How People in Eight European Countries Felt About the Safety, Effectiveness, and Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13030344
Kristien Coteur, Marija Zafirovska, Aleksandar Zafirovski, Jelena Danilenko, Heidrun Lingner, Felix Bauch, Christine Brütting, Nicola Buono, Vanja Lazic, Liljana Ramasaco, Vija Silina, Lara-Marie Fuehner, Michael Harris
{"title":"How People in Eight European Countries Felt About the Safety, Effectiveness, and Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Kristien Coteur, Marija Zafirovska, Aleksandar Zafirovski, Jelena Danilenko, Heidrun Lingner, Felix Bauch, Christine Brütting, Nicola Buono, Vanja Lazic, Liljana Ramasaco, Vija Silina, Lara-Marie Fuehner, Michael Harris","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13030344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/objectives:</b> Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination vary globally, influenced by political and cultural factors. This research aimed to assess the views of people without a healthcare qualification in Europe on COVID-19 vaccination safety, effectiveness, and necessity as well as how well informed they felt. The secondary outcomes focused on how respondents' views were affected by demographic and context factors and included a comparison by country of the level of feeling well informed. <b>Methods:</b> A mixed-method cross-sectional online survey in eight European countries, using convenience sampling. <b>Results</b>: A total of 1008 adults completed the survey, 60% of whom were female. While only 44.1% considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary, 80.0% had been vaccinated. Four in ten adults strongly agreed that they were well informed, while over a quarter did not answer the question. Younger respondents, well-informed individuals, and German respondents were more inclined to perceive COVID-19 vaccination as both effective and necessary. <b>Conclusions</b>: Motivations for vaccination included perceived health and social benefits, while concerns included a preference for \"natural immunity\", the rapid development of the vaccine, and potential unknown long-term effects. A correlation existed between respondents feeling well informed about the different COVID-19 vaccines in their country and the likelihood of having been vaccinated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination vary globally, influenced by political and cultural factors. This research aimed to assess the views of people without a healthcare qualification in Europe on COVID-19 vaccination safety, effectiveness, and necessity as well as how well informed they felt. The secondary outcomes focused on how respondents' views were affected by demographic and context factors and included a comparison by country of the level of feeling well informed. Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional online survey in eight European countries, using convenience sampling. Results: A total of 1008 adults completed the survey, 60% of whom were female. While only 44.1% considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary, 80.0% had been vaccinated. Four in ten adults strongly agreed that they were well informed, while over a quarter did not answer the question. Younger respondents, well-informed individuals, and German respondents were more inclined to perceive COVID-19 vaccination as both effective and necessary. Conclusions: Motivations for vaccination included perceived health and social benefits, while concerns included a preference for "natural immunity", the rapid development of the vaccine, and potential unknown long-term effects. A correlation existed between respondents feeling well informed about the different COVID-19 vaccines in their country and the likelihood of having been vaccinated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
八个欧洲国家的人们对COVID-19疫苗接种的安全性、有效性和必要性的看法:一项横断面调查。
背景/目的:受政治和文化因素影响,全球对COVID-19疫苗接种的态度各不相同。这项研究旨在评估欧洲没有医疗保健资格的人对COVID-19疫苗接种安全性、有效性和必要性的看法,以及他们的知情程度。次要结果侧重于受访者的观点如何受到人口和环境因素的影响,并包括按国家比较感觉信息灵通的水平。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,在欧洲8个国家采用混合方法进行横断面在线调查。结果:共有1008名成年人完成调查,其中60%为女性。虽然只有44.1%的人认为疫苗安全,43.5%的人认为有效,44.9%的人认为必要,但80.0%的人接种了疫苗。十分之四的成年人强烈认为自己消息灵通,而超过四分之一的人没有回答这个问题。年轻的受访者、消息灵通的个人和德国受访者更倾向于认为COVID-19疫苗接种既有效又必要。结论:接种疫苗的动机包括对健康和社会效益的认识,而担忧包括对“自然免疫”的偏好、疫苗的快速发展以及潜在的未知长期影响。受访者对本国不同的COVID-19疫苗知情程度与接种疫苗的可能性之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and Pre-Post Changes Associated with a 12-Week Treadmill Walking Training Programme on Walking Performance, Physical Function, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Arm Pilot Study. Effectiveness of a Dyadic Pain Management Program for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Chronic Pain: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Mapping the Landscape of Medical AI Research in Korea Using Topic Modeling. Predictability of Deep Bite Correction and Curve of Spee Flattening in Clear Aligner Therapy: An Open-Label and One Arm Retrospective Study. Reproductive Health Challenges Among Adolescents in Eastern Europe: Evidence from a Romanian Tertiary Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1