Meta-analysis of EGFR gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.

Meryem Fakhkhari, Ikram Salih, Khaoula Errafii, Salsabil Hamdi, Khalid Sadki
{"title":"Meta-analysis of <i>EGFR</i> gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.","authors":"Meryem Fakhkhari, Ikram Salih, Khaoula Errafii, Salsabil Hamdi, Khalid Sadki","doi":"10.1177/03946320251316731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the associations of four specific Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)-rs712829, rs712830, rs11568315, and rs884225-located in the promoter, intronic, and 3' untranslated regions (3'UTR) of the EGFR gene, with lung cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The associations between EGFR gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk is a topic of ongoing debate, which is still deemed controversial. Despite numerous studies, results are inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search across the PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant case-control studies examining the association between EGFR gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 26,959 articles, 10 case-control studies were included, involving 2471 lung cancer patients and 4489 controls. A significant association between rs712829 and increased lung cancer risk was found across multiple genetic models. Under the allelic contrast model (G vs T), the OR was 1.31 (95% CI = [1.02; 1.68], <i>p</i> < 0.05), the dominant model (GG + GT vs TT) showed an OR of 1.69 (95% CI = [1.07; 2.67], <i>p</i> < 0.05), the homozygote model (GG vs TT) yielded an OR of 1.70 (95% CI = [1.00; 2.88], <i>p</i> < 0.05), and the heterozygote model (GT vs TT) had an OR of 1.64 (95% CI = [1.01; 2.66], <i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant associations were found for rs11568315, rs712830, and rs884225.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from the current meta-analysis confirm that rs712829 within the EGFR gene is significantly associated with lung cancer risk according to the allele, dominant, homozygote and heterozygote models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48647,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology","volume":"39 ","pages":"3946320251316731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03946320251316731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the associations of four specific Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)-rs712829, rs712830, rs11568315, and rs884225-located in the promoter, intronic, and 3' untranslated regions (3'UTR) of the EGFR gene, with lung cancer risk.

Introduction: The associations between EGFR gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk is a topic of ongoing debate, which is still deemed controversial. Despite numerous studies, results are inconsistent.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across the PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant case-control studies examining the association between EGFR gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.

Results: From an initial pool of 26,959 articles, 10 case-control studies were included, involving 2471 lung cancer patients and 4489 controls. A significant association between rs712829 and increased lung cancer risk was found across multiple genetic models. Under the allelic contrast model (G vs T), the OR was 1.31 (95% CI = [1.02; 1.68], p < 0.05), the dominant model (GG + GT vs TT) showed an OR of 1.69 (95% CI = [1.07; 2.67], p < 0.05), the homozygote model (GG vs TT) yielded an OR of 1.70 (95% CI = [1.00; 2.88], p < 0.05), and the heterozygote model (GT vs TT) had an OR of 1.64 (95% CI = [1.01; 2.66], p < 0.05). No significant associations were found for rs11568315, rs712830, and rs884225.

Conclusion: The findings from the current meta-analysis confirm that rs712829 within the EGFR gene is significantly associated with lung cancer risk according to the allele, dominant, homozygote and heterozygote models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology is an Open Access peer-reviewed journal publishing original papers describing research in the fields of immunology, pathology and pharmacology. The intention is that the journal should reflect both the experimental and clinical aspects of immunology as well as advances in the understanding of the pathology and pharmacology of the immune system.
期刊最新文献
A new way of the Coombs test using flow cytometry-based assay to assess erythrocytes-bound IgG antibodies in the human and rabbit model. Retraction Notice: "MUC1 expressing tumor growth was retarded after human mucin 1 (MUC1) plasmid DNA immunization". Analysis of total RNA as a potential biomarker of Parkinson's disease in silico. Circulating cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker for prediction of disease activity and prognosis among Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Unveiling the clinical spectrum: Exploring the role of anti-β2glycoprotein-1 antibodies (anti-β2GPI) in antiphospholipid syndrome suspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1