Person-centred maternity care during childbirth: a systematic review in low and middle-income countries.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-07133-3
Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Abel F Dadi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Tahir A Hassen, Kedir Y Ahmed, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Erkihun Amsalu, Meless G Bore, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Addisu Alehegn Alemu, Animut Alebel Ayalew, Jemal E Shifa, Asres Bedaso, Cheru Tesema Leshargie
{"title":"Person-centred maternity care during childbirth: a systematic review in low and middle-income countries.","authors":"Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Abel F Dadi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Tahir A Hassen, Kedir Y Ahmed, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Erkihun Amsalu, Meless G Bore, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Addisu Alehegn Alemu, Animut Alebel Ayalew, Jemal E Shifa, Asres Bedaso, Cheru Tesema Leshargie","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-07133-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving the quality of intrapartum and immediate postnatal care is critical for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This review aimed to assess the extent of Person-Centred Maternity Care (PCMC) practices during childbirth in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved studies from four databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Maternal and Infant Care, up to 30 May 2023 and updated 26 April 2024. Additionally, manual searching was performed to identify additional studies. Our study included studies that examined PCMC using PCMC scale. The included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for quality appraisal.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twelve articles out of 888 were retained in the review. Among these, nine studies specifically examined various elements of PCMC, such as dignity and respect, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. The lowest and highest levels of the mean (± SD-standard deviation) PCMC were 46.5 (6.9) and 60.2 (12.3) out of 90 total scores in Ghana and urban Kenya, respectively. The lowest score was reported in the communication and autonomy subscale domain of PCMC at a mean (± SD) score of 8.3 (3.3). Women who were wealthier and educated, and those who received ANC and birthing care by the same health care providers were found to have a higher level of PCMC during childbirth. Whereas those women who did not have ANC follow-up, visited health facilities for ANC in the second or third trimester, stayed at health facilities after birth for 2-7 days, had complications, and received care from auxiliary midwives, nurses, or assisted by unskillled attendants were associated with a lower level of PCMC during childbirth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicated that the communication and autonomy components of PCMC are notably low, affecting the rapport between healthcare providers and women, as well as decision-making and the execution of procedures. To enhance PCMC, continuity of care through antenatal and intrapartum care provided by the same healthcare providers, along with fostering a supportive environment for both women and healthcare providers during childbirth is imperative.</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD42023426638.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07133-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of intrapartum and immediate postnatal care is critical for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This review aimed to assess the extent of Person-Centred Maternity Care (PCMC) practices during childbirth in LMICs.

Methods: We retrieved studies from four databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Maternal and Infant Care, up to 30 May 2023 and updated 26 April 2024. Additionally, manual searching was performed to identify additional studies. Our study included studies that examined PCMC using PCMC scale. The included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for quality appraisal.

Findings: Twelve articles out of 888 were retained in the review. Among these, nine studies specifically examined various elements of PCMC, such as dignity and respect, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. The lowest and highest levels of the mean (± SD-standard deviation) PCMC were 46.5 (6.9) and 60.2 (12.3) out of 90 total scores in Ghana and urban Kenya, respectively. The lowest score was reported in the communication and autonomy subscale domain of PCMC at a mean (± SD) score of 8.3 (3.3). Women who were wealthier and educated, and those who received ANC and birthing care by the same health care providers were found to have a higher level of PCMC during childbirth. Whereas those women who did not have ANC follow-up, visited health facilities for ANC in the second or third trimester, stayed at health facilities after birth for 2-7 days, had complications, and received care from auxiliary midwives, nurses, or assisted by unskillled attendants were associated with a lower level of PCMC during childbirth.

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the communication and autonomy components of PCMC are notably low, affecting the rapport between healthcare providers and women, as well as decision-making and the execution of procedures. To enhance PCMC, continuity of care through antenatal and intrapartum care provided by the same healthcare providers, along with fostering a supportive environment for both women and healthcare providers during childbirth is imperative.

Prospero id: CRD42023426638.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩期间以人为本的孕产妇保健:低收入和中等收入国家的系统回顾。
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),提高产时和产后即时护理质量对于降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率至关重要。本综述旨在评估中低收入国家分娩期间以人为本的产妇护理(PCMC)实践的程度。方法:我们从PubMed/Medline、Embase、CINAHL和母婴护理四个数据库中检索研究,截至2023年5月30日,并于2024年4月26日更新。此外,还进行了人工搜索以确定其他研究。我们的研究包括使用PCMC量表检查PCMC的研究。纳入的研究使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)质量评估清单进行评估。结果:888篇文章中有12篇被纳入综述。其中,9项研究专门考察了PCMC的各种要素,如尊严和尊重、沟通和自主以及支持性护理。在加纳和肯尼亚城市,平均(±sd标准差)PCMC的最低和最高水平分别为46.5(6.9)和60.2(12.3)。PCMC的沟通和自主子量表得分最低,平均(±SD)得分为8.3分(3.3分)。研究发现,较富裕和受过教育的妇女,以及在同一医疗保健提供者处接受ANC和分娩护理的妇女,在分娩期间PCMC的水平较高。然而,那些没有接受产前随访、在妊娠中期或晚期到卫生机构就诊、产后在卫生机构停留2-7天、出现并发症、接受辅助助产士、护士护理或由不熟练助产士协助的妇女,分娩期间PCMC水平较低。结论:我们的研究结果表明,PCMC的沟通和自主成分明显较低,影响了医护人员与妇女之间的融洽关系,以及程序的决策和执行。为了加强PCMC,必须通过由同一医疗保健提供者提供的产前和分娩时护理来实现护理的连续性,同时在分娩期间为妇女和医疗保健提供者营造一个支持性的环境。普洛斯彼罗id: CRD42023426638。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for surgical site infections following cesarean section in Ethiopia: umbrella review. Association between maternal HBV-DNA levels and pregnancy outcomes among hepatitis B carriers: a retrospective cohort study in China. Identification of a DICER1 mutation in a preeclamptic patient with ruptured ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor and renal allograft failure under hemodialysis: a case report. Evaluating wearable-supported exercise interventions for reducing postpartum weight: a randomized controlled trial. prevalence of syphilis among pregnant women in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1