Effect of modified surgical conditions on the peripapillary microvasculature and RNFL in patients receiving vitrectomy: an OCTA study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03832-9
Ting Pan, Cunxin Bian, Yuan Fang, Jingfan Wang, Yidan Xu, Ping Xie, Zizhong Hu
{"title":"Effect of modified surgical conditions on the peripapillary microvasculature and RNFL in patients receiving vitrectomy: an OCTA study.","authors":"Ting Pan, Cunxin Bian, Yuan Fang, Jingfan Wang, Yidan Xu, Ping Xie, Zizhong Hu","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03832-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is an effective treatment of vitreoretinal diseases, while some studies reported visual field defects after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effects of modified vitrectomy surgical conditions on peripapillary microvasculature and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) changes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospectively study and the medical records of 37 patients diagnosed with iERM or iMH underwent PPV with ILM peeling were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical conditions. Peripapillary OCTA images were acquired at pre-operation, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-operation. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with Goldman applanation tonometer. Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test, t test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) were used to analyze our data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary metrics found was the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) small vessel density. The RPC in the protective group was significantly increased compared with the control group after surgery. At 3 months after vitrectomy, the mean and superior quadrant peripapillary RNFL thickness in the protective group was significantly higher than those in the control group. BCVA was improved in both groups at 3 months after surgery. BCVA and IOP did not differ significantly between these two groups pre- and post-operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitrectomy with ILM peeling may cause peripapillary microvascular and RNFL damage. The application of a modified surgical conditions may do some help in the recovery of peripapillary blood flow and peripapillary RNFL thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03832-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is an effective treatment of vitreoretinal diseases, while some studies reported visual field defects after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effects of modified vitrectomy surgical conditions on peripapillary microvasculature and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) changes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods: This was a retrospectively study and the medical records of 37 patients diagnosed with iERM or iMH underwent PPV with ILM peeling were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical conditions. Peripapillary OCTA images were acquired at pre-operation, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-operation. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with Goldman applanation tonometer. Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test, t test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) were used to analyze our data.

Results: The primary metrics found was the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) small vessel density. The RPC in the protective group was significantly increased compared with the control group after surgery. At 3 months after vitrectomy, the mean and superior quadrant peripapillary RNFL thickness in the protective group was significantly higher than those in the control group. BCVA was improved in both groups at 3 months after surgery. BCVA and IOP did not differ significantly between these two groups pre- and post-operation.

Conclusion: Vitrectomy with ILM peeling may cause peripapillary microvascular and RNFL damage. The application of a modified surgical conditions may do some help in the recovery of peripapillary blood flow and peripapillary RNFL thickness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of factors on the space between the posterior capsule and IOL. Comparative evaluation of phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechi-alysis with goniotomy versus trabeculectomy in patients with angle-closure glaucoma and cataract. Correlation of contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies with myopic shift in Chinese children. Management of fracture and displacement of a previously successful bilateral transconjunctival ab-externo XEN gel stent: a case report. Diurnal variations in corneal biomechanics in healthy young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1