Applying AAPL Ethics and Mission in Forensic Treatment.

Charles C Dike
{"title":"Applying AAPL Ethics and Mission in Forensic Treatment.","authors":"Charles C Dike","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250001-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increased visibility of the patients' rights movement in medicine in recent years has left the erroneous impression that patients and their physicians are on equal footing in the physician-patient relationship. The reality is that vulnerability of patients in this relationship leaves them at the mercy of health care professionals. This is most acute in psychiatry, where patients reveal aspects of their inner being to their psychiatrist, including strange beliefs they would never disclose to their closest friends and family members, whereas psychiatrists, in contrast, reveal close to nothing of themselves to patients. Additionally, distortions of reality can strip patients of social mores and basic humanity and sometimes cause them to commit crimes. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) scholars have espoused the values of treating evaluees professionally and with compassion and respect while upholding their dignity and humanity. These worthy forensic psychiatric writings, however, have unfortunately not always transitioned into the clinical treatment of forensic patients. Reports of patient abuse by staff in psychiatric hospitals, including forensic psychiatric hospitals, remain rampant. Using real-life examples, I apply forensic psychiatric ethics to patient care and offer suggestions of practices and policies that would enhance treatment of patients and decrease the potential for patient abuse in psychiatric hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250001-25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increased visibility of the patients' rights movement in medicine in recent years has left the erroneous impression that patients and their physicians are on equal footing in the physician-patient relationship. The reality is that vulnerability of patients in this relationship leaves them at the mercy of health care professionals. This is most acute in psychiatry, where patients reveal aspects of their inner being to their psychiatrist, including strange beliefs they would never disclose to their closest friends and family members, whereas psychiatrists, in contrast, reveal close to nothing of themselves to patients. Additionally, distortions of reality can strip patients of social mores and basic humanity and sometimes cause them to commit crimes. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) scholars have espoused the values of treating evaluees professionally and with compassion and respect while upholding their dignity and humanity. These worthy forensic psychiatric writings, however, have unfortunately not always transitioned into the clinical treatment of forensic patients. Reports of patient abuse by staff in psychiatric hospitals, including forensic psychiatric hospitals, remain rampant. Using real-life examples, I apply forensic psychiatric ethics to patient care and offer suggestions of practices and policies that would enhance treatment of patients and decrease the potential for patient abuse in psychiatric hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医学伦理与使命的应用
近年来,医学界的患者权利运动越来越引人注目,这给人们留下了一种错误的印象,即患者和医生在医患关系中是平等的。现实情况是,患者在这种关系中的脆弱性使他们受到医疗保健专业人员的摆布。这在精神病学中表现得最为明显,病人会向他们的精神科医生透露他们内心的一些方面,包括他们永远不会向最亲密的朋友和家人透露的奇怪信仰,而精神科医生则相反,几乎不会向病人透露自己的任何事情。此外,对现实的扭曲会剥夺患者的社会道德和基本人性,有时还会导致他们犯罪。美国精神病学与法律学会(American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, AAPL)的学者们支持以专业、同情和尊重的态度对待被评估者,同时维护他们的尊严和人性。然而,不幸的是,这些有价值的法医精神病学著作并不总是转化为法医病人的临床治疗。关于精神病医院,包括法医精神病医院工作人员虐待病人的报告仍然猖獗。通过使用现实生活中的例子,我将法医精神病学伦理应用于病人护理,并提供实践和政策建议,以加强对病人的治疗,减少精神病院虐待病人的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
A Framework for Mandated Reporting for Substance-Related Parental Abuse and Neglect. A Framework for Developing Mental Health Educational Interventions for Correctional Officers. The Role of Community-Based Supportive Services in Remediating Juvenile Adjudicative Competence. Improving Care for Autistic Youth in Correctional Settings. Exploring Secure Recovery Knowledge, Skills, and Education Needs of Forensic Staff.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1