The use of the 19Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver in operative hysteroscopy for benign intracavitary lesions: A feasibility study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.005
Stefan Timmerman , Helena Van Kerrebroeck , Ashleigh Ledger , Kobe Dewilde , Rik Van Severen , Thierry Van den Bosch , Wouter Froyman
{"title":"The use of the 19Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver in operative hysteroscopy for benign intracavitary lesions: A feasibility study","authors":"Stefan Timmerman ,&nbsp;Helena Van Kerrebroeck ,&nbsp;Ashleigh Ledger ,&nbsp;Kobe Dewilde ,&nbsp;Rik Van Severen ,&nbsp;Thierry Van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Wouter Froyman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment of common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus, such as endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, and retained products of conception (RPOC) has evolved significantly over the past decades. Hysteroscopic tissue removal (morcellation) was introduced as an alternative to the traditional operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic excision, due to concerns regarding thermal damage and impaired visibility. Recently, with the aim of promoting a minimally invasive approach and the possibility of use in an office setting, smaller diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal systems were designed, such as the reusable 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This prospective study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of using the 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®) for benign intracavitary lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a multicentric prospective cohort study among patients with suspected benign intracavitary lesions. Procedures were performed using the 19 Fr. BIGATTI Shaver under sedation or general anaesthesia. Data on procedure characteristics and complications were collected prospectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-eight patients were included, of which the majority had endometrial polyps. Complete resection was achieved in all cases, with only in 5 % need for additional techniques after hysteroscopic tissue removal during the same intervention. Operator satisfaction was generally high, particularly for endometrial polyps. However, challenges were encountered with RPOC, including 2 cases of excessive bleeding and longer tissue removal times (2 min for endometrial polyps vs 4.5 for RPOC). Postoperative complications were rare (2 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the 19 Fr. IBS® for benign intracavitary lesions, particularly for endometrial polyps. Further research is warranted to validate the device’s utility in broader clinical contexts and to address specific challenges associated with different lesion types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 197-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525000661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment of common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus, such as endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, and retained products of conception (RPOC) has evolved significantly over the past decades. Hysteroscopic tissue removal (morcellation) was introduced as an alternative to the traditional operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic excision, due to concerns regarding thermal damage and impaired visibility. Recently, with the aim of promoting a minimally invasive approach and the possibility of use in an office setting, smaller diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal systems were designed, such as the reusable 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This prospective study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of using the 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®) for benign intracavitary lesions.

Methods

We performed a multicentric prospective cohort study among patients with suspected benign intracavitary lesions. Procedures were performed using the 19 Fr. BIGATTI Shaver under sedation or general anaesthesia. Data on procedure characteristics and complications were collected prospectively.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included, of which the majority had endometrial polyps. Complete resection was achieved in all cases, with only in 5 % need for additional techniques after hysteroscopic tissue removal during the same intervention. Operator satisfaction was generally high, particularly for endometrial polyps. However, challenges were encountered with RPOC, including 2 cases of excessive bleeding and longer tissue removal times (2 min for endometrial polyps vs 4.5 for RPOC). Postoperative complications were rare (2 %).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the 19 Fr. IBS® for benign intracavitary lesions, particularly for endometrial polyps. Further research is warranted to validate the device’s utility in broader clinical contexts and to address specific challenges associated with different lesion types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Six versus twelve hours of intrauterine balloons placement for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis Voluntary multifetal pregnancy reduction: who should decide and select, and why? A direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ST segment analysis (STAN) and fetal scalp blood sample lactate: A population-based observational study Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage ovarian cancer: A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1