Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00788
Fauzia Riaz, John L Vaughn, Huili Zhu, James C Dickerson, Hoda E Sayegh, Samantha Brongiel, Elena Baldwin, Melanie W Kier, Jacob Zaemes, Caleb Hearn, Osama Abdelghany, Roger B Cohen, Ravi B Parikh, Joshua E Reuss, Elizabeth Prsic, Deborah B Doroshow
{"title":"Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Fauzia Riaz, John L Vaughn, Huili Zhu, James C Dickerson, Hoda E Sayegh, Samantha Brongiel, Elena Baldwin, Melanie W Kier, Jacob Zaemes, Caleb Hearn, Osama Abdelghany, Roger B Cohen, Ravi B Parikh, Joshua E Reuss, Elizabeth Prsic, Deborah B Doroshow","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400788"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs.

Methods: IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS.

Results: Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration.

Conclusion: IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Real-World Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Implementation: Challenges and Successes of a Pan-Canadian Initiative to Improve the Future of Patient-Centered Cancer Care. Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Virtual Second-Opinion Delivery for Oncology Patients. If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1