The association between inflammatory indices in early pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese population.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07238-3
Jingbo Qiu, Rui Song, Lei Chen, Dongjian Yang, Weiwei Cheng, Wei Zhu
{"title":"The association between inflammatory indices in early pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese population.","authors":"Jingbo Qiu, Rui Song, Lei Chen, Dongjian Yang, Weiwei Cheng, Wei Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07238-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between inflammatory indices from peripheral blood cell in early pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving the medical data of 15,807 pregnant women who gave birth in 2019. Data were collected from the medical records and analyzed. The pregnant women's age, educational level, pre-pregnancy body weight, height, parity, family history of diabetes, lipid profile, blood pressure were recorded during 11 ~ 13<sup>+ 6</sup> pregnancy weeks. We collected and measured several easily accessible systemic inflammatory indices from peripheral blood cell count, including Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, MHR (monocyte count/HDL-C), SII (platelet count ×neutrophil count/lymphocyte count ) and SIRI (neutrophil count ×monocyte count/lymphocyte count), and we analyzed their association with the risk of developing GDM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the present study, a total of 15,807 women were included, including 2,355 (14.9%) women diagnosed with GDM. Women who were diagnosed with GDM showed markedly lower level of monocyte count and higher level of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. The GDM group showed relatively lower level of SIRI, while no significant differences were found between GDM group and non-GDM group in MHR or SII. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we observed a significant association between monocyte counts, MHR and the risk of developing GDM, and the risk tended to decrease with increasing levels of monocyte counts and MHR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed that in early pregnancy, monocyte count and MHR have great potential as early diagnostic markers of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07238-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between inflammatory indices from peripheral blood cell in early pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is unclear.

Methods: This was a retrospective study involving the medical data of 15,807 pregnant women who gave birth in 2019. Data were collected from the medical records and analyzed. The pregnant women's age, educational level, pre-pregnancy body weight, height, parity, family history of diabetes, lipid profile, blood pressure were recorded during 11 ~ 13+ 6 pregnancy weeks. We collected and measured several easily accessible systemic inflammatory indices from peripheral blood cell count, including Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, MHR (monocyte count/HDL-C), SII (platelet count ×neutrophil count/lymphocyte count ) and SIRI (neutrophil count ×monocyte count/lymphocyte count), and we analyzed their association with the risk of developing GDM.

Results: In the present study, a total of 15,807 women were included, including 2,355 (14.9%) women diagnosed with GDM. Women who were diagnosed with GDM showed markedly lower level of monocyte count and higher level of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. The GDM group showed relatively lower level of SIRI, while no significant differences were found between GDM group and non-GDM group in MHR or SII. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we observed a significant association between monocyte counts, MHR and the risk of developing GDM, and the risk tended to decrease with increasing levels of monocyte counts and MHR.

Conclusion: The present study revealed that in early pregnancy, monocyte count and MHR have great potential as early diagnostic markers of GDM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Temporal trends and associated factors in cesarean section use in the Philippines: an analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data from 1993 to 2017. Universal screening for hyperglycemia in early pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A pathway study of factors influencing anxiety in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Commentary: Antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis in late preterms- short- and long-term effects and many open questions. Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1