A Narrative, Qualitative Research Study of CRNA Perspectives of Practice Within the Anesthesia Care Team Model.

Q3 Medicine AANA journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027
Cindi Dabney, Michael Carter, Michael Herr, Todd Monroe, James Moore, Nina Sublette
{"title":"A Narrative, Qualitative Research Study of CRNA Perspectives of Practice Within the Anesthesia Care Team Model.","authors":"Cindi Dabney, Michael Carter, Michael Herr, Todd Monroe, James Moore, Nina Sublette","doi":"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research focused on the perspectives of certified registered nurse anesthetists on practice within the anesthesia care team (ACT) model. This narrative, qualitative study examined participants' perspectives on the strengths, challenges, conflict resolutions, and any other information they provided about working in the ACT model. The participants drew sharp distinctions between the supervision requirement of the ACT and that of collaboration with a team approach. The participants reported that they enjoyed and supported collaboration and found that the team approach led to efficient patient care while having extra hands to help and minds to problem-solve complicated patient scenarios. They did not believe physician supervision over their practice was necessary and proved burdensome. They further reported that they often relied on collaboration, accommodation, or compromise to resolve decision-making conflicts when they practiced within the ACT. However, several reported avoiding or leaving the ACT care model for independent practice. Participants who left ACTs reported that they were much happier with their profession and would never return to the ACT model. The recommendations from this study include discontinuing supervision of their practice while strengthening collaboration, a change in payment structure for anesthesia services, and reformed hospital credentialing. They believe that these recommendations would facilitate the full scope of practice and work independently to deliver the high-quality anesthesia care they trained for.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"93 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focused on the perspectives of certified registered nurse anesthetists on practice within the anesthesia care team (ACT) model. This narrative, qualitative study examined participants' perspectives on the strengths, challenges, conflict resolutions, and any other information they provided about working in the ACT model. The participants drew sharp distinctions between the supervision requirement of the ACT and that of collaboration with a team approach. The participants reported that they enjoyed and supported collaboration and found that the team approach led to efficient patient care while having extra hands to help and minds to problem-solve complicated patient scenarios. They did not believe physician supervision over their practice was necessary and proved burdensome. They further reported that they often relied on collaboration, accommodation, or compromise to resolve decision-making conflicts when they practiced within the ACT. However, several reported avoiding or leaving the ACT care model for independent practice. Participants who left ACTs reported that they were much happier with their profession and would never return to the ACT model. The recommendations from this study include discontinuing supervision of their practice while strengthening collaboration, a change in payment structure for anesthesia services, and reformed hospital credentialing. They believe that these recommendations would facilitate the full scope of practice and work independently to deliver the high-quality anesthesia care they trained for.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
期刊最新文献
Calendar of Events. Critical Events in Patients With Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood: A Cohort Study Subgroup Analysis. Exploring Safety Culture, Production Pressure, Occupational Burnout, and Patient Safety in Anesthesia. Prevention and Management of Hypoxemia During Anesthesia Induction In the Neonate and Small Infant. Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Burnout Among Anesthesia Providers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1