Neural subgroups in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder during emotion regulation.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724003593
Hanne Lie Kjærstad, Florien Ritsma, Klara Coello, Sharleny Stanislaus, Klaus Munkholm, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Julian Macoveanu, Anne Juul Bjertrup, Maj Vinberg, Lars Vedel Kessing, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak
{"title":"Neural subgroups in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder during emotion regulation.","authors":"Hanne Lie Kjærstad, Florien Ritsma, Klara Coello, Sharleny Stanislaus, Klaus Munkholm, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Julian Macoveanu, Anne Juul Bjertrup, Maj Vinberg, Lars Vedel Kessing, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired emotion regulation has been proposed as a putative endophenotype in bipolar disorder (BD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating this in unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) have thus far yielded incongruent findings. Hence, the current paper examines neural subgroups among UR during emotion regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>71 UR of patients with BD and 66 healthy controls (HC) underwent fMRI scanning while performing an emotion regulation task. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on extracted signal change during emotion down-regulation in pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs). Identified subgroups were compared on neural activation, demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two subgroups of UR were identified: subgroup 1 (39 UR; 55%) was characterized by <i>hypo</i>-activity in the dorsolateral, dorsomedial, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the bilateral amygdalae, but comparable activation to HC in the other ROIs; subgroup 2 (32 UR; 45%) was characterized by <i>hyperactivity</i> in all ROIs. Subgroup 1 had lower success in emotion regulation compared to HC and reported more childhood trauma compared to subgroup 2 and HC. Subgroup 2 reported more anxiety, lower functioning, and greater attentional vigilance toward fearful faces compared to HC. Relatives from both subgroups were poorer in recognizing positive faces compared to HC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings may explain the discrepancy in earlier fMRI studies on emotion regulation in UR, showing two different subgroups of UR that both exhibited aberrant neural activity during emotion regulation, but in opposite directions. Furthermore, the results suggest that impaired recognition of positive facial expressions is a broad endophenotype of BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e45"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impaired emotion regulation has been proposed as a putative endophenotype in bipolar disorder (BD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating this in unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) have thus far yielded incongruent findings. Hence, the current paper examines neural subgroups among UR during emotion regulation.

Methods: 71 UR of patients with BD and 66 healthy controls (HC) underwent fMRI scanning while performing an emotion regulation task. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on extracted signal change during emotion down-regulation in pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs). Identified subgroups were compared on neural activation, demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables.

Results: Two subgroups of UR were identified: subgroup 1 (39 UR; 55%) was characterized by hypo-activity in the dorsolateral, dorsomedial, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the bilateral amygdalae, but comparable activation to HC in the other ROIs; subgroup 2 (32 UR; 45%) was characterized by hyperactivity in all ROIs. Subgroup 1 had lower success in emotion regulation compared to HC and reported more childhood trauma compared to subgroup 2 and HC. Subgroup 2 reported more anxiety, lower functioning, and greater attentional vigilance toward fearful faces compared to HC. Relatives from both subgroups were poorer in recognizing positive faces compared to HC.

Conclusions: These findings may explain the discrepancy in earlier fMRI studies on emotion regulation in UR, showing two different subgroups of UR that both exhibited aberrant neural activity during emotion regulation, but in opposite directions. Furthermore, the results suggest that impaired recognition of positive facial expressions is a broad endophenotype of BD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相情感障碍患者未受影响的一级亲属在情绪调节中的神经亚群。
背景:情绪调节障碍被认为是双相情感障碍(BD)的一种可能的内表型。功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)研究在未受影响的一级亲属(UR)中调查这一点,迄今为止产生了不一致的结果。因此,本文研究了UR在情绪调节过程中的神经亚群。方法:71例BD患者和66例健康对照(HC)在执行情绪调节任务时进行fMRI扫描。对提取的情绪下调信号在预定义兴趣区域(roi)中的变化进行层次聚类分析。确定的亚组在神经激活、人口统计学、临床和认知变量上进行比较。结果:确定了2个UR亚组:亚组1(39个UR;55%)的特征是背外侧、背内侧、腹外侧前额皮质和双侧杏仁核活性低,但在其他roi中与HC相似;亚组2 (32 UR);45%),所有roi均表现为过动。与HC相比,亚组1在情绪调节方面的成功率较低,与亚组2和HC相比,报告了更多的童年创伤。与HC相比,亚组2报告了更多的焦虑,更低的功能,以及对恐惧面孔的更大的注意警惕性。与HC相比,两个亚组的亲属在识别积极面孔方面都较差。结论:这些发现可能解释了早期功能磁共振成像研究中关于UR情绪调节的差异,表明两个不同的UR亚组在情绪调节过程中都表现出异常的神经活动,但方向相反。此外,研究结果表明,对积极面部表情的识别受损是双相障碍的一种广泛的内表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Changes in cannabis potency and cannabis-related psychiatric harms: a 23-year ecological study in Denmark. Distinct and common subcortical functional connectivity revealed across three major psychiatric disorders. Linking brain structure to stress reactivity: cingulate surface area predicts acute cortisol responses - CORRIGENDUM. Modulating empathy with tDCS: dissociable roles of rTPJ and lDLPFC. The effects of rTMS over orbitofrontal cortex on cognitive functions in first-episode schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1