The Impact of Cervical Laminoplasty and Cervical Foraminotomy on Axial Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/21925682251319544
Andrew H Kim, John P Avendano, Marc Greenberg, Chathurangi H Pathiravasan, Richard L Skolasky, Mihir Gupta, Sang Hun Lee
{"title":"The Impact of Cervical Laminoplasty and Cervical Foraminotomy on Axial Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Andrew H Kim, John P Avendano, Marc Greenberg, Chathurangi H Pathiravasan, Richard L Skolasky, Mihir Gupta, Sang Hun Lee","doi":"10.1177/21925682251319544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) focused on axial neck pain following cervical laminoplasty (CL) and foraminotomy (CF) for symptomatic cervical spondylosis to determine whether motion-preserving procedures targeting compressive radiculopathy/myelopathy also provide relief of axial neck pain and to investigate risk factors for persistent postoperative axial neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published from 2014 to 2023 describing pain-related outcomes following CL and CF. Data regarding PROs, reoperation rates, and risk factors for postoperative axial neck pain were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. There were 2499 cases (2129 CL and 370 CF) with mean ages of 63.2 and 59.3 years for CL and CF, respectively. CL patients had improved mean postoperative visual analogue scale and neck disability index (NDI) scores compared to preoperative values, with mean differences of -1.97 (CI -2.52, -1.42; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and -12.27 (CI -15.01, -9.54; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), respectively. CF patients had improved mean postoperative NDI scores compared to preoperative values, with mean difference of -15.15 (CI -23.79, -6.50; <i>P</i> = 0.0064). Presence of anterolisthesis, loss of cervical muscle volume, diabetes, age, and regional malalignment are independent predictors of postoperative axial neck pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motion-sparing cervical decompressive surgery performed for compressive radiculopathy or myelopathy can also provide significant relief of axial neck pain, suggesting that preoperative axial neck pain is not an absolute contraindication to non-fusion decompressive surgery for degenerative cervical pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251319544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251319544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: We analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) focused on axial neck pain following cervical laminoplasty (CL) and foraminotomy (CF) for symptomatic cervical spondylosis to determine whether motion-preserving procedures targeting compressive radiculopathy/myelopathy also provide relief of axial neck pain and to investigate risk factors for persistent postoperative axial neck pain.

Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published from 2014 to 2023 describing pain-related outcomes following CL and CF. Data regarding PROs, reoperation rates, and risk factors for postoperative axial neck pain were also collected.

Results: Thirty studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. There were 2499 cases (2129 CL and 370 CF) with mean ages of 63.2 and 59.3 years for CL and CF, respectively. CL patients had improved mean postoperative visual analogue scale and neck disability index (NDI) scores compared to preoperative values, with mean differences of -1.97 (CI -2.52, -1.42; P < 0.0001) and -12.27 (CI -15.01, -9.54; P < 0.0001), respectively. CF patients had improved mean postoperative NDI scores compared to preoperative values, with mean difference of -15.15 (CI -23.79, -6.50; P = 0.0064). Presence of anterolisthesis, loss of cervical muscle volume, diabetes, age, and regional malalignment are independent predictors of postoperative axial neck pain.

Conclusions: Motion-sparing cervical decompressive surgery performed for compressive radiculopathy or myelopathy can also provide significant relief of axial neck pain, suggesting that preoperative axial neck pain is not an absolute contraindication to non-fusion decompressive surgery for degenerative cervical pathologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Cervical Laminoplasty and Cervical Foraminotomy on Axial Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Burden and Predictors of Incisional Hernia Following Anterior Lumbar Fusion: A National Study. Letter Re: "Is Endoscopic Surgery a Safe and Effective Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials". Full-Percutaneous Trans-Kambin Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage. Letter to the Editor: "Which is the Superior Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Tool? TLICS Versus AOSpine 2013: A Systematic Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1