Changes in Contraceptive Services During Utah's Family Planning Elevated Contraceptive Access Initiative: A Prospective Assessment of Intervention and Control Sites.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of public health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917
Rebecca G Simmons, Alexandra Gero, Gentry Carter, Jessica N Sanders, Caitlin Quade, Jami Baayd, Madeline Mullholand, Sarah Elliott, Kyl Myers, Erica Torres, Justin D Smith, David K Turok
{"title":"Changes in Contraceptive Services During Utah's Family Planning Elevated Contraceptive Access Initiative: A Prospective Assessment of Intervention and Control Sites.","authors":"Rebecca G Simmons, Alexandra Gero, Gentry Carter, Jessica N Sanders, Caitlin Quade, Jami Baayd, Madeline Mullholand, Sarah Elliott, Kyl Myers, Erica Torres, Justin D Smith, David K Turok","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To assess contraceptive service changes during the Family Planning Elevated (FPE) Contraceptive Access Program in Utah clinics from 2018 to 2023. <b>Methods.</b> We assessed de-identified electronic health record data on female clients aged 18 to 50 years from intervention and matched control sites. We used comparative interrupted time series analyses comparing total number of contraceptive services and their proportion relative to visits between intervention and control sites before, during, and after FPE. <b>Results.</b> Intervention sites provided on average 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17, 2.66) times as many contraceptive services per month as controls during the 24-month intervention period, with no significant decreases in services noted in the postintervention period. The proportions of total visits related to family planning decreased by a factor of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.52, 0.94) during the intervention period. However, this effect was mitigated at intervention sites where proportions of contraceptive services were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.97, 2.14) times greater than control sites and did not significantly decrease after the intervention. <b>Conclusions.</b> Contraceptive access initiatives have capacity to make meaningful change in communities where they are employed, even after they end. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2025;115(3):387-396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"115 3","pages":"387-396"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To assess contraceptive service changes during the Family Planning Elevated (FPE) Contraceptive Access Program in Utah clinics from 2018 to 2023. Methods. We assessed de-identified electronic health record data on female clients aged 18 to 50 years from intervention and matched control sites. We used comparative interrupted time series analyses comparing total number of contraceptive services and their proportion relative to visits between intervention and control sites before, during, and after FPE. Results. Intervention sites provided on average 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17, 2.66) times as many contraceptive services per month as controls during the 24-month intervention period, with no significant decreases in services noted in the postintervention period. The proportions of total visits related to family planning decreased by a factor of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.52, 0.94) during the intervention period. However, this effect was mitigated at intervention sites where proportions of contraceptive services were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.97, 2.14) times greater than control sites and did not significantly decrease after the intervention. Conclusions. Contraceptive access initiatives have capacity to make meaningful change in communities where they are employed, even after they end. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(3):387-396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹他州计划生育期间避孕服务的变化提高避孕途径倡议:干预和控制地点的前瞻性评估。
目标。评估2018年至2023年犹他州诊所计划生育高等级(FPE)避孕可及项目期间避孕服务的变化。方法。我们评估了来自干预和匹配对照站点的18至50岁女性客户的去识别电子健康记录数据。我们使用了比较中断时间序列分析,比较了避孕服务的总数及其相对于FPE之前、期间和之后干预点和对照点之间的访问量的比例。结果。在24个月的干预期间,干预点每月提供的避孕服务平均是对照组的1.76倍(95%可信区间[CI] = 1.17, 2.66),干预后的服务没有明显减少。在干预期间,与计划生育相关的总就诊比例下降了0.70倍(95% CI = 0.52, 0.94)。然而,在避孕服务比例为对照组的1.44倍(95% CI = 0.97, 2.14)的干预点,这种影响有所缓解,并且在干预后没有显著降低。结论。避孕药具获取倡议有能力在其受雇的社区产生有意义的变化,即使在行动结束后也是如此。[J] .公共卫生杂志,2015;15(3):387-396。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Disparities From Climate Change: The Role of Housing Insecurity and LGBTQ+ Identity, California, 2023. The Effects of Street Cleaning on Serious Crime and Gun Violence in Philadelphia, 2023-2024: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Homicides of Adult Women and the Role of Intimate Partner Violence: United States, 2018-2022. Swope et al. Respond. A Three-Year Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Patterns Among Homebound Older Adults: Implications for Future Preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1