Criteria for home treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (the Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis EARTH - rule): an international Delphi consensus study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2025.01.016
Mathieu Servent , Scott D. Casey , William B. Stubblefield , Delphine Douillet , Federico Germini , Andrea Penaloza , Christopher Kabrhel , Menno V. Huisman , David R. Vinson , Pierre-Marie Roy , Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (EARTH)
{"title":"Criteria for home treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (the Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis EARTH - rule): an international Delphi consensus study","authors":"Mathieu Servent ,&nbsp;Scott D. Casey ,&nbsp;William B. Stubblefield ,&nbsp;Delphine Douillet ,&nbsp;Federico Germini ,&nbsp;Andrea Penaloza ,&nbsp;Christopher Kabrhel ,&nbsp;Menno V. Huisman ,&nbsp;David R. Vinson ,&nbsp;Pierre-Marie Roy ,&nbsp;Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (EARTH)","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The safety of home treatment for patients with low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been confirmed in several studies; however, these studies have used varying triaging criteria and outcomes, leading to inconsistencies in defining safe discharge parameters. This study aimed to identify adverse outcomes that make home discharge inappropriate, as well as their timeframe and clinical criteria, indicating high risk for such events.</div><div>Following a systematic literature review, an international expert panel participated in 3 Delphi survey rounds. Experts evaluated each proposal using a Likert scale, and consensus required 75% agreement. Items without consensus were reassessed in subsequent rounds until agreement was achieved.</div><div>Of the 55 invited experts, 38 from 13 countries participated (69%). Consensus was reached on 6 adverse events for a composite outcome, with a 7-day postdischarge timeframe and a maximum acceptable incidence of 2.0%. The panel defined a triaging rule with 14 clinical criteria as contraindications for home treatment, grouped into 4 categories: hemodynamic (3), respiratory (1), hemorrhagic (7), and medico-social (3). An extended rule, adding 3 optional biological or imaging criteria, was developed to further refine risk assessment.</div><div>The expert panel established a consensus-based triaging rule for the home treatment of PE patients. This framework defines adverse outcomes, a 7-day safety timeframe, and an acceptable risk threshold for assessing patient safety. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis rule before its implementation in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages 1758-1766"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783625000595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The safety of home treatment for patients with low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been confirmed in several studies; however, these studies have used varying triaging criteria and outcomes, leading to inconsistencies in defining safe discharge parameters. This study aimed to identify adverse outcomes that make home discharge inappropriate, as well as their timeframe and clinical criteria, indicating high risk for such events.
Following a systematic literature review, an international expert panel participated in 3 Delphi survey rounds. Experts evaluated each proposal using a Likert scale, and consensus required 75% agreement. Items without consensus were reassessed in subsequent rounds until agreement was achieved.
Of the 55 invited experts, 38 from 13 countries participated (69%). Consensus was reached on 6 adverse events for a composite outcome, with a 7-day postdischarge timeframe and a maximum acceptable incidence of 2.0%. The panel defined a triaging rule with 14 clinical criteria as contraindications for home treatment, grouped into 4 categories: hemodynamic (3), respiratory (1), hemorrhagic (7), and medico-social (3). An extended rule, adding 3 optional biological or imaging criteria, was developed to further refine risk assessment.
The expert panel established a consensus-based triaging rule for the home treatment of PE patients. This framework defines adverse outcomes, a 7-day safety timeframe, and an acceptable risk threshold for assessing patient safety. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the Emergency Advisory and Research international board on Thrombosis and Hemostasis rule before its implementation in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肺栓塞患者家庭治疗标准(EARTH规则):一项国际德尔菲共识研究。
一些研究已经证实了家庭治疗低风险急性肺栓塞(PE)患者的安全性;然而,这些研究使用了不同的分类标准和结果,导致安全出院参数的定义不一致。本研究旨在确定使家庭出院不合适的不良后果,其时间框架和表明此类事件高风险的临床标准。在系统的文献回顾之后,一个国际专家小组参加了三轮德尔菲调查。专家们使用李克特量表评估每个提案,达成共识需要75%的同意。没有协商一致意见的项目在随后几轮中重新评估,直到达成协议为止。在55位受邀专家中,来自13个国家的38位参加了会议(69%)。在出院后7天的时间框架内,对6个不良事件达成了共识,最大可接受发生率为2.0%。该小组定义了一个包含14个临床标准的分类规则,作为家庭治疗的禁忌症,分为四类:血流动力学(3)、呼吸(1)、出血(7)和医学社会(3)。一个扩展规则,增加了三个可选的生物学或影像学标准,进一步完善了风险评估。专家小组为PE患者的家庭治疗建立了基于共识的分诊规则。该框架定义了不良后果、7天的安全时间框架和评估患者安全性的可接受风险阈值。在临床实践中实施EARTH规则之前,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
期刊最新文献
Formation of a ternary polyphosphate-thrombin-fibrin complex attenuates thrombin activity. A chemiluminescent microfluidic thrombin generation assay for real-time monitoring in patient plasma. Genetics of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP): Systematic Review in Immune and Congenital TTP. Associations of tumour somatic mutations with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Fibrinolysis versus Urgent Surgery in Obstructive Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis: Updated Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1