Evaluating Access and Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Pediatric Hirschsprung Disease.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2536-4328
Shruthi Srinivas, Sarah Driesbach, Madeline Su, Aymin Bahhur, Elizabeth Thomas, Casey Trimble, Pooja Zahora, Katherine Bergus, Alessandra C Gasior, Ihab Halaweish, Richard J Wood
{"title":"Evaluating Access and Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Pediatric Hirschsprung Disease.","authors":"Shruthi Srinivas, Sarah Driesbach, Madeline Su, Aymin Bahhur, Elizabeth Thomas, Casey Trimble, Pooja Zahora, Katherine Bergus, Alessandra C Gasior, Ihab Halaweish, Richard J Wood","doi":"10.1055/a-2536-4328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background In patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD), pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is recommended for persistent incontinence or constipation refractory to other treatment, but there are no studies on utilization of PFPT. We aimed to assess clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with successful establishment with PFPT and outcomes following PFPT. Methods We performed a single-institution, retrospective chart review of patients with HD referred to PFPT between 2020 - 2023, involving both exercise and biofeedback. Data were collected on clinical factors, sociodemographics, and symptoms before and after PFPT. Those who \"saw PFPT\", defined as at least one in-person appointment, were compared to those who did not see PFPT; symptomst were also compared. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results There were 83 patients, of which 37 (44.6%) saw PFPT. There were no differences in age, transition zone, prior interventions, or symptoms. Half of patients who saw PFPT only completed an initial visit; one fifth completed the series. Most common reason for failure to see PFPT was scheduling issues. Patients who failed to see PFPT had financial stressors (42.5% vs 16.1%, p=0.02) and required formal support systems (28.2% vs 3.3%, p=0.02). In patients seeing PFPT, incontinence significantly improved (81.1% before vs 40.5% after, p=0.001). Conclusion While PFPT is recommended in children with HD, those with financial stressors or scheduling issues may have barriers to access. However, those who see PFPT have improved symptoms. This suggests a need for improved accessibility of pediatric PFPT to children with HD, such as integration of PFPT into colorectal clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2536-4328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD), pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is recommended for persistent incontinence or constipation refractory to other treatment, but there are no studies on utilization of PFPT. We aimed to assess clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with successful establishment with PFPT and outcomes following PFPT. Methods We performed a single-institution, retrospective chart review of patients with HD referred to PFPT between 2020 - 2023, involving both exercise and biofeedback. Data were collected on clinical factors, sociodemographics, and symptoms before and after PFPT. Those who "saw PFPT", defined as at least one in-person appointment, were compared to those who did not see PFPT; symptomst were also compared. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results There were 83 patients, of which 37 (44.6%) saw PFPT. There were no differences in age, transition zone, prior interventions, or symptoms. Half of patients who saw PFPT only completed an initial visit; one fifth completed the series. Most common reason for failure to see PFPT was scheduling issues. Patients who failed to see PFPT had financial stressors (42.5% vs 16.1%, p=0.02) and required formal support systems (28.2% vs 3.3%, p=0.02). In patients seeing PFPT, incontinence significantly improved (81.1% before vs 40.5% after, p=0.001). Conclusion While PFPT is recommended in children with HD, those with financial stressors or scheduling issues may have barriers to access. However, those who see PFPT have improved symptoms. This suggests a need for improved accessibility of pediatric PFPT to children with HD, such as integration of PFPT into colorectal clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and Complications of Chait Trapdoor Cecostomy in Pediatric Patients with Therapy-Resistant Constipation and Fecal Incontinence: A 14-Year Retrospective Study. Phrenic Nerve Reconstruction in Pediatric Diaphragm Paralysis: Outcomes and Techniques. Diagnostic Accuracy of Uroflowmetry for Urethral Strictures in Pediatric Hypospadias: TIP vs. Non-TIP Outcomes. Distal humeral coronal shear fractures in children and adolescents: Need for cross-sectional imaging and a revised classification. Evaluating Access and Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Pediatric Hirschsprung Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1