Lessons of screening two million newborns for congenital adrenal hyperplasia: 10-year experience of the Minas Gerais Public Health Program.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.012
Cristina Botelho Barra, Gabrielly Souza Sena, Helena Pereira Oliveira, Ana Luiza Ataíde Carneiro de Paula Gonzaga, Raquel Ferreira Araújo, Thais Ramos Villela, Rafael Machado Mantovani, José Nélio Januário, Ivani Novato Silva
{"title":"Lessons of screening two million newborns for congenital adrenal hyperplasia: 10-year experience of the Minas Gerais Public Health Program.","authors":"Cristina Botelho Barra, Gabrielly Souza Sena, Helena Pereira Oliveira, Ana Luiza Ataíde Carneiro de Paula Gonzaga, Raquel Ferreira Araújo, Thais Ramos Villela, Rafael Machado Mantovani, José Nélio Januário, Ivani Novato Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is a 10-year period, descriptive and retrospective evaluation of a Brazilian State NBS-CAH public program, bringing light to the prior discussion concerning its implementation, by sharing the screening-240,000 babies annually practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Minas Gerais (MG) NBS program has been coordinated by NUPAD, a neonatal screening, monitoring care, and genetics center at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), intermediating all necessary actions, under the management of the State Health Administration, and following the Brazilian universal program. The dataset was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), incidence, number of carriers, and false-positive rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 2,094,588 newborns were screened, and the incidence was 1:14,152; PPV was 10.8 %. Most samples were collected on the fifth day after birth (interquartile range 4-6 days); 1352 babies were referred for clinical evaluation; 1210 were false positives (0.06 %), and 142 presented the classic form; 22 % of newborns were hospitalized due to salt-loss symptoms before or at the first visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MG NBS-CAH success as a public program comes from the Brazilian unified public health system, with integrated care, and from the newborn screening center offering timely referred screened positive cases and its outstanding state coverage. Appropriate cutoffs and close monitoring of hospitalized newborns have been pivotal for reducing the high false-positive rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This is a 10-year period, descriptive and retrospective evaluation of a Brazilian State NBS-CAH public program, bringing light to the prior discussion concerning its implementation, by sharing the screening-240,000 babies annually practices.

Methods: The Minas Gerais (MG) NBS program has been coordinated by NUPAD, a neonatal screening, monitoring care, and genetics center at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), intermediating all necessary actions, under the management of the State Health Administration, and following the Brazilian universal program. The dataset was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), incidence, number of carriers, and false-positive rates.

Results: About 2,094,588 newborns were screened, and the incidence was 1:14,152; PPV was 10.8 %. Most samples were collected on the fifth day after birth (interquartile range 4-6 days); 1352 babies were referred for clinical evaluation; 1210 were false positives (0.06 %), and 142 presented the classic form; 22 % of newborns were hospitalized due to salt-loss symptoms before or at the first visit.

Conclusions: The MG NBS-CAH success as a public program comes from the Brazilian unified public health system, with integrated care, and from the newborn screening center offering timely referred screened positive cases and its outstanding state coverage. Appropriate cutoffs and close monitoring of hospitalized newborns have been pivotal for reducing the high false-positive rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Geographic pattern of asthma prevalence in Brazilian adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Development of a YouthFit Index to assess health-related quality of life in Hong Kong children. Lessons of screening two million newborns for congenital adrenal hyperplasia: 10-year experience of the Minas Gerais Public Health Program. Risk factors for colonization/infection by resistant microorganisms in outbreaks in neonatal unit-a systematic review and meta-analysis. A study on neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with congenital hypothyroidism highlights the importance of periodic developmental assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1