What Weber Got Right About Brahmins—Testing His Theories About South Asian Caste Hierarchies

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/jhbs.70018
Satanik Pal
{"title":"What Weber Got Right About Brahmins—Testing His Theories About South Asian Caste Hierarchies","authors":"Satanik Pal","doi":"10.1002/jhbs.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The following article is an assessment of Max Weber's depiction of Brahmins and ascetics in South Asia. Using contemporary historical analyses, the article has attempted to demonstrate the validity of Weber's analyses in his seminal treatise on South Asian society, “The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism” that he had originally published in German in 1916. Upon examining the accuracy of Weber's descriptions regarding the domination of Brahmins in South Asian society in contrast to Dumont's assertions in his seminal work “Homo Hierarchicus” published in 1966, we find Weber's portrayal to be significantly more accurate. These findings indicate that caste groups in South Asia can be deemed comparable to status groups in Western societies, by utilizing a Weberian methodology rather than a Dumontian one. The correlation of power and status by the former have significant implications for sociological theories related to caste/status in South Asia and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":46047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhbs.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following article is an assessment of Max Weber's depiction of Brahmins and ascetics in South Asia. Using contemporary historical analyses, the article has attempted to demonstrate the validity of Weber's analyses in his seminal treatise on South Asian society, “The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism” that he had originally published in German in 1916. Upon examining the accuracy of Weber's descriptions regarding the domination of Brahmins in South Asian society in contrast to Dumont's assertions in his seminal work “Homo Hierarchicus” published in 1966, we find Weber's portrayal to be significantly more accurate. These findings indicate that caste groups in South Asia can be deemed comparable to status groups in Western societies, by utilizing a Weberian methodology rather than a Dumontian one. The correlation of power and status by the former have significant implications for sociological theories related to caste/status in South Asia and beyond.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韦伯关于婆罗门的正确之处——检验他关于南亚种姓制度的理论
下面这篇文章是对马克斯·韦伯对南亚婆罗门和苦行僧的描述的评价。本文利用当代历史分析,试图证明韦伯在其关于南亚社会的开创性论文《印度的宗教:印度教和佛教的社会学》中的分析的有效性,韦伯最初于1916年以德语出版。在考察韦伯关于婆罗门在南亚社会的统治地位的描述的准确性时,我们发现韦伯的描述比杜蒙在其1966年出版的开创性著作《等级人》(Homo Hierarchicus)中的断言要准确得多。这些发现表明,南亚的种姓群体可以被认为与西方社会的地位群体相媲美,通过使用韦伯的方法而不是杜蒙的方法。前者对权力和地位的相关性对南亚及其他地区与种姓/地位相关的社会学理论具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to the scientific, technical, institutional, and cultural history of the social and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes research articles, book reviews, and news and notes that cover the development of the core disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, economics, linguistics, communications, political science, and the neurosciences. The journal also welcomes papers and book reviews in related fields, particularly the history of science and medicine, historical theory, and historiography.
期刊最新文献
"The Way They Speak of Masters and Johnson": The Rise and Disappearance of Sex Therapy, 1960-2000. The Product of Medicine: How Efficiency Made American Health Care. By Caitjan Gainty. Duke University Press, 2025. 225 pp. $99.95 (cloth). ISBN: 1-47-802842-4 Book Review on “A People's History of Psychoanalysis” By Florent Gabarron-Garcia (Shuli Branson, trans.), Pluto Press, 2025. 256 pp. £11.99 (ebook). ISBN: 978-0-74-534959-6 Yang Kuo-Shu and the Indigenous Movements of Psychology in China From the Perspective of History Debunking “When Prophecy Fails”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1