The effect of frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia on maternal nipple pain - a systematic review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.61409/A06240378
Lærke Nørgaard Albertsen, Therese Ovesen
{"title":"The effect of frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia on maternal nipple pain - a systematic review.","authors":"Lærke Nørgaard Albertsen, Therese Ovesen","doi":"10.61409/A06240378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ankyloglossia in breastfeeding infants has been proposed to cause maternal nipple pain. Lingual frenotomy has been cited to reduce maternal nipple pain. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate if frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia and breastfeeding problems reduces maternal nipple pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search for RCTs comparing frenotomy to a sham procedure or usual care in mother-infant dyads with ankyloglossia and maternal nipple pain. Maternal nipple pain was registered as the main outcome. We conducted a meta-analysis and assessed the risk of bias using Rob 2.0 and the quality of evidence, adopting the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs were included in the review. Three RCTs were used for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant pre-post intervention reduction in maternal nipple pain in the frenotomy group compared with the comparison group: mean difference = -1.23; 95% confidence interval: -1.88 to -0.57. The overall bias was assessed to range from \"some concerns\" to \"high\". The quality of evidence for the assessed outcome, maternal nipple pain, was classified as \"low\" to \"very low\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that frenotomy reduced maternal nipple pain in the short term. Despite being statistically significant, the clinical relevance of a 1.2-point reduction on a ten-point VAS must be questioned. Due to a considerable risk of bias along with a low study quality, the definitive benefit of frenotomy on maternal nipple pain remains unproven. Hence, quality large-scale RCTs are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A06240378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ankyloglossia in breastfeeding infants has been proposed to cause maternal nipple pain. Lingual frenotomy has been cited to reduce maternal nipple pain. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate if frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia and breastfeeding problems reduces maternal nipple pain.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for RCTs comparing frenotomy to a sham procedure or usual care in mother-infant dyads with ankyloglossia and maternal nipple pain. Maternal nipple pain was registered as the main outcome. We conducted a meta-analysis and assessed the risk of bias using Rob 2.0 and the quality of evidence, adopting the GRADE approach.

Results: Five RCTs were included in the review. Three RCTs were used for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant pre-post intervention reduction in maternal nipple pain in the frenotomy group compared with the comparison group: mean difference = -1.23; 95% confidence interval: -1.88 to -0.57. The overall bias was assessed to range from "some concerns" to "high". The quality of evidence for the assessed outcome, maternal nipple pain, was classified as "low" to "very low".

Conclusions: We found that frenotomy reduced maternal nipple pain in the short term. Despite being statistically significant, the clinical relevance of a 1.2-point reduction on a ten-point VAS must be questioned. Due to a considerable risk of bias along with a low study quality, the definitive benefit of frenotomy on maternal nipple pain remains unproven. Hence, quality large-scale RCTs are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries and association with cervical spine injury. Components of eye health checks provided by optician retail stores in Denmark. The effect of frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia on maternal nipple pain - a systematic review. Arterial pH and short-term mortality in adult non-traumatic acute patients. ChatGPT versus physician-derived answers to drug-related questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1