A comparison of short- and long-term prognoses between cases with and without antenatal corticosteroid administration in late preterm delivery: a nationwide population-based study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06851-y
Geum Joon Cho, Chan-Wook Park, Kyu-Dong Cho, Sungyeon Ha, Suk-Joo Choi, Min-Jeong Oh
{"title":"A comparison of short- and long-term prognoses between cases with and without antenatal corticosteroid administration in late preterm delivery: a nationwide population-based study.","authors":"Geum Joon Cho, Chan-Wook Park, Kyu-Dong Cho, Sungyeon Ha, Suk-Joo Choi, Min-Jeong Oh","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06851-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of information concerning the short- and long-term benefits and harm of antenatal corticosteroid administration and of expanded corticosteroid administration with dexamethasone in the late preterm period. Thus, we aimed to compare the effect on short-term respiratory complications, hypoglycemia, and long-term neurodevelopmental disorders in neonates born in the late preterm period between cases with and without corticosteroid administration and evaluate the difference in effects according to the type of corticosteroid administered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included all women who had a singleton delivery in the late preterm period between January 2007 and December 2015. We extracted data from Korea National Health Insurance claims and National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children databases. Primary short-term outcomes were in the late preterm period. Concerning short-term effectiveness for respiratory morbidity, dexamethasone administration in the late preterm period was associated with respiratory complications and hypoglycemia in neonates. Long-term outcomes were neurodevelopmental disorders in infants/children observed at follow-up among all neonates until the end of 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 57,963 women who delivered late preterm births during the study period, 1,255 (2.2%) had received antenatal corticosteroid administration in late preterm period. Dexamethasone administration was associated with a decreased risk of transient tachypnea (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.88) compared with no antenatal corticosteroid administration, but this effect was not observed in relation to betamethasone administration (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexamethasone administration in late preterm infants was associated with a decreased risk of transient tachypnea compared with no corticosteroid administration but this effect was not observed with betamethasone administration. However, antenatal corticosteroid administration in the late preterm period did not lower the risk of other respiratory complications nor increase the risk of hypoglycemia, with no effect on neurodevelopment regardless of the type used.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06851-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of information concerning the short- and long-term benefits and harm of antenatal corticosteroid administration and of expanded corticosteroid administration with dexamethasone in the late preterm period. Thus, we aimed to compare the effect on short-term respiratory complications, hypoglycemia, and long-term neurodevelopmental disorders in neonates born in the late preterm period between cases with and without corticosteroid administration and evaluate the difference in effects according to the type of corticosteroid administered.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included all women who had a singleton delivery in the late preterm period between January 2007 and December 2015. We extracted data from Korea National Health Insurance claims and National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children databases. Primary short-term outcomes were in the late preterm period. Concerning short-term effectiveness for respiratory morbidity, dexamethasone administration in the late preterm period was associated with respiratory complications and hypoglycemia in neonates. Long-term outcomes were neurodevelopmental disorders in infants/children observed at follow-up among all neonates until the end of 2018.

Results: Of 57,963 women who delivered late preterm births during the study period, 1,255 (2.2%) had received antenatal corticosteroid administration in late preterm period. Dexamethasone administration was associated with a decreased risk of transient tachypnea (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.88) compared with no antenatal corticosteroid administration, but this effect was not observed in relation to betamethasone administration (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.14).

Conclusions: Dexamethasone administration in late preterm infants was associated with a decreased risk of transient tachypnea compared with no corticosteroid administration but this effect was not observed with betamethasone administration. However, antenatal corticosteroid administration in the late preterm period did not lower the risk of other respiratory complications nor increase the risk of hypoglycemia, with no effect on neurodevelopment regardless of the type used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在晚期早产中给予和未给予皮质类固醇的病例之间的短期和长期预后的比较:一项基于全国人群的研究。
背景:关于产前皮质类固醇给药和在早产后期扩大皮质类固醇给药与地塞米松的短期和长期利弊的信息缺乏。因此,我们的目的是比较使用和不使用皮质类固醇对晚期早产儿短期呼吸系统并发症、低血糖和长期神经发育障碍的影响,并根据使用皮质类固醇的类型评估效果的差异。方法:本回顾性观察队列研究纳入2007年1月至2015年12月期间所有晚期早产的单胎分娩妇女。我们从韩国国民健康保险索赔和国家婴儿和儿童健康筛查计划数据库中提取数据。主要的短期结果出现在早产后期。关于呼吸系统疾病的短期疗效,早产儿晚期给药地塞米松与新生儿呼吸系统并发症和低血糖有关。长期结果是在2018年底之前对所有新生儿进行随访时观察到的婴儿/儿童神经发育障碍。结果:在研究期间,57,963名晚期早产妇女中,1,255名(2.2%)在晚期早产期间接受了产前皮质类固醇治疗。与产前未给予皮质类固醇相比,给予地塞米松与短暂性呼吸急促的风险降低相关(调整优势比[aOR] 0.66, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.50-0.88),但与给予倍他米松无关(aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.14)。结论:与未使用皮质类固醇相比,晚期早产儿使用地塞米松可降低短暂性呼吸急促的风险,但使用倍他米松未观察到这种影响。然而,在早产后期给予皮质类固醇并没有降低其他呼吸系统并发症的风险,也没有增加低血糖的风险,无论使用哪种类型,对神经发育都没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of oral dydrogesterone compared to placebo in reducing the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of eight or more antenatal care visits on intermittent preventive treatment of malaria uptake during pregnancy and facility-based delivery in Ghana: a propensity score matched analysis. Impact of male partner's age on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes stratified by female age: a retrospective study of 1,703 treatment cycles. Predicting failed trial of labor in advanced-age primiparas: development and validation of a clinical nomogram. Comparative machine learning models for early prediction of preterm birth from maternal serum biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1