A prospective survey evaluating the visual quality of KARL STORZ fiberoptic, digital, and disposable flexible ureteroscopes.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05502-x
Clarissa Wong, Perry Xu, Nicholas Dean, Mark Assmus, Alyssa McDonald, Deepak Agarwal, Sohrab Ali, Garen Abedi, Ezra Margolin, Robert Medairos, Charles Nottingham, Amy Krambeck
{"title":"A prospective survey evaluating the visual quality of KARL STORZ fiberoptic, digital, and disposable flexible ureteroscopes.","authors":"Clarissa Wong, Perry Xu, Nicholas Dean, Mark Assmus, Alyssa McDonald, Deepak Agarwal, Sohrab Ali, Garen Abedi, Ezra Margolin, Robert Medairos, Charles Nottingham, Amy Krambeck","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05502-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the visual quality amongst the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S flexible ureteroscopes (FUS) and determine whether urologists can distinguish which FUS is in use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective survey, 6 patients were prospectively randomized to the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S FUS for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for nephrolithiasis. Each RIRS was performed by a single-surgeon and recorded. 9 fellowship-trained endourologists were blinded to which FUS was used. They were asked to view the recordings, answer which FUS was used, and fill out a 7-question survey grading parameters from 0 to 5. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc analysis confirmed significance defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78%, 89%, and 78% of endourologists correctly identified which FUS was used between the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S FUS's respectively. The digital FUS outperformed the others in overall score (p < 0.001). The only visual parameter that was not statistically different amongst FUS's was Laser Activation Interference (p = 0.97). After Tukey's posthoc analysis, the digital FUS outperformed the fiberoptic scope in all parameters except LAI. The disposable FUS outperformed the fiberoptic scope in all parameters except for LAI, tissue interference (TI), and overall impression. The digital FUS was superior to the disposable FUS only in Visual quality (Color) and TI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of fellowship-trained endourologists can distinguish which type of KARL STORZ FUS is in use. The KARL STORZ digital and disposable FUS's outperform the KARL STORZ fiberoptic FUS in nearly all visual parameters. The KARL STORZ disposable FUS is comparable to the KARL STORZ digital FUS except for Visual Quality (Color) and Tissue Interference.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Northwestern Institutional Review Board and was assigned study ID STU00217933. It is also registered under NCT05646069, titled \"Evaluation of Novel Disposable Flexible Ureteroscope for the Treatment of Renal Calculi.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05502-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual quality amongst the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S flexible ureteroscopes (FUS) and determine whether urologists can distinguish which FUS is in use.

Methods: In this prospective survey, 6 patients were prospectively randomized to the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S FUS for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for nephrolithiasis. Each RIRS was performed by a single-surgeon and recorded. 9 fellowship-trained endourologists were blinded to which FUS was used. They were asked to view the recordings, answer which FUS was used, and fill out a 7-question survey grading parameters from 0 to 5. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc analysis confirmed significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results: 78%, 89%, and 78% of endourologists correctly identified which FUS was used between the disposable FLEX-XC1, digital FLEX-XC, and fiberoptic FLEX-X2S FUS's respectively. The digital FUS outperformed the others in overall score (p < 0.001). The only visual parameter that was not statistically different amongst FUS's was Laser Activation Interference (p = 0.97). After Tukey's posthoc analysis, the digital FUS outperformed the fiberoptic scope in all parameters except LAI. The disposable FUS outperformed the fiberoptic scope in all parameters except for LAI, tissue interference (TI), and overall impression. The digital FUS was superior to the disposable FUS only in Visual quality (Color) and TI.

Conclusions: The majority of fellowship-trained endourologists can distinguish which type of KARL STORZ FUS is in use. The KARL STORZ digital and disposable FUS's outperform the KARL STORZ fiberoptic FUS in nearly all visual parameters. The KARL STORZ disposable FUS is comparable to the KARL STORZ digital FUS except for Visual Quality (Color) and Tissue Interference.

Clinical trial registration: This study was approved by the Northwestern Institutional Review Board and was assigned study ID STU00217933. It is also registered under NCT05646069, titled "Evaluation of Novel Disposable Flexible Ureteroscope for the Treatment of Renal Calculi."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic disparities in survival of patients with non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma. A prospective survey evaluating the visual quality of KARL STORZ fiberoptic, digital, and disposable flexible ureteroscopes. Pulsed Thulium: YAG laser for the management of Urolothiasis: a systematic review from the EAU section of endourology. Which current chatbot is more competent in urological theoretical knowledge? A comparative analysis by the European board of urology in-service assessment. Transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for recalcitrant bladder neck contracture after holmium laser enucleation of prostate: initial experience and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1