Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70057
Violeta Moizé, Yitka Graham, Ximena Ramos Salas, Mercè Balcells
{"title":"Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Violeta Moizé, Yitka Graham, Ximena Ramos Salas, Mercè Balcells","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients perceive high levels of weight prejudice, stigma, and discrimination within health systems, affecting their ability to manage their obesity and related chronic conditions. Scientific and patient obesity associations worldwide have prioritized the reduction of weight stigma to improve patient experiences in health systems and overall health outcomes. Since a significant proportion of the population is now living with multiple chronic diseases related to obesity, healthcare systems must shift toward multi-disease management frameworks incorporating person-centered and non-stigmatizing clinical conversations. Motivational Interviewing (MI) has the potential to transform clinical interactions by using non-stigmatizing language, communication, and practices. Studies using MI in obesity management have solely focused on weight loss outcomes, while other patient experience related outcomes would also be relevant to evaluate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was undertaken to critically analyze the potential impact of MI on obesity and chronic disease management practices and experiences.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>An analysis and contextualization of the MI theoretical framework for obesity management, based on the philosophy of motivational spirit, was reviewed, assessing micro skills or strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MI may assist healthcare professionals conduct non-stigmatizing clinical conversations in accordance with basic principles of collaborative therapeutic alliances. A proposal for research considerations that can help illuminate the potential for of MI in obesity management is also outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients perceive high levels of weight prejudice, stigma, and discrimination within health systems, affecting their ability to manage their obesity and related chronic conditions. Scientific and patient obesity associations worldwide have prioritized the reduction of weight stigma to improve patient experiences in health systems and overall health outcomes. Since a significant proportion of the population is now living with multiple chronic diseases related to obesity, healthcare systems must shift toward multi-disease management frameworks incorporating person-centered and non-stigmatizing clinical conversations. Motivational Interviewing (MI) has the potential to transform clinical interactions by using non-stigmatizing language, communication, and practices. Studies using MI in obesity management have solely focused on weight loss outcomes, while other patient experience related outcomes would also be relevant to evaluate.

Methods: A narrative review was undertaken to critically analyze the potential impact of MI on obesity and chronic disease management practices and experiences.

Findings: An analysis and contextualization of the MI theoretical framework for obesity management, based on the philosophy of motivational spirit, was reviewed, assessing micro skills or strategies.

Conclusion: MI may assist healthcare professionals conduct non-stigmatizing clinical conversations in accordance with basic principles of collaborative therapeutic alliances. A proposal for research considerations that can help illuminate the potential for of MI in obesity management is also outlined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动机访谈(MI)在肥胖护理:培养以人为中心和支持性临床对话,以减少耻辱:叙述性回顾。
背景:患者认为卫生系统内存在高度的体重偏见、污名和歧视,影响了他们管理肥胖和相关慢性疾病的能力。世界各地的科学和患者肥胖协会已将减轻体重耻辱感作为优先事项,以改善患者在卫生系统中的体验和总体健康结果。由于很大一部分人口现在患有与肥胖相关的多种慢性疾病,医疗保健系统必须转向多疾病管理框架,包括以人为本和非污名化的临床对话。动机访谈(MI)通过使用非污名化的语言、沟通和实践,有可能改变临床互动。在肥胖管理中使用心肌梗死的研究仅关注减肥结果,而其他患者经历相关的结果也将与评估相关。方法:回顾性分析心肌梗死对肥胖和慢性疾病管理实践和经验的潜在影响。研究结果:回顾了基于激励精神哲学的MI肥胖管理理论框架的分析和背景化,评估了微观技能或策略。结论:心梗可以帮助医护人员按照合作治疗联盟的基本原则进行非污名化的临床对话。本文还提出了一项研究建议,以帮助阐明心肌梗死在肥胖管理中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Negative Consequences of Removing GLP-1 RA Obesity Coverage: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Comparison Study. Prevalence of Therapeutic Inertia in the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Patients With a Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Followed up by Primary Care Physicians. Proximal and Distal Factors Associated With Obesity in Childhood: An Exploratory Structural Equation Model. Aligning Biomedical Research With Neurodiversity to Support the Metabolic Health of Autistic Individuals. Development of the Weight and Emotions Scale (WES).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1