Effects of intracuff and intravenous lignocaine on recovery from anaesthesia after thyroid surgery. A single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (The IOLANT study).

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_487_24
Sergey M Efremov, Alexey Y Kulikov, Valeria P Govorushkina, Daniil D Sidorov, Alexey A Ladutko, Oleg V Kuleshov
{"title":"Effects of intracuff and intravenous lignocaine on recovery from anaesthesia after thyroid surgery. A single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (The IOLANT study).","authors":"Sergey M Efremov, Alexey Y Kulikov, Valeria P Govorushkina, Daniil D Sidorov, Alexey A Ladutko, Oleg V Kuleshov","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_487_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite evidence that local intracuff alkalinised lignocaine may reduce the incidence of exaggerated laryngeal reflexes after thyroid surgery, its effects on the quality of recovery (QoR) from anaesthesia remain unknown. This study aimed to test if local intracuff alkalinised lignocaine improves the QoR from anaesthesia after thyroid surgery compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients over 45 years old scheduled for thyroid surgery with electromyographic monitoring under general anaesthesia were enroled in a randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They were randomised into three groups (1:1:1 ratio): intravenous lignocaine (IVL), topical and intracuff lignocaine (TL), and placebo. The sample size was initially set at 231, but the study was terminated early after an interim analysis of 110 patients showed no significant difference between groups. The primary outcome was the QoR-40 score 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included rates of arterial hypotension, coughing during emergence, bispectral index (BIS) values, and electromyographic monitoring characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An interim analysis after 110 patients showed mean QoR-40 scores of 185 (standard deviation(SD): 11.4) (placebo), 186.1 (SD: 13.6) (IVL), and 185.1 (SD: 14.3) (TL) (<i>P</i> = 0.662). Mean differences were 1.1 (IVL vs placebo, 95%CI: -5.03, 7.15, z = 0.347) and 0.1 (TL vs placebo, 95%CI: -6.02, 6.23, z = 0.035). The study was stopped due to lack of effectiveness as the superiority of IVL and TL was not demonstrated. No differences were found in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither IVL nor TL improved the QoR from anaesthesia and did not affect electromyographic monitoring in low-risk thyroid surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 12","pages":"1055-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_487_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Despite evidence that local intracuff alkalinised lignocaine may reduce the incidence of exaggerated laryngeal reflexes after thyroid surgery, its effects on the quality of recovery (QoR) from anaesthesia remain unknown. This study aimed to test if local intracuff alkalinised lignocaine improves the QoR from anaesthesia after thyroid surgery compared to placebo.

Methods: Patients over 45 years old scheduled for thyroid surgery with electromyographic monitoring under general anaesthesia were enroled in a randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They were randomised into three groups (1:1:1 ratio): intravenous lignocaine (IVL), topical and intracuff lignocaine (TL), and placebo. The sample size was initially set at 231, but the study was terminated early after an interim analysis of 110 patients showed no significant difference between groups. The primary outcome was the QoR-40 score 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included rates of arterial hypotension, coughing during emergence, bispectral index (BIS) values, and electromyographic monitoring characteristics.

Results: An interim analysis after 110 patients showed mean QoR-40 scores of 185 (standard deviation(SD): 11.4) (placebo), 186.1 (SD: 13.6) (IVL), and 185.1 (SD: 14.3) (TL) (P = 0.662). Mean differences were 1.1 (IVL vs placebo, 95%CI: -5.03, 7.15, z = 0.347) and 0.1 (TL vs placebo, 95%CI: -6.02, 6.23, z = 0.035). The study was stopped due to lack of effectiveness as the superiority of IVL and TL was not demonstrated. No differences were found in secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Neither IVL nor TL improved the QoR from anaesthesia and did not affect electromyographic monitoring in low-risk thyroid surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through LMA Protector and i-gel in adult paralysed patients - A randomised comparative study. 5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound protocol for confirmation of endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients undergoing surgery: A prospective observational study. Anaesthesia for foetal ex-utero intrapartum therapy (EXIT) surgery. Data-based regression models for predicting remifentanil pharmacokinetics. Effects of intracuff and intravenous lignocaine on recovery from anaesthesia after thyroid surgery. A single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (The IOLANT study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1