Influence of Gender Role on Resilience and Positive Affect in Female Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13030336
L Iván Mayor-Silva, Guillermo Moreno, Alfonso Meneses-Monroy, Patricia Martín-Casas, Marta M Hernández-Martín, Antonio G Moreno-Pimentel, Leyre Rodríguez-Leal
{"title":"Influence of Gender Role on Resilience and Positive Affect in Female Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"L Iván Mayor-Silva, Guillermo Moreno, Alfonso Meneses-Monroy, Patricia Martín-Casas, Marta M Hernández-Martín, Antonio G Moreno-Pimentel, Leyre Rodríguez-Leal","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13030336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Women experience more social barriers, gender stereotypes, biases, and discrimination than men, which can increase their vulnerability to mental health problems. Therefore, it is essential to adopt a gender perspective in research on nursing students, examining the impact of these factors on their well-being and psychological resources like resilience. This study aims to analyze the relationship between gender roles in resilience and positive or negative affect among female nursing students. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted with first- and fourth-year female nursing students at a public university in Madrid, Spain. Sociodemographic variables, positive and negative affect (PANAS scale), resilience (CD-RISC scale), and gender roles (BRSI inventory) were analyzed. ANOVA, correlation analysis, and linear regression models were used to study the relationships between variables. <b>Results</b>: The study included 338 students with a mean age of 21.43 years, of which 80.2% had a high level of resilience, with a positive affect score of 31.96 (SD: 7.34) and a negative affect score of 22.99 (SD: 7.35). Overall, 48.5% had undifferentiated roles, 23.7% feminine roles, 14.2% androgynous roles, and 13.6% masculine roles. Female students with masculine and androgynous roles showed higher resilience levels (93.48% and 97.92%) compared to those with feminine and undifferentiated roles (81.25% and 70.73%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Female students with androgynous and masculine roles showed higher positive affect levels compared to those with feminine and undifferentiated roles (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no differences in negative affect. These results were observed in both first- and fourth-year students. A high correlation was found between masculine roles and positive affect and resilience in both first- and fourth-year students. <b>Conclusions</b>: Gender roles influence positive affect and resilience in females. Among female nursing students, androgynous and masculine roles are associated with higher levels of resilience and positive affect compared to feminine and undifferentiated roles. Differences in psychological well-being may be related to socially constructed gender roles rather than biological sex, with masculine roles enhancing resilience and feminine roles correlating with greater vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Women experience more social barriers, gender stereotypes, biases, and discrimination than men, which can increase their vulnerability to mental health problems. Therefore, it is essential to adopt a gender perspective in research on nursing students, examining the impact of these factors on their well-being and psychological resources like resilience. This study aims to analyze the relationship between gender roles in resilience and positive or negative affect among female nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with first- and fourth-year female nursing students at a public university in Madrid, Spain. Sociodemographic variables, positive and negative affect (PANAS scale), resilience (CD-RISC scale), and gender roles (BRSI inventory) were analyzed. ANOVA, correlation analysis, and linear regression models were used to study the relationships between variables. Results: The study included 338 students with a mean age of 21.43 years, of which 80.2% had a high level of resilience, with a positive affect score of 31.96 (SD: 7.34) and a negative affect score of 22.99 (SD: 7.35). Overall, 48.5% had undifferentiated roles, 23.7% feminine roles, 14.2% androgynous roles, and 13.6% masculine roles. Female students with masculine and androgynous roles showed higher resilience levels (93.48% and 97.92%) compared to those with feminine and undifferentiated roles (81.25% and 70.73%) (p < 0.001). Female students with androgynous and masculine roles showed higher positive affect levels compared to those with feminine and undifferentiated roles (p < 0.001), with no differences in negative affect. These results were observed in both first- and fourth-year students. A high correlation was found between masculine roles and positive affect and resilience in both first- and fourth-year students. Conclusions: Gender roles influence positive affect and resilience in females. Among female nursing students, androgynous and masculine roles are associated with higher levels of resilience and positive affect compared to feminine and undifferentiated roles. Differences in psychological well-being may be related to socially constructed gender roles rather than biological sex, with masculine roles enhancing resilience and feminine roles correlating with greater vulnerability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别角色对女护生心理弹性和积极情绪影响的横断面研究
导言:妇女比男子经历更多的社会障碍、性别陈规定型观念、偏见和歧视,这可能增加她们面对精神健康问题的脆弱性。因此,在对护生的研究中采用性别视角,检查这些因素对他们的幸福感和心理资源(如弹性)的影响是至关重要的。本研究旨在分析护生心理弹性的性别角色与积极或消极情绪的关系。方法:对西班牙马德里一所公立大学的一年级和四年级女护理专业学生进行横断面研究。分析了社会人口学变量、积极和消极影响(PANAS量表)、恢复力(CD-RISC量表)和性别角色(BRSI量表)。采用方差分析、相关分析和线性回归模型研究变量之间的关系。结果:共纳入338名学生,平均年龄21.43岁,其中80.2%的学生心理弹性水平较高,积极情绪得分为31.96 (SD: 7.34),消极情绪得分为22.99 (SD: 7.35)。总体而言,48.5%的人没有区分角色,23.7%为女性角色,14.2%为雌雄同体角色,13.6%为男性角色。男性角色和中性角色的女生心理弹性水平分别为93.48%和97.92%,高于女性角色和未分化角色的81.25%和70.73% (p < 0.001)。雌雄同体和男性化角色的女学生的积极情感水平高于女性化角色和未分化角色的女学生(p < 0.001),而消极情感水平无差异。这些结果在一年级和四年级的学生中都观察到了。在一年级和四年级学生中,男性角色与积极情感和弹性之间存在高度相关。结论:性别角色影响女性的积极情绪和心理弹性。在女护生中,雌雄同体和男性角色与女性和未分化角色相比,具有更高的心理弹性和积极影响水平。心理健康的差异可能与社会建构的性别角色有关,而不是与生理性别有关,男性角色增强弹性,而女性角色更容易受到伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and Pre-Post Changes Associated with a 12-Week Treadmill Walking Training Programme on Walking Performance, Physical Function, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Arm Pilot Study. Effectiveness of a Dyadic Pain Management Program for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Chronic Pain: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Mapping the Landscape of Medical AI Research in Korea Using Topic Modeling. Predictability of Deep Bite Correction and Curve of Spee Flattening in Clear Aligner Therapy: An Open-Label and One Arm Retrospective Study. Reproductive Health Challenges Among Adolescents in Eastern Europe: Evidence from a Romanian Tertiary Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1