Autoantibodies targeting angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 are prevalent and not induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The FASEB Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1096/fj.202402694R
Yannick Galipeau, Nicolas Castonguay, Pauline S. McCluskie, Mayra Trentin Sonoda, Alexa Keeshan, Erin Collins, Corey Arnold, Martin Pelchat, Kevin Burns, Curtis Cooper, Marc-André Langlois
{"title":"Autoantibodies targeting angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 are prevalent and not induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection","authors":"Yannick Galipeau,&nbsp;Nicolas Castonguay,&nbsp;Pauline S. McCluskie,&nbsp;Mayra Trentin Sonoda,&nbsp;Alexa Keeshan,&nbsp;Erin Collins,&nbsp;Corey Arnold,&nbsp;Martin Pelchat,&nbsp;Kevin Burns,&nbsp;Curtis Cooper,&nbsp;Marc-André Langlois","doi":"10.1096/fj.202402694R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical outcomes resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection vary widely, ranging from asymptomatic cases to the development of mild to severe respiratory illness, and in some instances, chronic lingering disease and mortality. The underlying biological mechanisms driving this wide spectrum of pathogenicity among certain individuals and demographics remain elusive. Autoantibodies have emerged as potential contributors to the severity of COVID-19. Although preliminary reports have suggested the induction of antibodies targeting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme II (ACE2) post-infection, this assertion lacks confirmation in large-scale studies. In this study, our objective is to comprehensively characterize and quantify the prevalence and expression levels of autoantibodies directed against ACE2 in a sizable cohort (<i>n</i> = 464). Our findings reveal that ACE2-reactive IgM antibodies are the most prevalent, with an overall seroprevalence of 18.8%, followed by IgG at 10.3% and IgA at 6.3%. Longitudinal analysis of individuals with multiple blood draws showed stable ACE2 IgG and IgA levels over time. Upon stratifying individuals based on molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 or serological evidence of past infection, no significant differences were observed between groups. Functional assessment of ACE2 autoantibodies demonstrated that they are non-neutralizing and failed to inhibit spike-ACE2 interaction or affect the enzymatic activity of ACE2. Our results highlight that ACE2 autoantibodies are prevalent in the general population and were not induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort. Notably, we found no substantiated evidence supporting a direct role for ACE2 autoantibodies in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50455,"journal":{"name":"The FASEB Journal","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1096/fj.202402694R","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FASEB Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fj.202402694R","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical outcomes resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection vary widely, ranging from asymptomatic cases to the development of mild to severe respiratory illness, and in some instances, chronic lingering disease and mortality. The underlying biological mechanisms driving this wide spectrum of pathogenicity among certain individuals and demographics remain elusive. Autoantibodies have emerged as potential contributors to the severity of COVID-19. Although preliminary reports have suggested the induction of antibodies targeting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme II (ACE2) post-infection, this assertion lacks confirmation in large-scale studies. In this study, our objective is to comprehensively characterize and quantify the prevalence and expression levels of autoantibodies directed against ACE2 in a sizable cohort (n = 464). Our findings reveal that ACE2-reactive IgM antibodies are the most prevalent, with an overall seroprevalence of 18.8%, followed by IgG at 10.3% and IgA at 6.3%. Longitudinal analysis of individuals with multiple blood draws showed stable ACE2 IgG and IgA levels over time. Upon stratifying individuals based on molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 or serological evidence of past infection, no significant differences were observed between groups. Functional assessment of ACE2 autoantibodies demonstrated that they are non-neutralizing and failed to inhibit spike-ACE2 interaction or affect the enzymatic activity of ACE2. Our results highlight that ACE2 autoantibodies are prevalent in the general population and were not induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort. Notably, we found no substantiated evidence supporting a direct role for ACE2 autoantibodies in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对血管紧张素转换酶2的自身抗体是普遍存在的,并且不是由SARS-CoV-2感染诱导的
SARS-CoV-2感染导致的临床结果差异很大,从无症状病例到发展为轻度至重度呼吸道疾病,在某些情况下,还会出现慢性后遗症和死亡。在某些个体和人口统计学中驱动这种广泛致病性的潜在生物学机制仍然难以捉摸。自身抗体已成为导致COVID-19严重程度的潜在因素。虽然初步报告表明感染后会诱导针对血管紧张素转换酶II (ACE2)的抗体,但这一说法缺乏大规模研究的证实。在这项研究中,我们的目标是在一个相当大的队列中(n = 464)全面表征和量化针对ACE2的自身抗体的患病率和表达水平。我们的研究结果显示,ace2反应性IgM抗体最为普遍,总体血清阳性率为18.8%,其次是IgG(10.3%)和IgA(6.3%)。多次抽血个体的纵向分析显示,随着时间的推移,ACE2 IgG和IgA水平稳定。根据SARS-CoV-2分子检测或既往感染的血清学证据对个体进行分层后,各组之间未观察到显著差异。ACE2自身抗体的功能评估表明,它们是非中和性的,不能抑制ACE2 - spike相互作用或影响ACE2的酶活性。我们的研究结果强调,ACE2自身抗体在一般人群中普遍存在,并且在我们的队列中不是由SARS-CoV-2感染诱导的。值得注意的是,我们没有发现确凿的证据支持ACE2自身抗体在SARS-CoV-2发病机制中的直接作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The FASEB Journal
The FASEB Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
6243
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The FASEB Journal publishes international, transdisciplinary research covering all fields of biology at every level of organization: atomic, molecular, cell, tissue, organ, organismic and population. While the journal strives to include research that cuts across the biological sciences, it also considers submissions that lie within one field, but may have implications for other fields as well. The journal seeks to publish basic and translational research, but also welcomes reports of pre-clinical and early clinical research. In addition to research, review, and hypothesis submissions, The FASEB Journal also seeks perspectives, commentaries, book reviews, and similar content related to the life sciences in its Up Front section.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation on Inflammation and Recovery in Sports: A Meta-Analysis. Metformin-Loaded Schwann Cell Exosomes Reprogram Macrophages and Enhance Neurogenesis in Spinal Cord Injury Through PI3K/AKT Activation. Identification of ADAMTS5 as APP-Cleaving Enzyme at the APP669 Site. Contrasting Effects of Chronic Glucokinase Activation and Inhibition on Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function. Peptide Angio-3 Attenuates Pulmonary Fibrosis Via Modulation of the Coagulation Factor Xa-Protease-Activated Receptor-1 Signaling Axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1