{"title":"Excitatory synaptic integration mechanism of three types of granule cells in the dentate gyrus.","authors":"Yue Mao, Ming Liu, Xiaojuan Sun","doi":"10.1007/s11571-025-10226-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Granule cells (GCs) are mainly responsible for receiving and integrating information from the entorhinal cortex and transferring it to the hippocampus to accomplish memory-related functions such as pattern separation. Owing to the heterogeneity of GCs, there are also two other subtypes, namely semilunar granule cells (SGCs) and hilar ectopic granule cells (HEGCs). In order to investigate their differences, here we examine the disparities in dendritic integration among the different subtypes of GCs. By utilizing biological experimental data, we developed detailed multi-compartment models for each type of GC. Our findings reveal that under the excitatory synaptic inputs (mediated by AMPA receptors), the dendritic integration of GCs, SGCs and HEGCs are linear, sublinear, and supralinear respectively. Furthermore, we propose that the sublinear integration observed in SGCs may be attributed to a high density of V-type potassium channels (K <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>V</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> ) distributed in dendrites with smaller volume and higher input resistance; while the supralinear integration seen in HEGCs may be due to a high density of T-type calcium channels (Ca <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>T</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> ) distributed in dendrites with larger volume and lower input resistance. Additionally, sodium channels, six types of potassium channels (K <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>A</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> , K <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>M</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> , sK <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>DR</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> , fK <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>DR</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> , BK, SK), and two types of calcium channels (Ca <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>N</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> , Ca <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mtext>L</mtext> <mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts> </math> ) have minimal influence on their respective integration modes. We also found different integration modes exhibit varied somatic firing rates when subjected to different spatial synaptic activation sets, the HEGCs with the supralinear integration demonstrate higher somatic firing rates than the SGCs with the sublinear integration. These results provide theoretical insights into understanding the distinct roles played by these three subtypes of granule cells in memory-related functions within the dentate gyrus.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10226-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10226-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Granule cells (GCs) are mainly responsible for receiving and integrating information from the entorhinal cortex and transferring it to the hippocampus to accomplish memory-related functions such as pattern separation. Owing to the heterogeneity of GCs, there are also two other subtypes, namely semilunar granule cells (SGCs) and hilar ectopic granule cells (HEGCs). In order to investigate their differences, here we examine the disparities in dendritic integration among the different subtypes of GCs. By utilizing biological experimental data, we developed detailed multi-compartment models for each type of GC. Our findings reveal that under the excitatory synaptic inputs (mediated by AMPA receptors), the dendritic integration of GCs, SGCs and HEGCs are linear, sublinear, and supralinear respectively. Furthermore, we propose that the sublinear integration observed in SGCs may be attributed to a high density of V-type potassium channels (K ) distributed in dendrites with smaller volume and higher input resistance; while the supralinear integration seen in HEGCs may be due to a high density of T-type calcium channels (Ca ) distributed in dendrites with larger volume and lower input resistance. Additionally, sodium channels, six types of potassium channels (K , K , sK , fK , BK, SK), and two types of calcium channels (Ca , Ca ) have minimal influence on their respective integration modes. We also found different integration modes exhibit varied somatic firing rates when subjected to different spatial synaptic activation sets, the HEGCs with the supralinear integration demonstrate higher somatic firing rates than the SGCs with the sublinear integration. These results provide theoretical insights into understanding the distinct roles played by these three subtypes of granule cells in memory-related functions within the dentate gyrus.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10226-0.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.