The association between cannabis and depression: an updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724003143
Victoria Churchill, Caroline Sutton Chubb, Lucy Popova, Claire A Spears, Terri Pigott
{"title":"The association between cannabis and depression: an updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Victoria Churchill, Caroline Sutton Chubb, Lucy Popova, Claire A Spears, Terri Pigott","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis is one of the most commonly used drugs globally, although its legal status varies across regions. Public support for its decriminalization has increased, but gaps in our understanding of the health consequences of cannabis use remain, particularly related to its impact on mental health. This article provides an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (previous being Lev-Ran et al., ) looking at the relationship between cannabis and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature available before March 2023 was screened for longitudinal studies that included cannabis use and depression. Cross-sectional studies and those only looking at special populations were excluded. Studies must have also controlled for depression at baseline to allow for investigation of a temporal relationship. Extracted data included cannabis measures, depression outcomes, adjusted odds ratios, and study settings. Meta-analysis employed a random effects model with multilevel meta-regression for effect size moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1,599 titles from various databases, resulting in 22 studies for meta-analysis, including 14 from Lev-Ran et al. Eleven studies were US-based, with participants mostly under 18. Meta-analysis showed a higher risk of depression among cannabis users (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.13-1.46). Risk of bias assessment showed medium risk across studies with exposure measurement being a key bias area. The funnel plot and Egger's Sandwich test did not suggest publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the association between cannabis use and depression but also emphasizes the need for further research, especially in understanding usage patterns, heavy use definitions, and long-term effects on depression risk amidst changing cannabis trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis is one of the most commonly used drugs globally, although its legal status varies across regions. Public support for its decriminalization has increased, but gaps in our understanding of the health consequences of cannabis use remain, particularly related to its impact on mental health. This article provides an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (previous being Lev-Ran et al., ) looking at the relationship between cannabis and depression.

Methods: Literature available before March 2023 was screened for longitudinal studies that included cannabis use and depression. Cross-sectional studies and those only looking at special populations were excluded. Studies must have also controlled for depression at baseline to allow for investigation of a temporal relationship. Extracted data included cannabis measures, depression outcomes, adjusted odds ratios, and study settings. Meta-analysis employed a random effects model with multilevel meta-regression for effect size moderators.

Results: The search yielded 1,599 titles from various databases, resulting in 22 studies for meta-analysis, including 14 from Lev-Ran et al. Eleven studies were US-based, with participants mostly under 18. Meta-analysis showed a higher risk of depression among cannabis users (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.13-1.46). Risk of bias assessment showed medium risk across studies with exposure measurement being a key bias area. The funnel plot and Egger's Sandwich test did not suggest publication bias.

Conclusions: This study underscores the association between cannabis use and depression but also emphasizes the need for further research, especially in understanding usage patterns, heavy use definitions, and long-term effects on depression risk amidst changing cannabis trends.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻与抑郁症之间的关系:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:大麻是全球最常用的毒品之一,尽管其法律地位因区域而异。公众对大麻非刑事化的支持有所增加,但我们对大麻使用的健康后果的理解仍然存在差距,特别是对其对心理健康的影响。这篇文章提供了一个更新的系统综述和荟萃分析(之前是Lev-Ran等人),研究大麻和抑郁症之间的关系。方法:筛选2023年3月之前的文献,包括大麻使用和抑郁症的纵向研究。横断面研究和那些只关注特殊人群的研究被排除在外。研究还必须在基线上控制抑郁,以便对时间关系进行调查。提取的数据包括大麻测量、抑郁结果、调整后的优势比和研究设置。meta分析采用随机效应模型,对效应大小调节因子进行多水平meta回归。结果:从不同的数据库中检索到1599篇论文,得到22篇研究进行meta分析,其中14篇来自Lev-Ran等人。11项研究在美国进行,参与者大多在18岁以下。荟萃分析显示,大麻使用者患抑郁症的风险更高(OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.13-1.46)。偏倚风险评估显示,暴露测量是一个关键偏倚区域,所有研究的偏倚风险为中等。漏斗图和Egger's Sandwich检验未提示发表偏倚。结论:本研究强调了大麻使用与抑郁症之间的联系,但也强调了进一步研究的必要性,特别是在了解大麻使用模式、重度使用定义以及大麻趋势变化对抑郁症风险的长期影响方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Letter about '"Here today, gone tomorrow" - What happened to recurrent brief depression?" Meta-analysis of neural correlates of working memory, reward, and emotion processing in major depressive disorder using ALE. The effect of adult psychological therapies on employment and earnings: Evidence from England. Evidence for a diagnostic distinction between functional seizures and functional motor symptoms from the TriNetX electronic health record database. Maternal depression with and without a history of childhood maltreatment and newborn white matter microstructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1