Yunhui Tang, Cuifeng Qian, Man Li, Min Zhao, Qi Chen
{"title":"Are the Risk Factors for Developing Type 1 and Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Different?","authors":"Yunhui Tang, Cuifeng Qian, Man Li, Min Zhao, Qi Chen","doi":"10.1002/jum.16662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy. Early termination of pregnancy is recommended because of the potential risks of uterine rupture if the pregnancy continues. CSP is clinically divided into type 1 and type 2, based on the site of embryo implantation and grow direction of the gestational sac. The clinical risk and treatment options may vary between these subtypes. Identifying the differences and potential factors impacting the development of each type could contribute to improved clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 143 women with type 1 CSP and 200 women with type 2 CSP women, diagnosed between January 2020 and July 2023. The primary objective was to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics between the 2 CSP subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass index, the number of previous CSPs, elective abortions, gravidity, and parity were not significantly different between the 2 subtypes. Similarly, the interval between the last cesarean section and the current CSP was not associated with developing the 2 subtypes. However, women with more than 3 prior cesarean sections had an increased risk of developing type 1 CSP. In contrast, vaginal bleeding before diagnosis was more frequently associated with type 2 CSP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study with a large sample size found that despite type 2 CSP involving deeper myometrial invasion, the 2 subtypes share many clinical characteristics. Moreover, the clinical risk factors for distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 CSP are limited. Future research to identify predictors for CSP classification is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy. Early termination of pregnancy is recommended because of the potential risks of uterine rupture if the pregnancy continues. CSP is clinically divided into type 1 and type 2, based on the site of embryo implantation and grow direction of the gestational sac. The clinical risk and treatment options may vary between these subtypes. Identifying the differences and potential factors impacting the development of each type could contribute to improved clinical management.
Methods: This retrospective study included 143 women with type 1 CSP and 200 women with type 2 CSP women, diagnosed between January 2020 and July 2023. The primary objective was to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics between the 2 CSP subtypes.
Results: Body mass index, the number of previous CSPs, elective abortions, gravidity, and parity were not significantly different between the 2 subtypes. Similarly, the interval between the last cesarean section and the current CSP was not associated with developing the 2 subtypes. However, women with more than 3 prior cesarean sections had an increased risk of developing type 1 CSP. In contrast, vaginal bleeding before diagnosis was more frequently associated with type 2 CSP.
Conclusions: Our study with a large sample size found that despite type 2 CSP involving deeper myometrial invasion, the 2 subtypes share many clinical characteristics. Moreover, the clinical risk factors for distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 CSP are limited. Future research to identify predictors for CSP classification is required.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound