Health inequality and improvement gap in the prevalence of gynecological cancers among perimenopausal women globally, 1990-2019.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21807-3
Chenglin Yang, Jianqin Zou, Xiaochen Luo, Yangjiang Ou, Xiaoru Lin, Xinyu Wang, Qing Guan, Fanxiang Zeng, Dong Liang, Xiuquan Lin
{"title":"Health inequality and improvement gap in the prevalence of gynecological cancers among perimenopausal women globally, 1990-2019.","authors":"Chenglin Yang, Jianqin Zou, Xiaochen Luo, Yangjiang Ou, Xiaoru Lin, Xinyu Wang, Qing Guan, Fanxiang Zeng, Dong Liang, Xiuquan Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21807-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perimenopausal women are a high-risk group for gynecological cancers; however, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in prevalence and its association with socioeconomic development have not been fully explored. This study aimed to analyze the global burden of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers among perimenopausal women, examine health inequalities, and investigate their relationship with socioeconomic levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the disease burden of gynecological cancers in perimenopausal women using the 2019 Global Burden of Disease study (GBD2019) data, utilizing prevalence and Years of Life Lost (YLL) rates. Health inequality and frontier analyses were performed based on age-standardized prevalence rates for cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers, coupled with associated socio-demographic index (SDI) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past thirty years, global prevalence rates of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers among perimenopausal women have risen, while the number of YLLs has declined. Correlation analysis with the SDI showed that ovarian and uterine cancer prevalence rates positively correlated with SDI, whereas cervical cancer prevalence was inversely related to it. Moreover, the burden of these cancers demonstrated marked inequalities in relation to SDI, with cervical cancer disparities intensifying-the absolute value of the inequality slope index rose from 100.98 in 1990 to 170.17 in 2019. Ovarian cancer experienced a slight decrease in inequalities, while uterine cancer saw a significant increase, with its inequality slope index jumping from 176.51 in 1990 to 226.01 in 2019. Additionally, there existed regional health disparities in the disease burden of ovarian cancer among perimenopausal women; notably, in regions where YLLs rates for ovarian cancer were increasing, economically developed areas actually exhibited a decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Globally, the prevalence of gynecological cancers in perimenopausal women showed an increasing trend. The health inequality gap for cervical and uterine cancer has widened, while disparities in ovarian cancer are particularly pronounced across regions. There remains scope for improvement in managing the prevalence of gynecological cancers among perimenopausal women across countries with varying SDI levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21807-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perimenopausal women are a high-risk group for gynecological cancers; however, the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in prevalence and its association with socioeconomic development have not been fully explored. This study aimed to analyze the global burden of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers among perimenopausal women, examine health inequalities, and investigate their relationship with socioeconomic levels.

Methods: We assessed the disease burden of gynecological cancers in perimenopausal women using the 2019 Global Burden of Disease study (GBD2019) data, utilizing prevalence and Years of Life Lost (YLL) rates. Health inequality and frontier analyses were performed based on age-standardized prevalence rates for cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers, coupled with associated socio-demographic index (SDI) data.

Results: Over the past thirty years, global prevalence rates of cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers among perimenopausal women have risen, while the number of YLLs has declined. Correlation analysis with the SDI showed that ovarian and uterine cancer prevalence rates positively correlated with SDI, whereas cervical cancer prevalence was inversely related to it. Moreover, the burden of these cancers demonstrated marked inequalities in relation to SDI, with cervical cancer disparities intensifying-the absolute value of the inequality slope index rose from 100.98 in 1990 to 170.17 in 2019. Ovarian cancer experienced a slight decrease in inequalities, while uterine cancer saw a significant increase, with its inequality slope index jumping from 176.51 in 1990 to 226.01 in 2019. Additionally, there existed regional health disparities in the disease burden of ovarian cancer among perimenopausal women; notably, in regions where YLLs rates for ovarian cancer were increasing, economically developed areas actually exhibited a decline.

Conclusion: Globally, the prevalence of gynecological cancers in perimenopausal women showed an increasing trend. The health inequality gap for cervical and uterine cancer has widened, while disparities in ovarian cancer are particularly pronounced across regions. There remains scope for improvement in managing the prevalence of gynecological cancers among perimenopausal women across countries with varying SDI levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1990-2019年全球围绝经期妇女妇科癌症患病率的健康不平等和改善差距
背景:围绝经期妇女是妇科癌症的高危人群;然而,其时空异质性及其与社会经济发展的关系尚未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在分析围绝经期妇女宫颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌的全球负担,检查健康不平等,并调查其与社会经济水平的关系。方法:我们使用2019年全球疾病负担研究(GBD2019)数据,利用患病率和生命损失年数(YLL)率,评估围绝经期妇女妇科癌症的疾病负担。健康不平等和前沿分析基于宫颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌的年龄标准化患病率,并结合相关的社会人口指数(SDI)数据。结果:在过去的30年里,全球围绝经期妇女宫颈癌、卵巢癌和子宫癌的患病率有所上升,而yll的数量有所下降。与SDI的相关分析显示,卵巢癌和子宫癌患病率与SDI呈正相关,宫颈癌患病率与SDI呈负相关。此外,这些癌症的负担与SDI之间存在明显的不平等,其中宫颈癌的差异加剧——不平等斜率指数绝对值从1990年的100.98上升到2019年的170.17。卵巢癌的不平等程度略有下降,而子宫癌的不平等程度斜率指数明显上升,从1990年的176.51上升到2019年的226.01。此外,围绝经期妇女的卵巢癌疾病负担存在地区健康差异;值得注意的是,在卵巢癌的YLLs率上升的地区,经济发达地区实际上呈现下降趋势。结论:在全球范围内,围绝经期妇女妇科肿瘤患病率呈上升趋势。宫颈癌和子宫癌方面的健康不平等差距扩大了,而卵巢癌方面的差异在各区域之间尤为明显。在不同SDI水平的国家,在管理围绝经期妇女的妇科癌症患病率方面仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Associations of self-reported smoking status, serum cotinine level and a composite indicator of smoke exposure with depressive symptoms in middle-aged and elderly U.S. individuals: a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2018. The association between cultural connectedness and health-related quality of life among Indigenous peoples in the CANZUS countries: a systematic review. Gender-responsive and -transformative interventions in HIV, TB and malaria programmes: a review of evidence. Exploring the underlying mechanism of the relation between trait mindfulness and insomnia among university students: a dual processing perspective. Heat stress in relation to sleep health among farmers: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1