Combined genomics and proteomics unveils elusive variants and vast aetiologic heterogeneity in dystonia

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf059
Michael Zech, Ivana Dzinovic, Matej Skorvanek, Philip Harrer, Jan Necpal, Robert Kopajtich, Volker Kittke, Erik Tilch, Chen Zhao, Eugenia Tsoma, Ugo Sorrentino, Elisabetta Indelicato, Antonia Stehr, Alice Saparov, Lucia Abela, Miriam Adamovicova, Alexandra Afenjar, Birgit Assmann, Janette Baloghova, Matthias Baumann, Riccardo Berutti, Zuzana Brezna, Melanie Brugger, Theresa Brunet, Benjamin Cogne, Isabel Colangelo, Erin Conboy, Felix Distelmaier, Matthias Eckenweiler, Barbara Garavaglia, Arie Geerlof, Elisabeth Graf, Annette Hackenberg, Denisa Harvanova, Bernhard Haslinger, Petra Havrankova, Georg F Hoffmann, Wibke G Janzarik, Boris Keren, Miriam Kolnikova, Konstantinos Kolokotronis, Zuzana Kosutzka, Anne Koy, Martin Krenn, Magdalena Krygier, Katarina Kusikova, Oliver Maier, Thomas Meitinger, Christian Mertes, Ivan Milenkovic, Edoardo Monfrini, Andre Santos Dias Mourao, Thomas Musacchio, Mathilde Nizon, Miriam Ostrozovicova, Martin Pavlov, Iva Prihodova, Irena Rektorova, Luigi M Romito, Barbora Rybanska, Ariane Sadr-Nabavi, Susanne Schwenger, Ali Shoeibi, Alexandra Sitzberger, Dmitrii Smirnov, Jana Svantnerova, Raushana Tautanova, Sandra P Toelle, Olga Ulmanova, Francesco Vetrini, Katharina Vill, Matias Wagner, David Weise, Giovanna Zorzi, Alessio Di Fonzo, Konrad Oexle, Steffen Berweck, Volker Mall, Sylvia Boesch, Barbara Schormair, Holger Prokisch, Robert Jech, Juliane Winkelmann
{"title":"Combined genomics and proteomics unveils elusive variants and vast aetiologic heterogeneity in dystonia","authors":"Michael Zech, Ivana Dzinovic, Matej Skorvanek, Philip Harrer, Jan Necpal, Robert Kopajtich, Volker Kittke, Erik Tilch, Chen Zhao, Eugenia Tsoma, Ugo Sorrentino, Elisabetta Indelicato, Antonia Stehr, Alice Saparov, Lucia Abela, Miriam Adamovicova, Alexandra Afenjar, Birgit Assmann, Janette Baloghova, Matthias Baumann, Riccardo Berutti, Zuzana Brezna, Melanie Brugger, Theresa Brunet, Benjamin Cogne, Isabel Colangelo, Erin Conboy, Felix Distelmaier, Matthias Eckenweiler, Barbara Garavaglia, Arie Geerlof, Elisabeth Graf, Annette Hackenberg, Denisa Harvanova, Bernhard Haslinger, Petra Havrankova, Georg F Hoffmann, Wibke G Janzarik, Boris Keren, Miriam Kolnikova, Konstantinos Kolokotronis, Zuzana Kosutzka, Anne Koy, Martin Krenn, Magdalena Krygier, Katarina Kusikova, Oliver Maier, Thomas Meitinger, Christian Mertes, Ivan Milenkovic, Edoardo Monfrini, Andre Santos Dias Mourao, Thomas Musacchio, Mathilde Nizon, Miriam Ostrozovicova, Martin Pavlov, Iva Prihodova, Irena Rektorova, Luigi M Romito, Barbora Rybanska, Ariane Sadr-Nabavi, Susanne Schwenger, Ali Shoeibi, Alexandra Sitzberger, Dmitrii Smirnov, Jana Svantnerova, Raushana Tautanova, Sandra P Toelle, Olga Ulmanova, Francesco Vetrini, Katharina Vill, Matias Wagner, David Weise, Giovanna Zorzi, Alessio Di Fonzo, Konrad Oexle, Steffen Berweck, Volker Mall, Sylvia Boesch, Barbara Schormair, Holger Prokisch, Robert Jech, Juliane Winkelmann","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dystonia is a rare-disease trait for which large-scale genomic investigations are still underrepresented. Genetic heterogeneity among patients with unexplained dystonia warrants interrogation of entire genome sequences, but this has not yet been systematically evaluated. To significantly enhance our understanding of the genetic contribution to dystonia, we (re)analyzed 2,874 whole-exome sequencing (WES), 564 whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as well as 80 fibroblast-derived proteomics datasets, representing the output of high-throughput analyses in 1,990 patients and 973 unaffected relatives from 1,877 families. Recruitment and precision-phenotyping procedures were driven by long-term collaborations of international experts with access to overlooked populations. By exploring WES data, we found that continuous scaling of sample sizes resulted in steady gains in the number of associated disease genes without plateauing. On average, every second diagnosis involved a gene not previously implicated in our cohort. Second-line WGS focused on a subcohort of undiagnosed individuals with high likelihood of having monogenic forms of dystonia, comprising large proportions of patients with early onset (81.3%), generalized symptom distribution (50.8%) and/or coexisting features (68.9%). We undertook extensive searches for variants in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes to uncover 38 (ultra)rare diagnostic-grade findings in 37 of 305 index patients (12.1%), many of which had remained undetected due to methodological inferiority of WES or pipeline limitations. WGS-identified elusive variations included alterations in exons poorly covered by WES, RNA-gene variants, mitochondrial-DNA mutations, small copy-number variants, complex rearranged genome structure, and short tandem repeats. For improved variant interpretation in WGS-inconclusive cases, we employed systematic integration of quantitative proteomics. This aided in verifying diagnoses related to technically challenging variants and in upgrading a variant of uncertain significance (3 of 70 WGS-inconclusive index patients, 4.3%). Further, unsupervised proteomic outlier-analysis supplemented with transcriptome sequencing revealed pathological gene underexpression induced by transcript disruptions in three more index patients with underlying (deep) intronic variants (3/70, 4.3%), highlighting the potential for targeted antisense-oligonucleotide therapy development. Finally, trio-WGS prioritized a de-novo missense change in the candidate PRMT1, encoding a histone-methyltransferase. Data-sharing strategies supported the discovery of three distinct PRMT1 de-novo variants in four phenotypically similar patients, associated with loss-of-function effects in in-vitro assays. This work underscores the importance of continually expanding sequencing cohorts to characterize the extensive spectrum of gene aberrations in dystonia. We show that a pool of unresolved cases is amenable to WGS and complementary multi-omic studies, directing advanced etiopathological concepts and future diagnostic-practice workflows for dystonia.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dystonia is a rare-disease trait for which large-scale genomic investigations are still underrepresented. Genetic heterogeneity among patients with unexplained dystonia warrants interrogation of entire genome sequences, but this has not yet been systematically evaluated. To significantly enhance our understanding of the genetic contribution to dystonia, we (re)analyzed 2,874 whole-exome sequencing (WES), 564 whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as well as 80 fibroblast-derived proteomics datasets, representing the output of high-throughput analyses in 1,990 patients and 973 unaffected relatives from 1,877 families. Recruitment and precision-phenotyping procedures were driven by long-term collaborations of international experts with access to overlooked populations. By exploring WES data, we found that continuous scaling of sample sizes resulted in steady gains in the number of associated disease genes without plateauing. On average, every second diagnosis involved a gene not previously implicated in our cohort. Second-line WGS focused on a subcohort of undiagnosed individuals with high likelihood of having monogenic forms of dystonia, comprising large proportions of patients with early onset (81.3%), generalized symptom distribution (50.8%) and/or coexisting features (68.9%). We undertook extensive searches for variants in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes to uncover 38 (ultra)rare diagnostic-grade findings in 37 of 305 index patients (12.1%), many of which had remained undetected due to methodological inferiority of WES or pipeline limitations. WGS-identified elusive variations included alterations in exons poorly covered by WES, RNA-gene variants, mitochondrial-DNA mutations, small copy-number variants, complex rearranged genome structure, and short tandem repeats. For improved variant interpretation in WGS-inconclusive cases, we employed systematic integration of quantitative proteomics. This aided in verifying diagnoses related to technically challenging variants and in upgrading a variant of uncertain significance (3 of 70 WGS-inconclusive index patients, 4.3%). Further, unsupervised proteomic outlier-analysis supplemented with transcriptome sequencing revealed pathological gene underexpression induced by transcript disruptions in three more index patients with underlying (deep) intronic variants (3/70, 4.3%), highlighting the potential for targeted antisense-oligonucleotide therapy development. Finally, trio-WGS prioritized a de-novo missense change in the candidate PRMT1, encoding a histone-methyltransferase. Data-sharing strategies supported the discovery of three distinct PRMT1 de-novo variants in four phenotypically similar patients, associated with loss-of-function effects in in-vitro assays. This work underscores the importance of continually expanding sequencing cohorts to characterize the extensive spectrum of gene aberrations in dystonia. We show that a pool of unresolved cases is amenable to WGS and complementary multi-omic studies, directing advanced etiopathological concepts and future diagnostic-practice workflows for dystonia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合基因组学和蛋白质组学揭示了肌张力障碍中难以捉摸的变异和巨大的病因异质性
肌张力障碍是一种罕见的疾病特征,大规模的基因组研究仍然缺乏代表性。不明原因的肌张力障碍患者的遗传异质性需要对整个基因组序列进行调查,但这尚未得到系统的评估。为了显著提高我们对肌张力障碍遗传贡献的理解,我们(重新)分析了2,874个全外显子组测序(WES), 564个全基因组测序(WGS)以及80个成纤维细胞衍生的蛋白质组学数据集,代表了来自1,877个家庭的1,990名患者和973名未受影响的亲属的高通量分析结果。招募和精确表型程序是由国际专家的长期合作推动的,他们可以接触到被忽视的人群。通过探索WES数据,我们发现样本量的持续缩放导致相关疾病基因数量的稳定增长而没有停滞。平均而言,每一秒的诊断都涉及到一个以前在我们的队列中没有涉及的基因。二线WGS集中在一个未确诊的个体亚队列中,这些个体极有可能患有单基因形式的肌张力障碍,包括大部分早发(81.3%)、全身性症状分布(50.8%)和/或共存特征(68.9%)的患者。我们对核和线粒体基因组的变异进行了广泛的搜索,在305例指数患者中的37例(12.1%)中发现了38个(超)罕见的诊断级发现,其中许多由于WES方法的不足或管道限制而未被发现。wgs鉴定的难以捉摸的变异包括WES未覆盖的外显子的改变、rna -基因变异、线粒体- dna突变、小拷贝数变异、复杂的重排基因组结构和短串联重复。为了改进wgs不确定病例的变异解释,我们采用了定量蛋白质组学的系统整合。这有助于验证与技术上具有挑战性的变异相关的诊断,并提升不确定意义的变异(70例wgs不确定指数患者中有3例,4.3%)。此外,无监督的蛋白质组学异常值分析与转录组测序相结合,揭示了另外三名具有潜在(深层)内含子变异的指数患者(3/70,4.3%)的转录中断引起的病理性基因低表达,突出了靶向反义寡核苷酸治疗发展的潜力。最后,trio-WGS优先考虑候选PRMT1的从头错义改变,编码组蛋白甲基转移酶。数据共享策略支持在四个表型相似的患者中发现三种不同的PRMT1 de-novo变异,这些变异在体外分析中与功能丧失效应相关。这项工作强调了不断扩大测序队列的重要性,以表征肌张力障碍中广泛的基因畸变谱。我们表明,一群未解决的病例适合WGS和互补的多组学研究,指导肌张力障碍的先进病因病理学概念和未来的诊断实践工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Blunted response of caudal locus coeruleus to arousing stimuli in Parkinson’s disease Oxytocin receptor neurons in the paraventricular thalamus as a nexus for social behaviour and fear. Tau pathology in epilepsy: emerging mechanisms and translational opportunities Forget processing speed: cognitive changes in multiple sclerosis call for new measurement tools. What comes next for global neurology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1