["How to get your Doxy-PEP?": vulnerabilities and critical routes encountered by men in the therapeutic itinerary in Brazil].

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Cadernos de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102-311XPT058524
Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Anderson Reis de Sousa
{"title":"[\"How to get your Doxy-PEP?\": vulnerabilities and critical routes encountered by men in the therapeutic itinerary in Brazil].","authors":"Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Anderson Reis de Sousa","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XPT058524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the context of doxycycline-based post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) use for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil. A qualitative study was conducted with 32 MSM participants, selected on social media. Data was collected by online questionnaires, which included open-ended questions about experiences with Doxy-PEP, access to medications, and interactions with the health care system. Responses were analyzed using the IRaMuTeQ program for descending hierarchical classification and reflective thematic analysis. The results revealed three main categories: (1) access to and management of post-exposure prophylaxis, in which participants reported difficulties in obtaining Doxy-PEP due to prescribing restrictions and lack of information; (2) perceptions and knowledge on risks and prevention, which highlighted a mix of knowledge and misinformation about STIs and prevention strategies; (3) social and behavioral dynamics, demonstrating how social interactions and stigma influence prevention practices. The study also indicated self-medication and drug storage as common practices. The study identified multiple barriers to access and management of Doxy-PEP among MSM in Brazil, influenced by individual, social, and programmatic factors. It is imperative to develop public health strategies that improve access to and information about Doxy-PEP among MSM, as well as approaches that reduce STIs-associated stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"40 12","pages":"e00058524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT058524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the context of doxycycline-based post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) use for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil. A qualitative study was conducted with 32 MSM participants, selected on social media. Data was collected by online questionnaires, which included open-ended questions about experiences with Doxy-PEP, access to medications, and interactions with the health care system. Responses were analyzed using the IRaMuTeQ program for descending hierarchical classification and reflective thematic analysis. The results revealed three main categories: (1) access to and management of post-exposure prophylaxis, in which participants reported difficulties in obtaining Doxy-PEP due to prescribing restrictions and lack of information; (2) perceptions and knowledge on risks and prevention, which highlighted a mix of knowledge and misinformation about STIs and prevention strategies; (3) social and behavioral dynamics, demonstrating how social interactions and stigma influence prevention practices. The study also indicated self-medication and drug storage as common practices. The study identified multiple barriers to access and management of Doxy-PEP among MSM in Brazil, influenced by individual, social, and programmatic factors. It is imperative to develop public health strategies that improve access to and information about Doxy-PEP among MSM, as well as approaches that reduce STIs-associated stigma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cadernos de saude publica
Cadernos de saude publica 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
356
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ). The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care. All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.
期刊最新文献
[Access of children with congenital Zika virus syndrome to public policies]. [Assessment of birth registration coverage in the Hospital Information System of the Brazilian Unified National Health System, by hospital of admission, Brazil, 2012-2020]. ["How to get your Doxy-PEP?": vulnerabilities and critical routes encountered by men in the therapeutic itinerary in Brazil]. [Association between food insecurity and infant development at age 18 months in the urban area of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil]. [Food insecurity, environment, and habitability in households in urban and rural areas of Brazil].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1