A comparison of international clinical practice guidelines for postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07246-3
Sarah Ephraums, Amrita Dasgupta, Soumya Korah, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Sean Seeho
{"title":"A comparison of international clinical practice guidelines for postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.","authors":"Sarah Ephraums, Amrita Dasgupta, Soumya Korah, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Sean Seeho","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07246-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. The postpartum period is a time of particularly increased risk. International guidelines provide recommendations for when a woman should be offered thromboembolism prophylaxis, however they differ greatly in their criteria as to which women qualify for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aim of this study was to determine the most common risk factors for women being recommended LMWH and compare the proportion of women who would qualify for postpartum LMWH according to four international guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluated rates of postpartum LMWH prophylaxis by applying guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ). Demographic, medical and obstetric risk factors for venous thromboembolism were identified for individual women from one regional and two tertiary maternity hospitals in New South Wales, Australia between February and October 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 338 women were included in the analyses. By applying RCOG guidelines, 53.6% of women would have qualified for postpartum LMWH compared with 40.2% of women using SOMANZ guidelines, 37.3% using SOGC guidelines, and 8.3% using ACCP guidelines. The most common risk factors were caesarean birth, maternal age greater than 35 years, body mass index above 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and instrumental birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are considerable differences in the rates of women receiving postpartum pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis when recommendations from different international guidelines are applied. These differences reflect the wide variation in guideline recommendations for the use of LMWH following birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07246-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. The postpartum period is a time of particularly increased risk. International guidelines provide recommendations for when a woman should be offered thromboembolism prophylaxis, however they differ greatly in their criteria as to which women qualify for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aim of this study was to determine the most common risk factors for women being recommended LMWH and compare the proportion of women who would qualify for postpartum LMWH according to four international guidelines.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated rates of postpartum LMWH prophylaxis by applying guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ). Demographic, medical and obstetric risk factors for venous thromboembolism were identified for individual women from one regional and two tertiary maternity hospitals in New South Wales, Australia between February and October 2022.

Results: A total of 338 women were included in the analyses. By applying RCOG guidelines, 53.6% of women would have qualified for postpartum LMWH compared with 40.2% of women using SOMANZ guidelines, 37.3% using SOGC guidelines, and 8.3% using ACCP guidelines. The most common risk factors were caesarean birth, maternal age greater than 35 years, body mass index above 30 kg/m2 and instrumental birth.

Conclusions: There are considerable differences in the rates of women receiving postpartum pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis when recommendations from different international guidelines are applied. These differences reflect the wide variation in guideline recommendations for the use of LMWH following birth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后静脉血栓栓塞预防国际临床实践指南的比较。
背景:静脉血栓栓塞是全世界孕产妇死亡的主要原因。产后时期是风险特别增加的时期。国际指南对妇女何时应接受血栓栓塞预防提供了建议,但是对于哪些妇女有资格接受低分子肝素(LMWH)治疗的标准存在很大差异。本研究的目的是确定推荐低分子肝素的妇女最常见的危险因素,并根据四项国际指南比较符合产后低分子肝素资格的妇女比例。材料和方法:本横断面研究通过应用美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)、皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)、加拿大妇产科医师学会(SOGC)和澳大利亚和新西兰产科医学学会(SOMANZ)的指南建议评估产后低分子肝素预防率。在2022年2月至10月期间,对澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家地区和两家三级妇产医院的个别妇女确定了静脉血栓栓塞的人口、医疗和产科风险因素。结果:共有338名妇女被纳入分析。通过应用RCOG指南,53.6%的妇女符合产后低分子肝素的标准,而使用SOMANZ指南的妇女为40.2%,使用SOGC指南的妇女为37.3%,使用ACCP指南的妇女为8.3%。最常见的危险因素是剖腹产、产妇年龄大于35岁、体重指数大于30 kg/m2和器械分娩。结论:当应用不同国际指南的建议时,接受产后静脉血栓栓塞药物预防的妇女比例存在相当大的差异。这些差异反映了出生后使用低分子肝素的指南建议的广泛差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Community Midwifery Care (CMC) on maternal and neonatal wellbeing in postnatal period: a qualitative study. Risk of adverse maternal outcomes among pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus in Ontario, Canada, 2012-2020: a retrospective cohort study. Perinatal outcomes of pregnant adolescents in rural Japan: a retrospective cohort study at a comprehensive perinatal center. Determinants of low birth weight in term singleton neonate delivered at public health facilities in Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia, an institution-based case-control study. Development of machine learning models for early prediction of small for-gestational-age births using maternal sociodemographic and obstetric data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1