Status and comparison of HIV Knowledge, HIV Testing and other healthy behavior between men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a cross-sectional study in Zhejiang Province, China.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21860-y
Zhongrong Yang, Lin Chen, Wanjun Chen, Lin He, Chengliang Chai
{"title":"Status and comparison of HIV Knowledge, HIV Testing and other healthy behavior between men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a cross-sectional study in Zhejiang Province, China.","authors":"Zhongrong Yang, Lin Chen, Wanjun Chen, Lin He, Chengliang Chai","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21860-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to explore the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status of and compare HIV knowledge, HIV testing, and other healthy behaviors between men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and men who have sex with men only (MSMO), to provide a scientific basis for targeted HIV interventions for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect demographic and behavioral information using questionnaires for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,993 participants, 772 (38.7%) reported having sexual intercourse with women. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model analysis indicated that MSMW had a lower probability than MSMO of reporting HIV knowledge 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:0.556, 95% CI: 0.409-0.756), knowledge 2 (aOR:0.626; 95% CI, 0.515-0.761), knowledge 3 (aOR:0.569; 95% CI: 0.447-0.724), informing their HIV status to the last casual sex partners offline (aOR: 0.515, 95% CI: 0.358-0.743), HIV testing more than once in the past 6 months (aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931), and HIV testing in a hospital in the past 6 months (aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931). In contrast, MSMW had a higher probability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) intake in the past 6 months (aOR: 2.252, 95% CI: 1.570-3.229), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) intake in the past 6 months (aOR: 1.630, 95% CI: 1.091-2.434), and cumulative HIV testing more than twice (aOR: 1.917, 95% CI: 1.434-2.563).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSMW showed significant differences with MSMO in HIV knowledge and HIV related risky reduction behaviors. It is necessary to enhance awareness and skills on HIV self-testing, PEP, and PrEP among MSM. Encouraging HIV knowledge education and HIV testing service are important for MSMW. PEP and PrEP might be enhanced among MSMO for reducing the risk of HIV transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21860-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to explore the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status of and compare HIV knowledge, HIV testing, and other healthy behaviors between men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and men who have sex with men only (MSMO), to provide a scientific basis for targeted HIV interventions for this population.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect demographic and behavioral information using questionnaires for statistical analysis.

Results: Among 1,993 participants, 772 (38.7%) reported having sexual intercourse with women. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model analysis indicated that MSMW had a lower probability than MSMO of reporting HIV knowledge 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:0.556, 95% CI: 0.409-0.756), knowledge 2 (aOR:0.626; 95% CI, 0.515-0.761), knowledge 3 (aOR:0.569; 95% CI: 0.447-0.724), informing their HIV status to the last casual sex partners offline (aOR: 0.515, 95% CI: 0.358-0.743), HIV testing more than once in the past 6 months (aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931), and HIV testing in a hospital in the past 6 months (aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931). In contrast, MSMW had a higher probability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) intake in the past 6 months (aOR: 2.252, 95% CI: 1.570-3.229), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) intake in the past 6 months (aOR: 1.630, 95% CI: 1.091-2.434), and cumulative HIV testing more than twice (aOR: 1.917, 95% CI: 1.434-2.563).

Conclusion: MSMW showed significant differences with MSMO in HIV knowledge and HIV related risky reduction behaviors. It is necessary to enhance awareness and skills on HIV self-testing, PEP, and PrEP among MSM. Encouraging HIV knowledge education and HIV testing service are important for MSMW. PEP and PrEP might be enhanced among MSMO for reducing the risk of HIV transmission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浙江省男男性行为者(MSMO)与男女性行为者(MSMW) HIV知识、HIV检测及其他健康行为的现状及比较:一项横断面研究
目的:探讨男男女性行为人群(MSMW)与男男性行为人群(MSMO)人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染状况,并对其HIV知识、HIV检测及其他健康行为进行比较,为针对这一人群开展针对性的HIV干预提供科学依据。方法:采用横断面调查法收集人口学和行为信息,采用问卷进行统计分析。结果:在1993名参与者中,772名(38.7%)报告与女性发生过性行为。多因素logistic回归模型分析结果显示,MSMW报告HIV知识1的概率低于MSMO(调整优势比[aOR]:0.556, 95% CI: 0.409-0.756),知识2 (aOR:0.626;95% CI, 0.515-0.761),知识3 (aOR:0.569;95% CI: 0.447-0.724),向最后的偶发性性伴侣告知其艾滋病毒状况(aOR: 0.515, 95% CI: 0.358-0.743),过去6个月内多次进行艾滋病毒检测(aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931),以及过去6个月内在医院进行艾滋病毒检测(aOR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.521-0.931)。相比之下,MSMW在过去6个月内摄入暴露后预防(PEP) (aOR: 2.252, 95% CI: 1.570-3.229)、暴露前预防(PrEP) (aOR: 1.630, 95% CI: 1.091-2.434)和累计HIV检测超过两次(aOR: 1.917, 95% CI: 1.434-2.563)的概率更高。结论:MSMW与MSMO在HIV知识和HIV相关风险降低行为方面存在显著差异。有必要提高男男性行为者艾滋病毒自检、PEP和PrEP的意识和技能。鼓励艾滋病毒知识教育和艾滋病毒检测服务对MSMW很重要。PEP和PrEP可以在MSMO中加强,以降低艾滋病毒传播的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal trends, demographic disparities, and predictions to 2040 in gastrointestinal cancer mortality in the United States. Retention in HIV care before and after implementation of a case management program in Malawi. Temporal patterns in mortality from type 2 diabetes and digestive system cancers-an epidemiological analysis of the US population from 1999 to 2023. Community health worker-supported oral health promotion in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of roles, interventions, and outcomes. Occupational sedentary behaviour and mental health symptoms among software and IT workers in China: a cross-sectional study using path analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1