Retrospective Observational Descriptive Study on Use and Rotations to Belbuca®.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/15360288.2025.2462602
Mia Barbieri, Neil K Shah, Julia Iskra, Nicholas Field, Stephen Gruver
{"title":"Retrospective Observational Descriptive Study on Use and Rotations to Belbuca<sup>®</sup>.","authors":"Mia Barbieri, Neil K Shah, Julia Iskra, Nicholas Field, Stephen Gruver","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2462602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to better characterize morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) equivalencies with buccal buprenorphine, and identify real-world efficacy and safety outcomes associated with the use of buccal buprenorphine for chronic pain at a local VA Medical Center. This study was a retrospective chart review of Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) patient records with outpatient prescriptions for buccal buprenorphine (Belbuca<sup>®</sup>). Overall, there was a high discontinuation rate of Belbuca<sup>®</sup>: being 60% or greater across all different patient groups. These high attrition rates may potentially be result of failure to titrate to an optimal dose of Belbuca<sup>®</sup> needed for adequate analgesia. Those fully rotated fared marginally better than those partially rotated in that those fully rotated discontinued at a lesser rate and less quickly than those who were partially rotated. From the results of this study, a local dosing scheme for Belbuca<sup>®</sup> based on baseline MEDD was created for facility level guidance. The exact MEDD conversion ratio, however, for individual buprenorphine products as well as MEDD contributed by these products on a patient's overall opioid related risk compared to other full agonist opioids still remains unclear and further studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"304-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2462602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to better characterize morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) equivalencies with buccal buprenorphine, and identify real-world efficacy and safety outcomes associated with the use of buccal buprenorphine for chronic pain at a local VA Medical Center. This study was a retrospective chart review of Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) patient records with outpatient prescriptions for buccal buprenorphine (Belbuca®). Overall, there was a high discontinuation rate of Belbuca®: being 60% or greater across all different patient groups. These high attrition rates may potentially be result of failure to titrate to an optimal dose of Belbuca® needed for adequate analgesia. Those fully rotated fared marginally better than those partially rotated in that those fully rotated discontinued at a lesser rate and less quickly than those who were partially rotated. From the results of this study, a local dosing scheme for Belbuca® based on baseline MEDD was created for facility level guidance. The exact MEDD conversion ratio, however, for individual buprenorphine products as well as MEDD contributed by these products on a patient's overall opioid related risk compared to other full agonist opioids still remains unclear and further studies are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用和旋转Belbuca®的回顾性观察性描述性研究。
本研究的目的是更好地表征吗啡当量日剂量(MEDD)与口腔丁丙诺啡的等效性,并确定在当地VA医疗中心使用口腔丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛的实际疗效和安全性结果。本研究是对计算机患者记录系统(CPRS)门诊处方颊用丁丙诺啡(Belbuca®)的患者记录进行回顾性图表回顾。总的来说,Belbuca®的停药率很高:在所有不同的患者组中为60%或更高。这些高损耗率可能是由于未能滴定到充分镇痛所需的最佳剂量Belbuca®。完全旋转的患者比部分旋转的患者表现稍好,因为完全旋转的患者比部分旋转的患者停药的速度和速度要慢。根据本研究的结果,建立了基于基线MEDD的Belbuca®局部给药方案,用于设施级指导。然而,与其他完全激动剂阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡单个产品的确切MEDD转化率以及这些产品对患者整体阿片类药物相关风险的MEDD贡献仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Anesthetic Management in Cancer Patients Receiving Strong Opioids: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center with Palliative Care Team Involvement. Impact of Pharmacist-Led Risk Mitigation Strategies for Veterans Prescribed Concurrent Benzodiazepine and Opioid Medications with or Without a Stimulant. Low-Dose Ketamine Infusions for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients on Chronic Opioids Therapy in General Inpatient Units: safety Signals and Monitoring Needs in a Retrospective Cohort. Clinical Pharmacist-Led Low-Dose Buprenorphine Initiations (Microinductions): A Case Series. The Clinical Application of Suzetrigine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1