The Physical Activity Health Paradox in Type 2 Diabetes

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.018
Anna Stage MSc , Rasmus Wibaek PhD , Pernille F. Rønn PhD , Kirsten S. Bjørnsbo PhD , Charlotte Brøns PhD , Karen Allesøe PhD , Andreas Holtermann PhD , Allan A. Vaag PhD , Allan Linneberg PhD , Mette Aadahl PhD
{"title":"The Physical Activity Health Paradox in Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Anna Stage MSc ,&nbsp;Rasmus Wibaek PhD ,&nbsp;Pernille F. Rønn PhD ,&nbsp;Kirsten S. Bjørnsbo PhD ,&nbsp;Charlotte Brøns PhD ,&nbsp;Karen Allesøe PhD ,&nbsp;Andreas Holtermann PhD ,&nbsp;Allan A. Vaag PhD ,&nbsp;Allan Linneberg PhD ,&nbsp;Mette Aadahl PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The physical activity health paradox refers to the contrasting associations of leisure-time physical activity and occupational physical activity with cardiovascular disease, but whether this applies to Type 2 diabetes risk is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the physical activity health paradox and age-specific Type 2 diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Working adults (N=5,866) in Denmark aged 30–60 years enrolled in the Inter99 cohort at baseline in 1999 were followed in a Diabetes Register. Incidence rates of Type 2 diabetes as a function of age, sex, and separate and combined levels of self-reported occupational physical activity and leisure-time physical activity were modeled using Poisson regression, adjusting for relevant covariates in separate analyses (2024).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity was associated with lower risk of Type 2 diabetes than light (rate ratio=0.63, 95% CI=0.46, 0.85). Strenuous occupational physical activity was associated with a slightly higher risk of Type 2 diabetes than moderate occupational physical activity, but the association diminished adjusted for covariates (rate ratio=1.12, 95% CI=0.79, 1.58). Sedentary leisure-time physical activity combined with any level of occupational physical activity was associated with higher risk of Type 2 diabetes than light leisure-time physical activity/moderate occupational physical activity combined (e.g., sedentary leisure-time physical activity and demanding occupational physical activity) (rate ratio=1.68, 95% CI=1.14, 2.48). Moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity combined with any level of occupational physical activity was associated with lower risk of Type 2 diabetes (e.g., moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity and moderate occupational physical activity) (rate ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.39, 0.92).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Leisure-time physical activity lowered the risk of Type 2 diabetes regardless of the level of occupational physical activity, whereas no similar beneficial effects were found for occupational physical activity level. The differential effects of occupational physical activity and leisure-time physical activity on Type 2 diabetes suggest that the paradox may also exist in Type 2 diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"Pages 545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379724004136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The physical activity health paradox refers to the contrasting associations of leisure-time physical activity and occupational physical activity with cardiovascular disease, but whether this applies to Type 2 diabetes risk is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the physical activity health paradox and age-specific Type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Working adults (N=5,866) in Denmark aged 30–60 years enrolled in the Inter99 cohort at baseline in 1999 were followed in a Diabetes Register. Incidence rates of Type 2 diabetes as a function of age, sex, and separate and combined levels of self-reported occupational physical activity and leisure-time physical activity were modeled using Poisson regression, adjusting for relevant covariates in separate analyses (2024).

Results

Moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity was associated with lower risk of Type 2 diabetes than light (rate ratio=0.63, 95% CI=0.46, 0.85). Strenuous occupational physical activity was associated with a slightly higher risk of Type 2 diabetes than moderate occupational physical activity, but the association diminished adjusted for covariates (rate ratio=1.12, 95% CI=0.79, 1.58). Sedentary leisure-time physical activity combined with any level of occupational physical activity was associated with higher risk of Type 2 diabetes than light leisure-time physical activity/moderate occupational physical activity combined (e.g., sedentary leisure-time physical activity and demanding occupational physical activity) (rate ratio=1.68, 95% CI=1.14, 2.48). Moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity combined with any level of occupational physical activity was associated with lower risk of Type 2 diabetes (e.g., moderate/vigorous leisure-time physical activity and moderate occupational physical activity) (rate ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.39, 0.92).

Conclusions

Leisure-time physical activity lowered the risk of Type 2 diabetes regardless of the level of occupational physical activity, whereas no similar beneficial effects were found for occupational physical activity level. The differential effects of occupational physical activity and leisure-time physical activity on Type 2 diabetes suggest that the paradox may also exist in Type 2 diabetes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病的运动健康悖论
体力活动健康悖论指的是休闲时间体力活动和职业体力活动与心血管疾病的对比关系,但这是否适用于2型糖尿病的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨运动健康悖论与年龄特异性2型糖尿病的关系。方法:在丹麦,年龄在30-60岁的工作成年人(N= 5866)在1999年基线时加入Inter99队列,在糖尿病登记册中进行随访。2型糖尿病的发病率作为年龄、性别以及自我报告的职业体力活动和休闲时间体力活动的单独和组合水平的函数,使用泊松回归建模,并在单独分析中调整相关协变量(2024)。结果:与轻度运动相比,中度/剧烈的休闲时间体育活动与2型糖尿病的风险较低相关(比率比=0.63,95% CI=0.46, 0.85)。剧烈的职业体力活动与2型糖尿病风险的相关性略高于中度职业体力活动,但调整协变量后相关性减弱(比率比=1.12,95% CI=0.79, 1.58)。与轻度休闲体育活动/中度职业体育活动相结合(例如,久坐休闲体育活动和高要求职业体育活动)相比,久坐休闲体育活动与任何水平的职业体育活动相结合与2型糖尿病的风险更高(比率比=1.68,95% CI=1.14, 2.48)。适度/剧烈的休闲时间体力活动与任何水平的职业体力活动相结合与2型糖尿病的风险降低相关(例如,适度/剧烈的休闲时间体力活动和适度的职业体力活动)(比率比=0.6,95% CI=0.39, 0.92)。结论与职业体力活动水平无关,休闲时间体力活动可降低2型糖尿病的发病风险,而与职业体力活动水平无关。职业体力活动和休闲体力活动对2型糖尿病的不同影响表明,这种悖论可能也存在于2型糖尿病中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Effect Ultraprocessed Foods Taxation on Overweight Prevalence and Noncommunicable Diseases in Brazil. Estimation of Nonfatal Injury Prevalence Among Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2020, 2021, and 2023 Correlates of Diagnostic Codes for Documenting Housing Instability: A Citywide Cohort Study Resolving the Paradox of Training in Preventive Medicine The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cancer Screening: Findings From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1