Comprehensive morphomechanical and wall enhancement analysis of intracranial aneurysms.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11417-3
Sebastian Sanchez, Jacob M Miller, Adam Galloy, Marco Nino, Diego Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Carlos Dier, Andres Gudino, Rodrigo Jaramillo, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"Comprehensive morphomechanical and wall enhancement analysis of intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"Sebastian Sanchez, Jacob M Miller, Adam Galloy, Marco Nino, Diego Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Carlos Dier, Andres Gudino, Rodrigo Jaramillo, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11417-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding the relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE), wall shear stress (WSS), and wall tension (WT) across different brain aneurysm compartments may improve the assessment of rupture risk and vessel wall dynamics. Our comprehensive analysis aimed to evaluate these characteristics across different brain aneurysm compartments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intracranial aneurysms underwent 3-T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). T1-weighted images were obtained before and after administering gadolinium (Gd) contrast. 3D segmentations of the aneurysms were generated using 3D Slicer. AWE was quantified based on the signal intensity of the aneurysm wall on T1+Gd images. Finite element analysis calculated WT, while computational fluid dynamics assessed WSS metrics, including time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), wall shear stress gradient (WSSG), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). AWE, WT, and WSS metrics were compared among aneurysms compartments and aneurysms stratified by size, aspect ratio (AR), and size ratio (SR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AWE was elevated in aneurysms with greater size and AR. WT and OSI were higher in aneurysms with larger sizes and higher AR and SR. Aneurysm necks exhibited higher WT, TAWSS, and WSSG compared to the aneurysm body. Irregular aneurysms displayed lower TAWSS, WSSG, and higher OSI in areas of high AWE. The bleb had the highest AWE and lowest WT and WSSG, while necks showed the lowest AWE and highest WT and WSSG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aneurysm necks typically exhibit high WT and WSS, while the body often shows low WSS. Blebs express elevated AWE alongside diminished WSS and WT which potentially increases rupture risk KEY POINTS: Question Areas of high wall enhancement in irregular aneurysms are characterized by low wall sheer stress and high oscillatory sheer index. Findings High risk structures such as daughter sacs exhibit the highest wall enhancement and lowest wall sheer stress. Clinical relevance Comprehensive morphomechanical and wall enhancement analysis of brain aneurysms have the potential to offer valuable new insights into aneurysm biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"5027-5036"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11417-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding the relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE), wall shear stress (WSS), and wall tension (WT) across different brain aneurysm compartments may improve the assessment of rupture risk and vessel wall dynamics. Our comprehensive analysis aimed to evaluate these characteristics across different brain aneurysm compartments.

Methods: Patients with intracranial aneurysms underwent 3-T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). T1-weighted images were obtained before and after administering gadolinium (Gd) contrast. 3D segmentations of the aneurysms were generated using 3D Slicer. AWE was quantified based on the signal intensity of the aneurysm wall on T1+Gd images. Finite element analysis calculated WT, while computational fluid dynamics assessed WSS metrics, including time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), wall shear stress gradient (WSSG), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). AWE, WT, and WSS metrics were compared among aneurysms compartments and aneurysms stratified by size, aspect ratio (AR), and size ratio (SR).

Results: AWE was elevated in aneurysms with greater size and AR. WT and OSI were higher in aneurysms with larger sizes and higher AR and SR. Aneurysm necks exhibited higher WT, TAWSS, and WSSG compared to the aneurysm body. Irregular aneurysms displayed lower TAWSS, WSSG, and higher OSI in areas of high AWE. The bleb had the highest AWE and lowest WT and WSSG, while necks showed the lowest AWE and highest WT and WSSG.

Conclusion: Aneurysm necks typically exhibit high WT and WSS, while the body often shows low WSS. Blebs express elevated AWE alongside diminished WSS and WT which potentially increases rupture risk KEY POINTS: Question Areas of high wall enhancement in irregular aneurysms are characterized by low wall sheer stress and high oscillatory sheer index. Findings High risk structures such as daughter sacs exhibit the highest wall enhancement and lowest wall sheer stress. Clinical relevance Comprehensive morphomechanical and wall enhancement analysis of brain aneurysms have the potential to offer valuable new insights into aneurysm biology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内动脉瘤形态力学及壁增强综合分析。
导论:了解不同脑动脉瘤室间的动脉瘤壁增强(AWE)、壁面剪切应力(WSS)和壁面张力(WT)之间的关系,可以改善对破裂风险和血管壁动力学的评估。我们的综合分析旨在评估不同脑动脉瘤腔室的这些特征。方法:对颅内动脉瘤患者行3-T高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)。给予钆(Gd)对比前后分别获得t1加权图像。使用3D切片器对动脉瘤进行三维分割。根据T1+Gd图像上动脉瘤壁的信号强度来量化AWE。有限元分析计算WT,而计算流体动力学评估WSS指标,包括时间平均壁面剪切应力(TAWSS)、壁面剪切应力梯度(WSSG)和振荡剪切指数(OSI)。对动脉瘤腔室和按大小、宽高比(AR)和大小比(SR)分层的动脉瘤进行AWE、WT和WSS指标的比较。结果:直径和AR越大的动脉瘤AWE升高,直径越大、AR和sr越高的动脉瘤WT和OSI越高,动脉瘤颈部的WT、TAWSS和WSSG均高于瘤体。不规则动脉瘤在高AWE区域表现为较低的TAWSS、WSSG和较高的OSI。水泡的AWE最高,WT和WSSG最低,颈部的AWE最低,WT和WSSG最高。结论:动脉瘤颈部多表现为高WT、高WSS,而瘤体多表现为低WSS。不规则动脉瘤的高壁增强区以低壁应力和高振荡壁指数为特征。结果:子囊等高危结构的壁增强最大,壁应力最小。脑动脉瘤的形态力学和壁增强综合分析有可能为动脉瘤生物学提供有价值的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for quantification of intrapancreatic fat deposition using phantom and histologic comparators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Negligible impact of perifissural nodules in an AI-first reader workflow from UK lung screening trial. Convolutional neural networks in paediatric fracture detection: pooled evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Between automation and alienation: rethinking AI's role in radiologist well-being. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Potential role of breast MRI to identify patients with high-risk lesions who might avoid surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1