时的信息和个性化的支持,为加强妊娠护理提供了潜在的好处。然而,各种各样的障碍限制了孕妇采用它们。本研究探讨了伊朗孕妇和保健利益攸关方对影响移动保健在妊娠护理中使用的障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:对2023年5 - 12月在伊朗东北部马什哈德医科大学附属医院和私人诊所进行有目的抽样的21名参与者进行定性内容分析,其中包括14名孕妇和7名医疗保健利益相关者(包括2名产科医生、2名助产士、2名医学信息学专家和1名社会学家)。通过半结构化的深度访谈收集数据,并使用Hsieh和Shannon(2005)的传统内容分析方法进行分析。通过三角测量、研究人员长期参与、同行评议、成员核查、审计试用等方式确保可信度。结果:本次会议的主题是“妊娠护理中利用移动医疗的障碍和促进因素”,包括四个关键类别,包括(1)数字生态系统挑战,突出结构性问题,如基础设施不足、经济约束、文化适应差距、界面复杂性和数据安全问题;(2)医疗保健系统实施障碍,包括集成问题、数字素养低、缺乏与传统医疗保健实践的连续性;(3)用户赋权和参与,表明移动医疗可以增强信息获取。(4)将移动医疗整合到医疗保健系统中,展示移动医疗在改善孕产妇健康监测、沟通和循证护理战略方面的变革潜力。结论:在提高可用性和用户自主权的同时,解决数字、财务和文化障碍可以显著改善伊朗孕妇的医疗保健机会和公平性。政策制定者应优先考虑可扩展和具有文化敏感性的移动医疗干预措施,以便在不同的社区中最大限度地发挥这些效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Endometrial tuberculosis increases miscarriage risk after IVF/ICSI compared with non-specific chronic endometritis. Parameters of the thrombin generation test in pregnant women with preeclampsia: a systematic review. Physiotherapist-led ultrasound-guided visual biofeedback prelabor training: a randomised controlled trial. Improving maternity and neonatal care in England: protocol for a formative evaluation of the implementation of the core competency framework to enhance multi-professional practice. -Impact of first-trimester preeclampsia screening on perinatal and maternal morbidity: the RANSPRE open multicenter randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1