Reference Ranges of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain by Contemporary Vendor-Neutral Echocardiography Software in Healthy Subjects

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/echo.70102
Aro Daniela Arockiam, Tiffany Dong, Ankit Agrawal, Joseph El Dahdah, Elio Haroun, Muhammad Majid, Sharmeen Sorathia, Richard A. Grimm, Patrick Collier, Leonardo Rodriguez, Zoran B. Popovic, Brian P. Griffin, Tom Kai Ming Wang
{"title":"Reference Ranges of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain by Contemporary Vendor-Neutral Echocardiography Software in Healthy Subjects","authors":"Aro Daniela Arockiam,&nbsp;Tiffany Dong,&nbsp;Ankit Agrawal,&nbsp;Joseph El Dahdah,&nbsp;Elio Haroun,&nbsp;Muhammad Majid,&nbsp;Sharmeen Sorathia,&nbsp;Richard A. Grimm,&nbsp;Patrick Collier,&nbsp;Leonardo Rodriguez,&nbsp;Zoran B. Popovic,&nbsp;Brian P. Griffin,&nbsp;Tom Kai Ming Wang","doi":"10.1111/echo.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) by speckle-tracking transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an established measure of left ventricular systolic function with many clinical applications. Strain software has evolved to achieve vendor-neutrality in recent developments, although there is a notable absence of external validation studies. We assessed the normal ranges and associated factors of two-dimensional LVGLS quantification by TomTec, EchoPAC, VVI, and Epsilon contemporary strain software in a healthy cross-sectional cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred healthy subjects undergoing TTE during January–April 2023 at our institution were cross-sectionally recruited, 20 per age-group, 50% were female, and 50% had GE and 50% Philips scans. TomTec version 51.02 (Autostrain LV), EchoPAC version 206 (AFI-LV), VVI version (V.2.00-070730), and Epsilon (5.0.2.11295) were utilized to quantify two-dimensional LVGLS in all patients for comparative and regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Means and lower limits of normal (95% confidence intervals) of LVGLS were −17.1% (−17.5%, −16.7%) and −14.7% (−15.4%, −14.0%) for TomTec; −17.8% (−18.4%, −17.2%) and −14.4% (−15.3%, −13.5%) for EchoPAC; −16.3% (−16.9%, −15.7%) and −13.0% (−13.9%, −12.1%) for VVI; and −17.0% (−17.6%, −16.4%) and −12.8% (−13.8%, −11.8%) for Epsilon. Factors significantly associated with LVGLS measurements in multivariable regression analyses with their beta-coefficients (95% CI) were female −1.36 (−2.12, −0.59), heart rate (per 10 bpm) with a coefficient of 0.38 (0.10–0.66), left ventricular ejection fraction (per 10%) −1.03 (−1.72, −0.34), and EchoPAC (vs. TomTec) −0.62 (−1.2, 0.0), VVI (vs. TomTec) 0.82 (0.23, 1.41) and Epsilon (vs. TomTec) 0.13 (−0.45, 0.72).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LVGLS measurements were feasible across all four strain software on both GE and Philips scans in this study. Reference ranges to define normal, abnormal, and borderline LVGLS values along with associated factors in healthy patients are reported to enable clinical applications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/echo.70102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) by speckle-tracking transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an established measure of left ventricular systolic function with many clinical applications. Strain software has evolved to achieve vendor-neutrality in recent developments, although there is a notable absence of external validation studies. We assessed the normal ranges and associated factors of two-dimensional LVGLS quantification by TomTec, EchoPAC, VVI, and Epsilon contemporary strain software in a healthy cross-sectional cohort.

Methods

One hundred healthy subjects undergoing TTE during January–April 2023 at our institution were cross-sectionally recruited, 20 per age-group, 50% were female, and 50% had GE and 50% Philips scans. TomTec version 51.02 (Autostrain LV), EchoPAC version 206 (AFI-LV), VVI version (V.2.00-070730), and Epsilon (5.0.2.11295) were utilized to quantify two-dimensional LVGLS in all patients for comparative and regression analyses.

Results

Means and lower limits of normal (95% confidence intervals) of LVGLS were −17.1% (−17.5%, −16.7%) and −14.7% (−15.4%, −14.0%) for TomTec; −17.8% (−18.4%, −17.2%) and −14.4% (−15.3%, −13.5%) for EchoPAC; −16.3% (−16.9%, −15.7%) and −13.0% (−13.9%, −12.1%) for VVI; and −17.0% (−17.6%, −16.4%) and −12.8% (−13.8%, −11.8%) for Epsilon. Factors significantly associated with LVGLS measurements in multivariable regression analyses with their beta-coefficients (95% CI) were female −1.36 (−2.12, −0.59), heart rate (per 10 bpm) with a coefficient of 0.38 (0.10–0.66), left ventricular ejection fraction (per 10%) −1.03 (−1.72, −0.34), and EchoPAC (vs. TomTec) −0.62 (−1.2, 0.0), VVI (vs. TomTec) 0.82 (0.23, 1.41) and Epsilon (vs. TomTec) 0.13 (−0.45, 0.72).

Conclusion

LVGLS measurements were feasible across all four strain software on both GE and Philips scans in this study. Reference ranges to define normal, abnormal, and borderline LVGLS values along with associated factors in healthy patients are reported to enable clinical applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代供应商中立超声心动图软件对健康人左心室整体纵向应变的参考范围
背景斑点跟踪经胸超声心动图(TTE)测量左心室整体纵向应变(LVGLS)是一种确定的左心室收缩功能的测量方法,具有许多临床应用。在最近的发展中,应变软件已经发展到实现供应商中立,尽管明显缺乏外部验证研究。我们通过TomTec、EchoPAC、VVI和Epsilon当代菌株软件在健康横断面队列中评估二维LVGLS定量的正常范围和相关因素。方法横断面招募2013年1 - 4月在我院接受TTE检查的健康受试者100例,每个年龄组20例,其中女性50%,GE扫描和Philips扫描各占50%。采用TomTec 51.02版本(Autostrain LV)、EchoPAC 206版本(af -LV)、VVI版本(V.2.00-070730)和Epsilon版本(5.0.2.11295)对所有患者的二维LVGLS进行量化比较和回归分析。结果TomTec的LVGLS正常(95%置信区间)均值和下限分别为- 17.1%(- 17.5%,- 16.7%)和- 14.7% (- 15.4%,- 14.0%);−17.8%(−18.4%,−17.2%)和−14.4% EchoPAC(−15.3%,−13.5%);−16.3%(−16.9%,−15.7%)和−13.0% VVI(−13.9%,−12.1%);(−17.6%,−−17.0% 16.4%)和−12.8%(−13.8%,−11.8%)ε。在多变量回归分析中,与LVGLS测量结果显著相关的因素及其β系数(95% CI)为女性- 1.36(- 2.12,- 0.59),心率(每10 bpm)系数为0.38(0.10-0.66),左心室射血分数(每10%)- 1.03 (- 1.72,- 0.34),EchoPAC (vs. TomTec) - 0.62 (- 1.2, 0.0), VVI (vs. TomTec) 0.82(0.23, 1.41)和Epsilon (vs. TomTec) 0.13(- 0.45, 0.72)。结论LVGLS测量在GE和Philips扫描的所有四种应变软件上都是可行的。在健康患者中定义正常、异常和临界LVGLS值的参考范围以及相关因素被报道,以使临床应用成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Layer-Specific Longitudinal Strain for Identification of the Culprit Vessel in Elderly Patients With NSTE-ACS. A Double-Chambered Left Ventricle Mimicking a Left Ventricular Aneurysm. Colchicine-Treated Familial Mediterranean Fever Patients Are Associated With a Lower Prevalence of Mitral Annular Calcification. Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Correlation With Stroke: A Narrative and Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Evaluation Review. Echocardiographic Strain Analysis Compared With Assessment of Fibrosis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation of Chagas Cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1