The use of the 19Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver in operative hysteroscopy for benign intracavitary lesions: A feasibility study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.005
Stefan Timmerman , Helena Van Kerrebroeck , Ashleigh Ledger , Kobe Dewilde , Rik Van Severen , Thierry Van den Bosch , Wouter Froyman
{"title":"The use of the 19Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver in operative hysteroscopy for benign intracavitary lesions: A feasibility study","authors":"Stefan Timmerman ,&nbsp;Helena Van Kerrebroeck ,&nbsp;Ashleigh Ledger ,&nbsp;Kobe Dewilde ,&nbsp;Rik Van Severen ,&nbsp;Thierry Van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Wouter Froyman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment of common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus, such as endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, and retained products of conception (RPOC) has evolved significantly over the past decades. Hysteroscopic tissue removal (morcellation) was introduced as an alternative to the traditional operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic excision, due to concerns regarding thermal damage and impaired visibility. Recently, with the aim of promoting a minimally invasive approach and the possibility of use in an office setting, smaller diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal systems were designed, such as the reusable 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This prospective study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of using the 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®) for benign intracavitary lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a multicentric prospective cohort study among patients with suspected benign intracavitary lesions. Procedures were performed using the 19 Fr. BIGATTI Shaver under sedation or general anaesthesia. Data on procedure characteristics and complications were collected prospectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-eight patients were included, of which the majority had endometrial polyps. Complete resection was achieved in all cases, with only in 5 % need for additional techniques after hysteroscopic tissue removal during the same intervention. Operator satisfaction was generally high, particularly for endometrial polyps. However, challenges were encountered with RPOC, including 2 cases of excessive bleeding and longer tissue removal times (2 min for endometrial polyps vs 4.5 for RPOC). Postoperative complications were rare (2 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the 19 Fr. IBS® for benign intracavitary lesions, particularly for endometrial polyps. Further research is warranted to validate the device’s utility in broader clinical contexts and to address specific challenges associated with different lesion types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 197-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525000661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment of common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus, such as endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, and retained products of conception (RPOC) has evolved significantly over the past decades. Hysteroscopic tissue removal (morcellation) was introduced as an alternative to the traditional operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic excision, due to concerns regarding thermal damage and impaired visibility. Recently, with the aim of promoting a minimally invasive approach and the possibility of use in an office setting, smaller diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal systems were designed, such as the reusable 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This prospective study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of using the 19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®) for benign intracavitary lesions.

Methods

We performed a multicentric prospective cohort study among patients with suspected benign intracavitary lesions. Procedures were performed using the 19 Fr. BIGATTI Shaver under sedation or general anaesthesia. Data on procedure characteristics and complications were collected prospectively.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included, of which the majority had endometrial polyps. Complete resection was achieved in all cases, with only in 5 % need for additional techniques after hysteroscopic tissue removal during the same intervention. Operator satisfaction was generally high, particularly for endometrial polyps. However, challenges were encountered with RPOC, including 2 cases of excessive bleeding and longer tissue removal times (2 min for endometrial polyps vs 4.5 for RPOC). Postoperative complications were rare (2 %).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the 19 Fr. IBS® for benign intracavitary lesions, particularly for endometrial polyps. Further research is warranted to validate the device’s utility in broader clinical contexts and to address specific challenges associated with different lesion types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19Fr的使用。宫内BIGATTI刮刀用于宫腔镜手术治疗良性腔内病变的可行性研究
背景:在过去的几十年里,子宫内常见的良性腔内病变,如子宫内膜息肉、粘膜下肌瘤和妊娠残留(RPOC)的治疗有了显著的发展。由于担心热损伤和可视性受损,宫腔镜组织切除(碎化)被引入作为传统手术宫腔镜双极切除的替代方法。最近,为了促进微创方法和在办公室环境中使用的可能性,设计了更小直径的宫腔镜组织去除系统,例如可重复使用的19 Fr. Intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®)。本前瞻性研究旨在评估使用19 Fr.宫内BIGATTI刮刀(IBS®)治疗良性腔内病变的可行性和结果。方法我们对疑似良性腔内病变的患者进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。手术在镇静或全身麻醉下使用19 Fr. BIGATTI剃须刀进行。前瞻性地收集手术特点和并发症的数据。结果本组患者58例,以子宫内膜息肉为主。在所有病例中均实现了完全切除,在相同的干预期间,只有5%的病例需要在宫腔镜下组织切除后进行额外的技术。手术者的满意度普遍较高,尤其是子宫内膜息肉。然而,RPOC遇到了挑战,包括2例过度出血和较长的组织切除时间(子宫内膜息肉为2分钟,RPOC为4.5分钟)。术后并发症罕见(2%)。结论本研究证明了19fr . IBS®治疗良性腔内病变,特别是子宫内膜息肉的可行性和安全性。需要进一步的研究来验证该设备在更广泛的临床环境中的实用性,并解决与不同病变类型相关的具体挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Home-telemonitoring of fetal and maternal condition in complicated pregnancies: Results from a real-world cohort to understand unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions The safety of vaginal delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury- A retrospective pilot study using transperineal ultrasound algorithm Association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis Pretreatment decrease of the anti-müllerian hormone level does not translate into the proportionally lower efficiency of ovarian stimulation in patients with haematological malignancies A pre-post prospective study on the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) unit in the management of endometriosis pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1