Risk factors for interval breast cancer: insights from a decade of a mammography screening program.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07619-4
Jonas Subelack, Rudolf Morant, Marcel Blum, Alena Eichenberger, Alexander Geissler, David Ehlig
{"title":"Risk factors for interval breast cancer: insights from a decade of a mammography screening program.","authors":"Jonas Subelack, Rudolf Morant, Marcel Blum, Alena Eichenberger, Alexander Geissler, David Ehlig","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07619-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major global health issue, with mammography screening programs (MSPs) being critical for early detection to improve survival. Interval breast cancers (IBC) are an important quality criterion and have been linked with increased mortality. We aimed to identify risk factors for IBC diagnoses, based on MSP data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we merged data from the Swiss MSP \"donna\" with data from cancer registries from 2010 to 2019 to categorize cases as IBC or screen-detected breast cancer (SBC). We compared the incidence, tumor characteristics, and survival proportions of women with IBC versus SBC. We used a multivariable Poisson regression with robust errors to identify risk factors for IBC diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1134 breast cancer cases, specifically 251 IBC and 883 SBC. The 7-year survival proportions significantly deviated with 92.9% for women with IBC and 96.4% for women with SBC (p < 0.05). Women with IBC are diagnosed with significantly higher tumor stages (p < 0.05) and have a worse tumor biology in multiple dimensions e.g. larger tumor size or more often triple negative (p < 0.05). Higher breast density (BI-RADS d risk ratio (RR): 3.293), certain age groups (55-59 years RR: 1.345), and a family breast cancer history (RR: 1.299) were identified as significant (p < 0.05) risk factors for IBC diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with IBC had lower overall survival proportions than women with SBC, possibly due to higher stages at diagnosis. Increased breast density and a positive family history of breast cancer could encourage MSPs to personalize their screening process (e.g. additional diagnostics).</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07619-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer remains a major global health issue, with mammography screening programs (MSPs) being critical for early detection to improve survival. Interval breast cancers (IBC) are an important quality criterion and have been linked with increased mortality. We aimed to identify risk factors for IBC diagnoses, based on MSP data.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we merged data from the Swiss MSP "donna" with data from cancer registries from 2010 to 2019 to categorize cases as IBC or screen-detected breast cancer (SBC). We compared the incidence, tumor characteristics, and survival proportions of women with IBC versus SBC. We used a multivariable Poisson regression with robust errors to identify risk factors for IBC diagnoses.

Results: We identified 1134 breast cancer cases, specifically 251 IBC and 883 SBC. The 7-year survival proportions significantly deviated with 92.9% for women with IBC and 96.4% for women with SBC (p < 0.05). Women with IBC are diagnosed with significantly higher tumor stages (p < 0.05) and have a worse tumor biology in multiple dimensions e.g. larger tumor size or more often triple negative (p < 0.05). Higher breast density (BI-RADS d risk ratio (RR): 3.293), certain age groups (55-59 years RR: 1.345), and a family breast cancer history (RR: 1.299) were identified as significant (p < 0.05) risk factors for IBC diagnoses.

Conclusions: Women with IBC had lower overall survival proportions than women with SBC, possibly due to higher stages at diagnosis. Increased breast density and a positive family history of breast cancer could encourage MSPs to personalize their screening process (e.g. additional diagnostics).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Long-term benefits of exercise interventions during chemotherapy in breast cancer: insights from the optitrain trial calling for longitudinal studies. Malignant upgrade in lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions) - is open excision always necessary? Prolonged time to breast cancer surgery and the risk of metastasis: an explorative simulation analysis using epidemiological data from Germany and the USA. IHC4 and COMBINE scores for enhanced prognostic stratification in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Outcomes of the Saudi breast cancer early detection program: a nine-year analysis (2012-2020).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1