Exploring the relationship between grip strength and diabetic nephropathy among U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12902-025-01862-y
Xue Chen, Yi Lin, Weisong Dong, Xiuxiu Wen, Yidan Zuo
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between grip strength and diabetic nephropathy among U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis.","authors":"Xue Chen, Yi Lin, Weisong Dong, Xiuxiu Wen, Yidan Zuo","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01862-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between grip strength (GS) and diabetic nephropathy (DN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus collected between 2011 and 2014 were obtained from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Demographic characteristics (sex, age, race, marital status, and educational level), clinical measures (smoking status, drinking status, body mass index [BMI], glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], urinary albumin creatinine ratio [UACR], diabetes duration, and hypertension), and grip strength assessments were collected. The relationship between GS and DN was analyzed using a logistic regression model. Subgroup analyses were showed as forest plots, conducted while accounting for confounding variables. Restricted cubic splines were applied to investigate nonlinear correlations. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1,539 participants. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the odds ratios (ORs) were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) in male and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) in female. Compared with those in the lowest quartiles, participants in the uppermost GS quartiles were less susceptible to DN in male [OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.62)] and female [OR 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20-0.67)] (p for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for all variables, the ORs were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) in male and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) in female. Compared with those in the lowest quartiles, participants in the uppermost GS quartiles were less susceptible to DN in male [OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.62)] (p for trend < 0.001) and female [OR 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20-0.67)] (p for trend < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a reliable connection between GS and DN (all p for interaction > 0.05). We discovered a nonlinear relationship between GS and DN in both male and female participants (all p for nonlinearity < 0.05). More precisely, the data revealed L-shaped relationship and inverted-S relation in male and female participants, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this cross-sectional study using NHANES data indicated a potential negative association between GS and DN. Additional extensive studies are necessary to elucidate these trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01862-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the relationship between grip strength (GS) and diabetic nephropathy (DN).

Materials and methods: Data on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus collected between 2011 and 2014 were obtained from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Demographic characteristics (sex, age, race, marital status, and educational level), clinical measures (smoking status, drinking status, body mass index [BMI], glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], urinary albumin creatinine ratio [UACR], diabetes duration, and hypertension), and grip strength assessments were collected. The relationship between GS and DN was analyzed using a logistic regression model. Subgroup analyses were showed as forest plots, conducted while accounting for confounding variables. Restricted cubic splines were applied to investigate nonlinear correlations. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results: This study included 1,539 participants. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the odds ratios (ORs) were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) in male and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) in female. Compared with those in the lowest quartiles, participants in the uppermost GS quartiles were less susceptible to DN in male [OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.62)] and female [OR 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20-0.67)] (p for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for all variables, the ORs were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) in male and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98) in female. Compared with those in the lowest quartiles, participants in the uppermost GS quartiles were less susceptible to DN in male [OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.62)] (p for trend < 0.001) and female [OR 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20-0.67)] (p for trend < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a reliable connection between GS and DN (all p for interaction > 0.05). We discovered a nonlinear relationship between GS and DN in both male and female participants (all p for nonlinearity < 0.05). More precisely, the data revealed L-shaped relationship and inverted-S relation in male and female participants, respectively.

Conclusion: The results of this cross-sectional study using NHANES data indicated a potential negative association between GS and DN. Additional extensive studies are necessary to elucidate these trends.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨美国成人2型糖尿病患者握力与糖尿病肾病的关系:一项横断面NHANES分析
目的:探讨握力(GS)与糖尿病肾病(DN)的关系。材料与方法:2011 - 2014年2型糖尿病患者数据来源于国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)。收集人口统计学特征(性别、年龄、种族、婚姻状况和教育水平)、临床指标(吸烟状况、饮酒状况、体重指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、尿白蛋白肌酐比(UACR)、糖尿病病程、高血压)和握力评估。采用logistic回归模型分析GS与DN之间的关系。亚组分析显示为森林图,在考虑混杂变量的情况下进行。限制三次样条用于研究非线性相关性。进行敏感性分析以评估研究结果的稳健性。结果:本研究共纳入1539名受试者。在多因素logistic回归模型中,男性的优势比为0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98),女性的优势比为0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98)。与最低四分位数的参与者相比,最高GS四分位数的参与者在男性[OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.62)]和女性[OR 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20-0.67)]中更不容易患DN (p为趋势0.05)。我们发现,在男性和女性参与者中,GS和DN之间存在非线性关系(非线性均为p)。结论:使用NHANES数据的横断面研究结果表明,GS和DN之间存在潜在的负相关。需要进一步的广泛研究来阐明这些趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene variants on adult obesity and overweight: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Association of serum uric acid and serum uric acid/creatinine ratio with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in young adults: a retrospective study. The body mass index-glucose index as a new tool for early detection of the risk of dysglycemia in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Predictive value of three insulin resistance surrogate indices for symptomatic hypoglycemia risk in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. The effect of metabolic bariatric surgery on Anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1