Prognostic Models of Mortality Following First-Ever Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70445
Mustapha Mohammed, Hadzliana Zainal, Siew Chin Ong, Balamurugan Tangiisuran, Fatimatuzzahra Abdul Aziz, Norsima N. Sidek, Abubakar Sha'aban, Umar Idris Ibrahim, Surajuddeen Muhammad, Irene Looi, Zariah A. Aziz
{"title":"Prognostic Models of Mortality Following First-Ever Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Mustapha Mohammed,&nbsp;Hadzliana Zainal,&nbsp;Siew Chin Ong,&nbsp;Balamurugan Tangiisuran,&nbsp;Fatimatuzzahra Abdul Aziz,&nbsp;Norsima N. Sidek,&nbsp;Abubakar Sha'aban,&nbsp;Umar Idris Ibrahim,&nbsp;Surajuddeen Muhammad,&nbsp;Irene Looi,&nbsp;Zariah A. Aziz","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>There is a lack of population-based studies focusing on guideline-based prognostic models for stroke. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic model that predicts mortality following a first-ever acute ischemic stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 899 adult patients ( ≥ 18 years) with confirmed diagnosis of first-ever acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the Malaysian National Stroke Registry (NSR) from January 2009 to December 2019. The primary outcome was mortality within 90 days post-stroke (266 events [29.6%]). The prognostic model was developed using logistic regression (75%, <i>n</i> = 674) and internally validated (25%, <i>n</i> = 225). Model performance was assessed using discrimination (area under the curve (AUC]) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test [HL]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final model includes factors associated with increased risk of mortality, such as age (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.06 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.03, 1.10; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score aOR 1.08 (95% CI 1.08, 1.13; <i>p </i>= 0.004), and diabetes aOR 2.29 (95% CI 1.20, 4.37; <i>p</i> = 0.012). The protective factors were antiplatelet within 48 h. aOR 0.40 (95% CI 0.19, 0.81; <i>p</i> = 0.01), dysphagia screening aOR 0.30 (95% CI 0.15, 0.61; <i>p</i> = 0.001), antiplatelets upon discharge aOR 0.17 (95% CI 0.08, 0.35; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001), lipid-lowering therapy aOR 0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.82; <i>p</i> = 0.01), stroke education aOR 0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.05; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and rehabilitation aOR 0.08 (95% CI 0.04, 0.16; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The model demonstrated excellent performance (discrimination [AUC = 0.94] and calibration [HL, <i>X</i><sup>2</sup> <i>p </i>= 0.63]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study developed a validated prognostic model that excellently predicts mortality after a first-ever acute ischemic stroke with potential clinical utility in acute stroke care decision-making. The predictors could be valuable for creating risk calculators and aiding healthcare providers and patients in making well-informed clinical decisions during the stroke care process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70445","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

There is a lack of population-based studies focusing on guideline-based prognostic models for stroke. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic model that predicts mortality following a first-ever acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

The study included 899 adult patients ( ≥ 18 years) with confirmed diagnosis of first-ever acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the Malaysian National Stroke Registry (NSR) from January 2009 to December 2019. The primary outcome was mortality within 90 days post-stroke (266 events [29.6%]). The prognostic model was developed using logistic regression (75%, n = 674) and internally validated (25%, n = 225). Model performance was assessed using discrimination (area under the curve (AUC]) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test [HL]).

Results

The final model includes factors associated with increased risk of mortality, such as age (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.06 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.03, 1.10; p < 0.001]), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score aOR 1.08 (95% CI 1.08, 1.13; p = 0.004), and diabetes aOR 2.29 (95% CI 1.20, 4.37; p = 0.012). The protective factors were antiplatelet within 48 h. aOR 0.40 (95% CI 0.19, 0.81; p = 0.01), dysphagia screening aOR 0.30 (95% CI 0.15, 0.61; p = 0.001), antiplatelets upon discharge aOR 0.17 (95% CI 0.08, 0.35; p < 0.001), lipid-lowering therapy aOR 0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.82; p = 0.01), stroke education aOR 0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.05; p < 0.001) and rehabilitation aOR 0.08 (95% CI 0.04, 0.16; p < 0.001). The model demonstrated excellent performance (discrimination [AUC = 0.94] and calibration [HL, X2 p = 0.63]).

Conclusion

The study developed a validated prognostic model that excellently predicts mortality after a first-ever acute ischemic stroke with potential clinical utility in acute stroke care decision-making. The predictors could be valuable for creating risk calculators and aiding healthcare providers and patients in making well-informed clinical decisions during the stroke care process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次急性缺血性卒中后死亡率的预后模型:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
背景和目的缺乏以人群为基础的研究,重点关注以指南为基础的卒中预后模型。本研究旨在开发和验证预测首次急性缺血性中风后死亡率的预后模型。方法:该研究纳入了2009年1月至2019年12月在马来西亚国家卒中登记处(NSR)登记的确诊为首次急性缺血性卒中的899名成年患者(≥18岁)。主要终点是卒中后90天内的死亡率(266例,29.6%)。采用逻辑回归(75%,n = 674)建立预后模型,并进行内部验证(25%,n = 225)。采用判别法(曲线下面积(AUC))和校准法(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验[HL])评估模型性能。结果最终模型包括与死亡风险增加相关的因素,如年龄(调整优势比,aOR 1.06)[95%置信区间,CI 1.03, 1.10;p < 0.001]),美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分or为1.08 (95% CI 1.08, 1.13;p = 0.004),糖尿病aOR为2.29 (95% CI 1.20, 4.37;p = 0.012)。保护性因素为48 h内抗血小板aOR 0.40 (95% CI 0.19, 0.81;p = 0.01),吞咽困难筛查aOR为0.30 (95% CI 0.15, 0.61;p = 0.001),出院时抗血小板比为0.17 (95% CI 0.08, 0.35;p < 0.001),降脂治疗的or为0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.82;p = 0.01),卒中教育aOR为0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.05;p < 0.001),康复率为0.08 (95% CI 0.04, 0.16;p < 0.001)。该模型具有良好的识别性能(AUC = 0.94)和校准性能(HL, X2 p = 0.63)。结论:该研究建立了一个有效的预后模型,可以很好地预测首次急性缺血性卒中后的死亡率,在急性卒中护理决策中具有潜在的临床应用价值。这些预测因子对于创建风险计算器和帮助医疗保健提供者和患者在卒中治疗过程中做出明智的临床决策是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishment of Age-Specific Reference Intervals for 16 Coagulation Parameters in Chinese Children Using Sysmex CN-6000 Analyzer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Golf-Related Injuries in Adolescent Golfers: A Scoping Review. Hypertension as a Predictor of Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Primary Barbed Suture Versus T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Infection Prevention Among Healthcare Professionals and Their Predictors at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1