Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS®) and continuous renal replacement therapy for the treatment of paediatric acute liver failure - two-centre retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s00431-025-06013-y
Romit Saxena, Emma C Alexander, Sander Bontemps, Raman Singla, Henkjan J Verkade, Vincent E de Meijer, Martin C J Kneyber, Akash Deep
{"title":"Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS®) and continuous renal replacement therapy for the treatment of paediatric acute liver failure - two-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Romit Saxena, Emma C Alexander, Sander Bontemps, Raman Singla, Henkjan J Verkade, Vincent E de Meijer, Martin C J Kneyber, Akash Deep","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06013-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To describe outcomes of a cohort of patients with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) treated with either one of two extracorporeal therapies (ECT) - continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and molecular adsorbent recirculatory system (MARS®). Retrospective, observational, cohort study at two European paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) - UK (2006-2017, CRRT) and the Netherlands (2003-2017, MARS® and CRRT). Patients were children (0-18 years) admitted to the PICU with PALF who required CRRT or MARS®. Between each group, we compared baseline characteristics, biochemical parameters at 0 and 24 h after commencing MARS®/CRRT, and clinical outcomes. In total, 95 patients (23 MARS®, 72 CRRT) were included. The median age at admission for the whole cohort was 4.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-12.1), and 47/95 (49.5%) of patients had an indeterminate aetiology. A lower proportion of patients in the MARS® group were on inotropes or were ventilated at admission, and they had a lower Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk % than the CRRT group (14.5% (7.5-22) vs 20.4% (16.8-26.4), p = 0.002). After treatment, there were no significant differences detected between groups in survival with native liver, or overall survival (15/23 (65.2%) for MARS® and 49/72 (68.1%) for CRRT, p = 0.998).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not detect a significant difference in clinical outcomes between PALF patients treated with CRRT or MARS®, despite a relatively sicker cohort in the CRRT group. Further high-quality evidence is necessary regarding the role of extracorporeal therapies in PALF, with consideration of clinical outcomes, feasibility, and cost.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Outcomes for children with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) have improved in recent years secondary to improved supportive care aimed at avoiding liver transplantation. • Extracorporeal therapies, in particular continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), are increasingly applied in the management of these children; however few studies have compared outcomes between different extracorporeal therapies.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• In this retrospective study across two centres, outcomes between patients with PALF treated with CRRT were compared to patients treated with MARS®. • There was no significant difference in key clinical outcomes between groups, including survival with native liver and overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 3","pages":"192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06013-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To describe outcomes of a cohort of patients with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) treated with either one of two extracorporeal therapies (ECT) - continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and molecular adsorbent recirculatory system (MARS®). Retrospective, observational, cohort study at two European paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) - UK (2006-2017, CRRT) and the Netherlands (2003-2017, MARS® and CRRT). Patients were children (0-18 years) admitted to the PICU with PALF who required CRRT or MARS®. Between each group, we compared baseline characteristics, biochemical parameters at 0 and 24 h after commencing MARS®/CRRT, and clinical outcomes. In total, 95 patients (23 MARS®, 72 CRRT) were included. The median age at admission for the whole cohort was 4.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-12.1), and 47/95 (49.5%) of patients had an indeterminate aetiology. A lower proportion of patients in the MARS® group were on inotropes or were ventilated at admission, and they had a lower Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk % than the CRRT group (14.5% (7.5-22) vs 20.4% (16.8-26.4), p = 0.002). After treatment, there were no significant differences detected between groups in survival with native liver, or overall survival (15/23 (65.2%) for MARS® and 49/72 (68.1%) for CRRT, p = 0.998).

Conclusion: We did not detect a significant difference in clinical outcomes between PALF patients treated with CRRT or MARS®, despite a relatively sicker cohort in the CRRT group. Further high-quality evidence is necessary regarding the role of extracorporeal therapies in PALF, with consideration of clinical outcomes, feasibility, and cost.

What is known: • Outcomes for children with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) have improved in recent years secondary to improved supportive care aimed at avoiding liver transplantation. • Extracorporeal therapies, in particular continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), are increasingly applied in the management of these children; however few studies have compared outcomes between different extracorporeal therapies.

What is new: • In this retrospective study across two centres, outcomes between patients with PALF treated with CRRT were compared to patients treated with MARS®. • There was no significant difference in key clinical outcomes between groups, including survival with native liver and overall survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子吸附剂再循环系统(MARS®)和持续肾脏替代疗法治疗儿童急性肝衰竭-双中心回顾性队列研究
描述一组接受两种体外疗法(ECT)——持续肾替代疗法(CRRT)和分子吸附剂再循环系统(MARS®)之一治疗的儿科急性肝衰竭(PALF)患者的结果。回顾性、观察性、队列研究在两个欧洲儿科重症监护病房(picu)——英国(2006-2017,CRRT)和荷兰(2003-2017,MARS®和CRRT)。患者为PICU收治的PALF患儿(0-18岁),需要CRRT或MARS®。在每组之间,我们比较了基线特征、开始MARS®/CRRT后0和24小时的生化参数和临床结果。共纳入95例患者(23例MARS®,72例CRRT)。整个队列入院时的中位年龄为4.3岁(四分位间距(IQR) 1.0-12.1), 47/95(49.5%)患者的病因不明。MARS®组患者在入院时使用收缩性药物或进行通气的比例较低,其儿科死亡率指数风险%低于CRRT组(14.5% (7.5-22)vs 20.4% (16.8-26.4), p = 0.002)。治疗后,两组间天然肝生存率或总生存率无显著差异(MARS®组15/23 (65.2%),CRRT组49/72 (68.1%),p = 0.998)。结论:我们没有发现接受CRRT或MARS®治疗的PALF患者的临床结果有显著差异,尽管CRRT组中有相对较重的队列。考虑到临床结果、可行性和成本,需要进一步的高质量证据来证明体外治疗在PALF中的作用。•近年来,由于旨在避免肝移植的支持性护理的改善,小儿急性肝衰竭(PALF)患儿的预后有所改善。•体外治疗,特别是持续肾替代治疗(CRRT),越来越多地应用于这些儿童的治疗;然而,很少有研究比较不同体外治疗的结果。新发现:•在这项跨两个中心的回顾性研究中,将接受CRRT治疗的PALF患者与接受MARS®治疗的患者的预后进行了比较。•两组之间的关键临床结局无显著差异,包括原生肝生存和总生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Mobile health applications for parents of children with Hirschsprung disease: a requirement analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis and infection risk in pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evaluation of sleep quality, social-emotional development, and parental stress levels of children with atopic dermatitis. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The prevalence of obesity and hypertension in paediatric cardiology patients before and after COVID-19 lockdown measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1