Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Visual Field in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Under Moderate and Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07738-3
Marcelo Nogueira Cruz da Silva, Ed Carlos Rey Moura, Caio Marcio Barros Oliveira, João Nogueira Neto, Roclides Castro de Lima, Almir Vieira Dibai Filho, José Aparecido Valadão, Hiago Parreão Braga, Plínio da Cunha Leal
{"title":"Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Visual Field in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Under Moderate and Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Marcelo Nogueira Cruz da Silva, Ed Carlos Rey Moura, Caio Marcio Barros Oliveira, João Nogueira Neto, Roclides Castro de Lima, Almir Vieira Dibai Filho, José Aparecido Valadão, Hiago Parreão Braga, Plínio da Cunha Leal","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07738-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sustained administration of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions compared to moderate NMB and might be effective in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sustained intravenous deep NMB on improving surgical conditions and pain intensity following LRYGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil, between October 2021 and December 2023. Patients undergoing LRYGB were randomly assigned to moderate (reversed with 2 mg/kg of sugammadex) or deep NMB (reversed with 4 mg/kg of sugammadex).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients were evaluated in the study, divided into moderate NMB with 37 patients and deep NMB group with 34 patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding gender, age, weight, height, and comorbidities. Also, in the duration of anesthesia (moderate, 2 h 26 min; deep, 2 h 27 min; p = 0.876), duration of surgery (moderate, 1 h 39 min; deep NMB: 1 h 40 min; p = 0.931), time to extubation (moderate, 5 min; deep, 7 min; p = 0.252), time to the first morphine request (moderate, 30 min; deep, 25 min on average; p = 0.776), mean morphine consumption in 24 h (moderate, 14 mg; deep, 10 mg; p = 0.133), and sevoflurane consumption (moderate, 50 mL; deep 50 mL; p = 0.884). There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores at none of the evaluated moments. The Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale revealed a significant difference between the groups at 20/30 min (p = 0.015) and 60/70 min (p = 0.027), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated improved surgical field visibility with deep compared to moderate NMB, without significant differences in other evaluated variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1045-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07738-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The sustained administration of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions compared to moderate NMB and might be effective in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sustained intravenous deep NMB on improving surgical conditions and pain intensity following LRYGB.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil, between October 2021 and December 2023. Patients undergoing LRYGB were randomly assigned to moderate (reversed with 2 mg/kg of sugammadex) or deep NMB (reversed with 4 mg/kg of sugammadex).

Results: Seventy-one patients were evaluated in the study, divided into moderate NMB with 37 patients and deep NMB group with 34 patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding gender, age, weight, height, and comorbidities. Also, in the duration of anesthesia (moderate, 2 h 26 min; deep, 2 h 27 min; p = 0.876), duration of surgery (moderate, 1 h 39 min; deep NMB: 1 h 40 min; p = 0.931), time to extubation (moderate, 5 min; deep, 7 min; p = 0.252), time to the first morphine request (moderate, 30 min; deep, 25 min on average; p = 0.776), mean morphine consumption in 24 h (moderate, 14 mg; deep, 10 mg; p = 0.133), and sevoflurane consumption (moderate, 50 mL; deep 50 mL; p = 0.884). There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores at none of the evaluated moments. The Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale revealed a significant difference between the groups at 20/30 min (p = 0.015) and 60/70 min (p = 0.027), respectively.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated improved surgical field visibility with deep compared to moderate NMB, without significant differences in other evaluated variables.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估中度和深度神经肌肉阻断下腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术患者术后疼痛和视野:随机临床试验。
背景:与中度神经肌肉阻滞相比,持续给予深部神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)可改善手术条件,并可能在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)中有效。本研究旨在评估持续静脉深部NMB对改善LRYGB术后手术条件和疼痛强度的影响。方法:该随机双盲临床试验于2021年10月至2023年12月在巴西maranh的s o Luís进行。接受LRYGB的患者被随机分配到中度(用2 mg/kg的糖madex逆转)或深度NMB(用4 mg/kg的糖madex逆转)。结果:71例患者纳入研究,分为中度NMB组37例,深度NMB组34例。两组在性别、年龄、体重、身高和合并症方面没有差异。此外,麻醉时间(中度,2小时26分钟;深度,2小时27分钟;P = 0.876)、手术时间(中等,1 h 39 min;深度NMB: 1 h 40 min;P = 0.931),拔管时间(中等,5 min;深度,7分钟;P = 0.252),到第一次吗啡请求的时间(中度,30 min;深度,平均25分钟;P = 0.776),平均24 h吗啡用量(中度,14 mg;深,10毫克;p = 0.133),七氟醚用量(适量,50 mL;深50毫升;p = 0.884)。在所有评估时刻,两组之间的疼痛评分均无显著差异。leden - surgical Rating Scale在20/30 min (p = 0.015)和60/70 min (p = 0.027)两组间差异有统计学意义。结论:该研究表明,与中度NMB相比,深度NMB可提高手术视野可见度,其他评估变量无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Post-operative Metabolic Adaptation and its Influence on Long-Term Recurrent Weight Gain After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review. Correction to: Sex Differences in the Impact of Preoperative Psychological Factors on Weight Loss Following Sleeve Gastrectomy. Loop versus Roux-en-Y Duodenojejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Type 2 Diabetes: Three-Year Outcomes of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Energy and Micronutrient Intake One Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Substudy of the Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1