Intraoperative frozen section examination for penile cancer surgery: a systematic review

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Impotence Research Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1038/s41443-025-01024-7
Mohammad Z. Yunis, Karl H. Pang, Asif Muneer, Hussain M. Alnajjar
{"title":"Intraoperative frozen section examination for penile cancer surgery: a systematic review","authors":"Mohammad Z. Yunis, Karl H. Pang, Asif Muneer, Hussain M. Alnajjar","doi":"10.1038/s41443-025-01024-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare but aggressive and life changing. Penile-preserving surgery (PPS) allows length preservation for sexual activity and normal voiding. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) of resection margins helps to decide on how much penile tissue is excised. Oncological outcomes and diagnostic accuracy of FSE to date, however, are not well documented. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of FSE in the treatment of PeCa and its impact on oncological outcomes. A systematic review was conducted with reference to the PRISMA statement. Studies published from 2009 to 2024 were identified through a search conducted between 1975 and 2024. The search yielded 7 studies involving 574 patients. Intraoperative FSE had a high percentage of accuracy, with a mean accuracy of 95.4% and a range of 92.9–99.4%. The mean values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 71.4%, 99.9%, 98.8%, and 96.5%, respectively. Functional outcomes with PPS were encouraging, especially in terms of sexual function. The average local recurrence rate was 7.9%. There is a paucity of data on PeCa FSE in the literature. However, it appears that FSE is accurate and can be helpful in guiding surgeons intraoperatively when performing PPS.","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":"37 9","pages":"721-727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-025-01024-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-025-01024-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare but aggressive and life changing. Penile-preserving surgery (PPS) allows length preservation for sexual activity and normal voiding. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) of resection margins helps to decide on how much penile tissue is excised. Oncological outcomes and diagnostic accuracy of FSE to date, however, are not well documented. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of FSE in the treatment of PeCa and its impact on oncological outcomes. A systematic review was conducted with reference to the PRISMA statement. Studies published from 2009 to 2024 were identified through a search conducted between 1975 and 2024. The search yielded 7 studies involving 574 patients. Intraoperative FSE had a high percentage of accuracy, with a mean accuracy of 95.4% and a range of 92.9–99.4%. The mean values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 71.4%, 99.9%, 98.8%, and 96.5%, respectively. Functional outcomes with PPS were encouraging, especially in terms of sexual function. The average local recurrence rate was 7.9%. There is a paucity of data on PeCa FSE in the literature. However, it appears that FSE is accurate and can be helpful in guiding surgeons intraoperatively when performing PPS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴茎癌手术术中冰冻切片检查的系统回顾。
阴茎癌(PeCa)是一种罕见但具有侵袭性和改变生活的疾病。阴茎保留手术(PPS)允许长度保存的性活动和正常排尿。术中切除缘冰冻切片检查(FSE)有助于确定切除了多少阴茎组织。然而,迄今为止,FSE的肿瘤预后和诊断准确性并没有很好的文献记载。本系统综述的目的是评估FSE治疗PeCa的疗效及其对肿瘤预后的影响。参照PRISMA声明进行了系统审查。发表于2009年至2024年的研究是通过1975年至2024年之间的搜索确定的。这项搜索产生了7项研究,涉及574名患者。术中FSE准确率较高,平均准确率为95.4%,范围为92.9-99.4%。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值的平均值分别为71.4%、99.9%、98.8%和96.5%。PPS的功能结果令人鼓舞,尤其是性功能方面。平均局部复发率为7.9%。文献中缺乏关于PeCa FSE的数据。然而,FSE似乎是准确的,可以帮助指导外科医生术中进行PPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Response to comment on: Pre-spermatorrhea state: a novel therapeutic paradigm for the management of non-organic delayed ejaculation and anejaculation. Novel application of drug-coated balloon in external urethral meatus stricture: urinary and sexual outcomes. Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study. Advanced reconstructive genital surgery: current concepts and emerging directions. Comment on: Zero infection protocol in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a prospective cohort study using chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation and fibrin sealant hemostasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1